Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, in coordination with the Surgeons General of the military departments and the Director of the DHA, consistently collect complete and accurate information about the quality of available civilian health care in proximity to its MTFs (such as ratings from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and perceptions from MTF officials who regularly coordinate with civilian providers, among other means) and assess that information to inform recommendations for future MTF restructuring decisions. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open

Comments: DOD partially concurred with this recommendation. In its response, the department described its planned implementation steps, such as publishing measures it may use for assessing available civilian health care. We will continue to monitor the status of the measures and any other actions the department takes to address the recommendation.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, in coordination with the Surgeons General of the military departments and the Director of the DHA, consistently collect complete and accurate information about the extent to which current health care providers within the TRICARE networks meet access-to-care standards, and assess that information to inform recommendations on future MTF restructuring decisions. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open

Comments: DOD partially concurred with this recommendation. The department noted actions underway and planned to implement it, including a centralized appointment booking system and monitoring access to care as MTFs restructure. We will continue to monitor the status of this effort and any other actions the department takes to address the recommendation.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, in coordination with the Surgeons General of the military departments and the Director of the DHA, consistently collect complete and accurate information about the extent to which non-network civilian health care providers that could be incorporated into the TRICARE network meet access-to-care standards in terms of drive time, and assess that information to inform recommendations on future MTF restructuring decisions. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open

Comments: DOD partially concurred with this recommendation, and described planned steps to implement it for future MTF restructuring decisions. We will continue to monitor actions the department takes to address the recommendation.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, in coordination with the Surgeons General of the military departments and the Director of the DHA, conducts a sensitivity analysis of the relative cost-effectiveness of MTF-provided care compared to civilian-provided care under varying assumptions, and document that information for decision makers to inform recommendations on future MTF restructuring decisions. Varying conditions could include different types of health care services, reducing the cost of military personnel salaries, and increasing estimated MTF wRVUs and civilian reimbursement rates. (Recommendation 4)

Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open

Comments: DOD partially concurred with this recommendation. We will continue to monitor actions the department takes to address the recommendation.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, in coordination with the Surgeons General of the military departments and the Director of the DHA, establishes clear roles and responsibilities for executing and monitoring transitions for MTFs identified for restructuring. (Recommendation 5)

Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open

Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation and described actions underway and planned to implement it. We will continue to monitor actions the department takes to address the recommendation.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, in coordination with the Surgeons General of the military departments and the Director of the DHA, defines measurable objectives for MTF restructuring transitions, establishes thresholds and goals for each objective, and applies them to evaluate progress and challenges. For example, measurable objectives, thresholds, and goals, should include an evaluation of medical providers' clinical readiness, civilian health care provider adequacy, and the cost-effectiveness of MTF and purchased care. (Recommendation 6)

Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open

Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation and described actions underway and planned to implement it. We will continue to monitor actions the department takes to address the recommendation.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should ensure that the Medicare & You publication includes explicit information on the services covered by the Medicare program for beneficiaries with a SUD. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Director of USCIS should update published guidance, such as Handbook for Employers: Guidance for Completing Form I-9 (M-274), to consistently identify each of the official mechanisms that USCIS may use to communicate automatic extensions of TPS employment authorization documents.

Agency: Department of Homeland Security: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Status: Open

