GAO’s recommendations database contains report recommendations that still need to be addressed.
GAO’s priority recommendations are those that we believe warrant priority attention.
We sent letters to the heads of key departments and agencies, urging them to continue focusing on these issues.
Below you can search only priority recommendations, or search all recommendations.
Our recommendations help congressional and agency leaders prepare for appropriations and oversight activities, as well as help improve government operations.
Moreover, when implemented, some of our priority recommendations can save large amounts of money, help Congress make decisions on major issues, and substantially improve or transform major government programs or agencies, among other benefits.
As of December 31, 1969, there are open recommendations, of which are priority recommendations. Recommendations remain open until they are designated as Closed-implemented or Closed-not implemented.
Browse or Search Open Recommendations
Have a Question about a Recommendation?
For questions about a specific recommendation, contact the person or office listed with the recommendation.
For general information about recommendations, contact GAO's Audit Policy and Quality Assurance office at (202) 512-6100 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Recommendation: To help lessen confusion among the public and policy makers regarding federal data on sexual violence, the Director of OMB should establish a federal interagency forum on sexual violence statistics. The forum should consider the broad range of differences across the data collection efforts to assess which differences enhance or hinder the overall understanding of sexual violence in the United States.
Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget Status: Open Priority recommendation
Comments: At the time of our report, OMB neither agreed nor disagreed with this recommendation but stated that it did not believe convening a forum was the most strategic use of resources because agencies were not far enough along with their data collection efforts. We disagree with OMB's assertion because 7 of the 10 data collection efforts have been in place for more than 10 years, and several have been in place for multiple decades. As of December 2019, OMB has not provided information on any new efforts to establish a federal interagency forum on sexual violence statistics.
Recommendation: To improve transparency and better ensure that face recognition capabilities are being used in accordance with privacy protection laws and policy requirements, the Attorney General should assess the SORN development process to determine why a SORN was not published that addressed the collection and maintenance of photos accessed and used through NGI for the FBI's face recognition capabilities prior to using NGI-IPS, and implement corrective actions to ensure SORNs are published before systems become operational.
Agency: Department of Justice Status: Open Priority recommendation
Comments: DOJ agreed, in part, with our recommendation and submitted the SORN for publication to the Federal Register on April 21, 2016, and it was published on May 5, 2016. In June 2019, DOJ officials told us that they had recently applied the pilot program for expediting the PIA review process to the way that DOJ develops and reviews SORNs. DOJ subsequently documented in its July 2019 memorandum for the record the requirement that the DOJ Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties (OPCL) is to provide comments or approval within 30 days of the FBI submitting a draft SORN to DOJ OPCL for review. The memorandum also outlines a more direct and expedient process for resolving feedback and finalizing drafts. Further, the memorandum provides that after DOJ approves an FBI SORN, it will begin the formal publication process, in accordance with the law and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) policy. DOJ officials told us that the intent of the July 2019 memorandum was to make changes to the current process that would permit DOJ to more efficiently and effectively facilitate all aspects of SORN development within its purview prior to submission to OMB. DOJ and FBI officials stated that it is their goal to consistently publish SORNs before a system's implementation. In follow-up with DOJ in December 2019, DOJ stated that it may have sufficient data to demonstrate the effect of these changes in the spring of 2020. We believe that DOJ's efforts to begin establishing a more streamlined review process for SORNs is a positive step and continue to monitor this recent pilot to determine whether these efforts help ensure SORNs are published before systems become operational.
Recommendation: To better ensure that face recognition systems are sufficiently accurate, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation should conduct an operational review of NGI-IPS at least annually that includes an assessment of the accuracy of face recognition searches to determine if it is meeting federal, state, and local law enforcement needs and take actions, as necessary, to improve the system.
Agency: Department of Justice: Federal Bureau of Investigation Status: Open Priority recommendation
Comments: In July 2019, the FBI reported that it has designed a Face Recognition Test Strategy for Operational Analysis with the objective of being able to perform an annual operational review of NGI-IPS. The FBI plans to develop and test the operational review in fiscal year 2020. As a first step, in January 2020, FBI officials told us that they had developed a tool to benchmark whether the FBI face recognition system returns the expected photos in the FBI's operational environment and were in the process of testing it. To fully implement this recommendation, the FBI should conduct operational reviews at least annually to assess the accuracy of face recognition searches on NGI-IPS.