Comments: In its written comments on our draft report, DHS agreed with our recommendation and noted planned actions to implement it, including updating guidance in DHS's M-274 handbook. DHS's planned actions will address the intent of our recommendation if they include updating guidance regarding each of the official mechanisms that USCIS may use to communicate automatic extensions of TPS employment authorization documents, including the use of individually mailed notifications. When we confirm actions that the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA should conduct and document a risk assessment that considers inherent and residual fraud and abuse risks that may enable criminal, national security, or safety risks. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA should determine impact, likelihood, and risk tolerance as part of a risk assessment. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA should develop a strategy that outlines specific actions to address analyzed risks, including periodic assessments to evaluate continuing effectiveness of the risk response. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA should collect and record information on individual registrants, initially including name, address, date of birth, and driver's license or pilot's license, or both, with subsequent PII elements informed by the risk assessment, once completed. (Recommendation 4)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA should collect and record information on legal entities not traded publicly—on each individual and entity that owns more than 25 percent of the aircraft; for individuals: name, date of birth, physical address, and driver's license or pilot's license, or both; and for entities: name, physical address, state of residence, and taxpayer identification number. (Recommendation 5)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA should verify aircraft registration applicants' and dealers' eligibility and information. (Recommendation 6)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA should increase aircraft registration and dealer fees to ensure the fees are sufficient to cover the costs of FAA efforts to collect and verify applicant information while keeping pace with inflation. (Recommendation 7)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA should ensure, as part of aircraft registry IT modernization, that information currently collected in ancillary files or in PDF format on (1) owners and related individuals and entities with potentially significant responsibilities for aircraft ownership (e.g., beneficial owners, trustors, trustees, beneficiaries, stockholders, directors, and managers) and (2) declarations of international operations is recorded in an electronic format that facilitates data analytics by FAA and its stakeholders. (Recommendation 8)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA should link information on owners and related individuals and entities with significant responsibilities for aircraft ownership through a common identifier. (Recommendation 9)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA should, as part of IT modernization, develop an approach to check OFAC sanctions data on owners and related individuals and entities with potentially significant responsibilities for aircraft ownership for coordination with OFAC and to flag sanctioned individuals and entities across aircraft registration and dealer systems. (Recommendation 10)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA should use data collected as part of IT modernization as well as current data sources to identify and analyze patterns of activity indicative of fraud or abuse, based on information from declarations of international operations, postal addresses, sanctions listings, and other sources, and information on dealers, noncitizen corporations, and individuals and entities with significant responsibilities for aircraft ownership. (Recommendation 11)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA should develop and implement risk-based mitigation actions to address potential fraud and abuse identified through data analyses. (Recommendation 12)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA should develop mechanisms, including regulations if necessary, for dealer suspension and revocation. (Recommendation 13)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA, in coordination with relevant law-enforcement agencies, should enhance coordination within the Aircraft Registry Task Force through collaborative mechanisms such as written agreements and use of liaison positions. (Recommendation 14)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of FAA, in coordination with relevant law-enforcement agencies, should develop a mechanism to provide declarations of international operations for law-enforcement purposes. (Recommendation 15)

Agency: Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration: Office of the Administrator
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should take steps to obtain quality information on the experiences of dual-eligible beneficiaries who have been default enrolled into D-SNPs, such as by obtaining information about the extent to which and reasons that beneficiaries disenroll from a D-SNP after being default enrolled. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Director of the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs should develop and implement procedures for coal mine operator self-insurance renewal that clarifies how long an operator is authorized to self-insure; when an operator must submit its renewal application and supporting documentation; and the conditions under which an operator's self-insurance authority would not be renewed. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Labor: Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Status: Open

Comments: DOL agreed with this recommendation and said it is acting to implement it to achieve further improvements in ensuring the effective oversight of coal mine operator insurance. DOL reported that it would ensure letters granting or renewing self-insurance authority will inform operators that their authorization expires in one year and that they must submit renewal information three months in advance of the expiration date.

Recommendation: The Director of the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs should develop and implement procedures for self-insured coal mine operator appeals that identify time lines for self-insured operators to submit documentation supporting their appeals and that identify a goal for how much time DOL should take to make appeals decisions. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Labor: Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Status: Open

Comments: DOL agreed with this recommendation and said it is acting to implement it to achieve further improvements in ensuring the effective oversight of coal mine operator insurance. DOL reported that it will ensure letters denying self-insurance will inform operators that they have a 30-day appeal period (limited to one extension) and that DOL has set a goal of resolving all appeals within 90 days of the denial letter.

Recommendation: The Director of the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs should develop and implement a process to monitor operator compliance with commercial insurance requirements and periodically evaluate the effectiveness of this process. This process should be designed to detect errors and omissions in reporting insurance coverage using complete, accurate, and consistently recorded data. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of Labor: Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Status: Open

Comments: DOL agreed with this recommendation and said it is acting to implement it to achieve further improvements in ensuring the effective oversight of coal mine operator insurance. DOL reported that it will modify existing computer systems to identify lapses or cancellations of commercial insurance coverage, and require operators identified as having lapsed or cancelled coverage to obtain or provide proof of coverage within 30 days.

Recommendation: The Director of DHA should develop and implement plans with timeframes and specific actions needed for all 13 required elements to be reflected in the TRICARE contracts. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness: Defense Health Agency
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should assess options for updating Publications 590-A and 590-B to either include more information or direct taxpayers to other resources for IRA owners with investments in unconventional assets. Such information could include: storage requirements for IRA investments in certain precious metals; valuation methods for hard-to-value IRA assets; the Department of Labor's process for granting exemptions to IRA prohibited transactions rules; and IRA investments with the potential to create unrelated business income tax liabilities. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, building on forthcoming compliance research using new IRA asset data, should evaluate the feasibility of requiring disclosure for high-risk IRA asset types associated with abusive schemes as transactions of interest. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should develop resources (such as training materials or job aids) for Small Business/Self-Employed examiners conducting IRA owner audits that explain how IRAs with unconventional assets can generate unrelated business income tax liability, and how examiners can refer cases to unrelated business income experts in IRS for assistance. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should determine the extent to which state Medicaid programs are in compliance with federal requirements to cover MAT medications in all formats and take actions to ensure compliance, as appropriate. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should ensure that state Medicaid programs have written policies and procedures that specify the extent to which covered entities can use 340B drugs for Medicaid beneficiaries, are designed to effectively identify if 340B drugs were used, and if so, how they should be excluded from Medicaid rebate requests. The policies and procedures should be made publically available and cover FFS, managed care, and all of the dispensing methods for outpatient drugs. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS concurred with this recommendation and in August 2020 stated that it is developing guidance to state Medicaid programs directing them to strengthen policies and procedures related to 340B drugs for Medicaid beneficiaries.

Recommendation: The Administrator of HRSA should incorporate assessments of covered entities' compliance with state Medicaid programs' policies and procedures regarding the use and identification of 340B drugs into its audit process, working with CMS as needed to obtain states' policies and procedures. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Public Health Service: Health Resources and Services Administration
Status: Open

Comments: HHS did not concur with this recommendation and, as of August 2020, did not plan to take any actions to implement the recommendation. As noted in our report, covered entities' compliance with state Medicaid programs' policies and procedures is fundamental to preventing duplicate discounts. Thus, we continue to believe that HRSA's audit process should include an assessment of covered entities' compliance with state Medicaid programs' policies and procedures related to 340B drugs as it is necessary to identify potential duplicate discounts and to ensure covered entities' compliance with 340B Program requirements.

Recommendation: The Administrator of HRSA should require covered entities to work with affected drug manufacturers regarding repayment of identified duplicate discounts in Medicaid managed care. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Public Health Service: Health Resources and Services Administration
Status: Open

Comments: HHS did not concur with this recommendation and, as of August 2020, did not plan to take any actions to implement the recommendation. As noted in our report, HRSA officials told us that covered entities' obligations for preventing duplicate discounts are the same for Medicaid fee-for-service and managed care. Thus, we continue to believe that when duplicate discounts related to Medicaid managed care have been identified, the agency should require covered entities to work with manufacturers to remedy them as they do for duplicate discounts related to Medicaid fee-for-service to help ensure compliance with 340B Program requirements.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should clarify policies and procedures to remind staff that a diagnosis of a substance use disorder is not necessary to conduct a Drug Addiction and Alcoholism evaluation. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: SSA agreed with this recommendation. The agency stated that it had revised related policies in February 2020, and had planned to issue guidance and video-on-demand training to further clarify policies and procedures in this area. However, SSA said its efforts to maintain mission critical activities amid the COVID-19 pandemic have delayed further implementation of this recommendation and a specific implementation date could not be provided at this time.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should ensure that staff document their rationale for decisions involving the Drug Addiction and Alcoholism evaluation process. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: SSA agreed with this recommendation. The agency said it had planned to issue guidance reinforcing its policy on properly documenting decisions involving the Drug Addiction and Alcoholism evaluation process. However, SSA said its efforts to maintain mission critical activities amid the COVID-19 pandemic have delayed implementation of this recommendation and a specific implementation date could not be provided at this time.

Recommendation: The Assistant Secretary of Labor for the Employee Benefits Security Administration should evaluate whether targeted oversight in response to information received is effective for ensuring compliance with MH/SU parity requirements. If this evaluation determines the current targeted oversight approach results in significant program risks, the Employee Benefits Security Administration should develop a plan to more effectively enforce MH/SU parity requirements and if necessary seek additional oversight authority, as warranted. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Labor: Employee Benefits Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: DOL agreed with this recommendation. In February 2020, DOL reported that its Employee Benefits Security Administration plans to evaluate its targeted approach to MH/SU parity enforcement. When we confirm what actions DOL has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should evaluate whether targeted oversight in response to information received is effective for ensuring compliance with MH/SU parity requirements for non-federal governmental plans. If this evaluation determines the current targeted oversight approach results in significant program risks, CMS should develop a plan to more effectively enforce MH/SU parity requirements and if necessary seek additional oversight authority, as warranted. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS agreed with this recommendation. In August 2020, HHS reported that CMS has developed a two-part evaluation to determine whether targeted oversight of non-federal governmental plans is effective for enforcing MH/SU parity requirements. According to HHS, this evaluation will include (1) a review of non-federal governmental plan documents for compliance with MH/SU parity requirements and (2) a survey of state enforcement authority and regulatory best practices for ensuring MH/SU parity compliance. As of August 2020, HHS reported that the first part of the CMS evaluation is underway.

Recommendation: The Director of DHA should define data sharing requirements with more specificity in its transition guidance for outgoing and incoming contractors, including the time period covered and the types of data that must be shared. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness: Defense Health Agency
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Director of DHA should revise the process the agency has in place for resolving issues raised between contractors during transition to ensure such issues are resolved within time frames that will not adversely affect the transition schedule. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness: Defense Health Agency
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Director of DHA should incorporate lessons learned from this transition and ensure that subject matter experts review PRV/PRAV requirements and performance guarantees prior to the issuance of the request for proposal for the next transition. These requirements should be reviewed to ensure their feasibility and effectiveness for assessing contractor readiness. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness: Defense Health Agency
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: Congress should consider giving CMS authority to establish additional enforcement remedies for hospices that do not meet federal health and safety requirements. (Matter for Consideration 1)

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: In October 2019, we suggested that Congress should consider giving CMS authority to establish additional enforcement remedies for hospices that do not meet federal health and safety requirements. As of June 2020, Congress has not implemented this suggestion.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should incorporate the use of additional information, such as quality measures or other information that could identify potential quality of care issues, into its survey process for overseeing hospice providers. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS concurred with this recommendation. In May 2020, HHS said CMS is evaluating ways in which the Hospice Consumer Assessment of Health Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey data can be used to inform surveys of hospice providers. HHS also said CMS intends to incorporate use of the current Hospice Quality Reporting Program (HQRP) measurement data into the survey process to provide additional items that inform a surveyor's evaluation of a hospice provider. HHS noted that these changes would be incorporated into a more comprehensive update to the survey process to target providers and areas where risk of noncompliance is greatest. HHS projected the updated process would be implemented by the end of the first quarter of calendar year 2021. In order for us to close the recommendation, CMS has to implement an updated survey process that incorporates the use of additional information that could identify potential quality of care issues, such as that described above.

Recommendation: The Under Secretary for Benefits should systematically solicit and collect information on potential financial exploitation from VA's Pension Management Centers and other relevant VA components, including VA's Office of General Counsel, and assess this information to inform plans to address the potential exploitation of veterans receiving pension benefits. Such plans could also address the broader population of veterans with disabilities. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
Status: Open

Comments: As of July 2020, VA reported taking steps to share data on potential financial exploitation threats, but further opportunities to collect information exist. In February 2020, VA updated its policy manual, instructing Pension Management Centers to send copies of any OIG fraud referrals to VA's Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Incident Team. This team plans to use the information to identify trends in potential fraud, and recommend changes to VA laws, policies, or procedures, as needed. VA also plans to use this data to coordinate with other Government agencies and offices to help prevent financial exploitation. However, VA has not reported taking steps to collect information from its Office of General Counsel, Pension Management Centers, and other components on threats to veterans that do not result in fraud referrals to OIG. VA asserts that collecting additional information on suspicious activities that do not meet the level of fraud that can be referred to OIG would be inappropriate because VA lacks investigative authority. As GAO noted in its report, not all suspicious activity or complaints rise to the level of fraud. Collecting additional information could improve VA's ability to understand threats to veterans and develop responses, such as outreach, and could build on VA efforts already underway with its Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Incident Team.

Recommendation: The Under Secretary for Benefits should place additional warnings on paper and electronic documents, including on benefit applications, regarding fees which veterans cannot be charged. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
Status: Open

Comments: As of July 2020, VA reports that it plans to include warnings on its pension applications to clarify which fees attorneys and others may charge veterans for representing them when applying for pension benefits. According to VA, information collection requests were published in the Federal Register in June 2020, and VA expects its application forms to be revised by the end of calendar year 2020. GAO will close this recommendation once VA's applications are revised.

Recommendation: The Under Secretary for Benefits should explore the costs and benefits of additional steps claims processors could take to verify that the direct deposit information provided by claimants on their applications is for the appropriate party. (Recommendation 4)

Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
Status: Open

Comments: In August 2020 VA reported that it is in the process of updating its application forms to require claimants to submit documentation, such as a voided check or deposit slip, when applying for pension benefits. GAO will close this recommendation once changes to these applications are complete.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should require states to submit and make public projections of administrative costs when seeking approval of demonstrations, including those with work requirements and all other demonstrations. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS did not concur with this recommendation in its September 2019 comments on the report. We maintain that the recommendation is valid because requiring states to make public information about administrative costs would help to ensure that demonstration proposals provide sufficient information to ensure meaningful public input.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should account for the administrative costs of demonstrations, including those with work requirements and all other demonstrations, when assessing whether demonstrations are budget neutral. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS did not concur with this recommendation in its September 2019 comments on the report. We maintain that the recommendation is valid because including administrative costs in its assessments will help HHS ensure that demonstrations are budget neutral.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should assess the risks of providing federal funds for costs to administer work requirements that are not allowable and should respond to risks by improving oversight procedures, as warranted. This assessment should consider risks related to costs for information systems, beneficiary supports, and managed care. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS did not concur with this recommendation in its September 2019 comments on the report. We maintain that the recommendation is valid and that assessing these risks of providing federal funds for costs that are not allowable and improving oversight, as warranted, would help HHS to ensure the integrity of the Medicaid program.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should ensure that (a) the agency's policies and guidance are specific enough so field office staff know how to apply complex suitability criteria for assessing payee suitability, such as by providing a minimum set of specific questions; and (b) additional regional guidance that is made available to staff is centrally reviewed for compliance and completeness. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: SSA agreed with this recommendation but did not specify plans to address it.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should create safeguards in the Electronic Representative Payee System (eRPS) to ensure that field office staff fully document all required information, such as the rationale for their decision, before approving an application. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: SSA agreed with this recommendation and identified actions to address it. Specifically, SSA reported that, as part of implementing the Strengthening Protections for Social Security Beneficiaries Act of 2018, planned changes to eRPS will improve documentation of selection decisions. SSA also reported it will also consider additional enhancements to eRPS in the future. We will consider closing this recommendation when this effort is complete.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should complete a plan, including timeframes, for comprehensively evaluating if and how to leverage external sources of information on organizations' suitability, such as by conducting background checks or credit checks on organizations or key staff that handle beneficiaries' funds or requiring organizations to conduct their own background checks on key staff. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: SSA agreed with this recommendation and identified actions to address it. SSA officials stated that it is first focusing on implementing provisions of the Strengthening Protections for Social Security Beneficiaries Act of 2018 related to background checks for certain individual payees. After completing this work, the agency plans to evaluate conducting criminal background checks and credit checks on organizational payees and their staff. While we agree that implementing background screening pursuant to the law should take precedence, SSA should seek opportunities to implement screening for organizational payees at the earliest opportunity.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should develop and implement mechanisms to systematically obtain and review feedback from organizational payees and communicate findings to SSA management. (Recommendation 4)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: SSA agreed with this recommendation but did not identify plans to address it.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should (a) establish a plan and time frame for periodically reviewing the predictive model's design; (b) consider additional data sources that would allow for additional screening or modeling of potentially high-risk organizational payees; and (c) ensure that subsequent design decisions are documented in sufficient detail so the development process can be more fully understood and replicated, either by SSA or a knowledgeable third party, with minimal further explanation. (Recommendation 5)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: SSA agreed with this recommendation in 2019 and identified actions to address it. The agency stated that it would pursue other data sources to develop additional screening tools and models to identify potentially high-risk organizational payees, but that it is unable to incorporate additional data into the existing model. They reported they cannot use new data to modify the existing model, which was built from cases and transactions that occurred many years ago. We recognize that the current model, which focuses on misuse findings and is based on historical data, presents challenges for both updating and including new data sources. Therefore, as SSA considers additional screening tools and models to identify high-risk, low-volume organizational payees, SSA should develop a plan for revising the existing model that allows for more timely updates and results in documentation of related design decisions. In April 2020, SSA officials reported that the agency is finalizing a plan to revise the existing model and would pursue other data sources to develop additional screening tools and models to identify potentially high-risk organizational payees.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should require field offices to contact payees about missing or problematic annual accounting forms within a specific time frame. (Recommendation 6)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: SSA agreed with this recommendation but did not identify plans to address it.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should revise the annual accounting form to enhance its effectiveness. Such revisions could include (but not be limited to) more fully ascertaining the use of collective accounts, adopting stakeholders' recommendations on using the form to collect more meaningful data, and reflecting best practices from behavioral science insights in the design of the form. (Recommendation 7)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: SSA agreed with this recommendation but did not identify plans to address it.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should enhance the eRPS system to ensure that field offices are (a) alerted when collective accounts are due to be reviewed; and (b) able to take action on expired collective account information and thereby avoid payees' continued use of these accounts without oversight. (Recommendation 8)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: SSA agreed with this recommendation and identified actions to address it. SSA officials reported that they would work with staff to ensure staff know where to find alerts for expiring accounts and enhance how eRPS displays information on collective accounts that have already expired. We agree with SSA's proposed actions. However, we adjusted our recommendation to clarify that SSA should enhance eRPS in a manner that ensures staff take action on expired accounts and that payees do not continue to use expired accounts without oversight.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should, as it carries through with its plan to develop a risk assessment for the organizational payee program, ensure that that the plan reflects periodic consideration of findings from onsite reviews and audits. (Recommendation 9)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: SSA agreed with this recommendation. In April 2020, SSA officials reported starting its Representative Payee Fraud Risk Assessment. We will consider closing this recommendation when SSA ensures that its risk assessment plan reflects periodic consideration of findings from onsite reviews and audits.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should work with states and relevant federal agencies to collect accurate and complete data on blood lead screening for Medicaid beneficiaries in order to ensure that CMS is able to monitor state compliance with its blood lead screening policy, and assist states with planning improvements to address states' compliance as needed. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: In June 2020, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) officials said that obtaining complete data on blood lead screenings for children enrolled in Medicaid will not be possible, but that the agency is committed to improving the accuracy and completeness of the data. For example, in February 2020, CMS reported that the agency is planning to use a new data system-as states meet certain data quality and completeness benchmarks for the system-to generate the report that includes states' blood lead screening data. CMS stated that this will improve the agency's and states' ability to assess gaps in blood lead screening data. This is a positive step, yet any new data system will also need to consider how to help address known limitations in the current blood lead screening data, such as the under-counting of blood lead screening tests not paid for by Medicaid. To implement this recommendation, CMS should address limitations in blood lead screening data to better monitor compliance with the agency's blood lead screening policy.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should regularly assess the appropriateness of performance measures and targets for the EPSDT benefit, and take any necessary actions to ensure their relevance and use, including adding, changing, or removing measures, or targets, and regularly communicating performance measures and targets to states. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In June 2020, CMS officials reiterated that they do not concur with this recommendation, in part because the agency does not have the authority to set binding targets for every EPSDT measure. As we stated in our report, our recommendation does not assume that targets should be set for every measure--rather, that CMS needs to regularly assess the appropriateness of performance measures and targets for the EPSDT benefit and communicate them to states. This includes assessments of the CMS-416 performance measures, such as the participant and screening ratios. which CMS officials acknowledge have limitations.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should conduct regular evaluations of state performance by comparing states' performance measurement data with CMS's EPSDT targets to identify gaps in states' performance and areas for improvement. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In June 2020, CMS officials reiterated that they do not concur with this recommendation, in part because the agency provides states with information about their performance on ESPDT measures reported on the Child Core Set, including a state's performance relative to other states' performance. We noted the limitations of this approach in our report; descriptions of a state's performance relative to other states is subject to change over time. For example, because the median is the midpoint of all states' performance, it ensures that half of states will not meet it, regardless of their individual performance. A fixed target--or targeted improvement goal, such as the one developed as part of the Oral Health Initiative--would provide states with the opportunity to measure performance over prior years' results, which is a more meaningful measure that all states can strive to achieve.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should assist states with planning needed improvements, including providing focused assistance, to resolve gaps in states' performance in meeting CMS's EPSDT targets. (Recommendation 4)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In June 2020, CMS officials reiterated that they do not concur with this recommendation, in part because the agency does not believe that it is productive or appropriate to set targets for every EPSDT measure. As we stated in our report, our recommendation does not assume that targets should be set for every measure. However, developing additional targets on performance measures critical to beneficiaries' health and well-being could help improve oversight of EPSDT. Targeted technical assistance could be valuable for CMS to provide to states after identifying gaps in states' performance relative to EPSDT targets. Doing so would allow CMS to share additional strategies to help states plan and implement needed improvements.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should develop a plan with time frames and interim milestones for using T-MSIS data to generate the necessary data from the Child Core Set to improve EPSDT oversight and streamline state reporting. (Recommendation 6)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In June 2020, CMS officials said that they are currently exploring the feasibility of using T-MSIS data to generate certain Child Core Set measures. Specifically, the agency is conducting a pilot with five Child Core Set measures. CMS officials said that they will use the pilot's results to determine the timeline for generating the additional Child Core Set measures through T-MSIS. GAO will continue to follow the agency's progress on this activity.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should ensure the agency's Medicaid third-party liability guidance is consistent with federal law related to

• the requirement for states to apply cost avoidance procedures to claims for labor, delivery, and postpartum care services,
• the requirement for states to make payments without regard to potential third-party liability for pediatric preventive services unless the state has made a determination related to cost-effectiveness and access to care that warrants cost avoidance for 90 days, and
• state flexibility to make payments without regard to potential third-party liability for pediatric services provided to child support enforcement beneficiaries. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: On November 14, 2019, CMS issued an Informational Bulletin providing further guidance to Medicaid Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) of 2018 and changes to Medicaid Provisions Passed in April 2019-Third Party Liability in Medicaid and CHIP. The intent of the information Bulletin is to further clarify CMS guidance issued in the agency's June 2018 Bulletin on key provisions related to third party liability in Medicaid and CHIP. The Bulletin also addresses April 2019 changes to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013. The bulletin clarifies CMS guidance on two of the three issues we identified in our 2019 report. The bulletin notes that (1) effective February 9, 2018 a state is required to use standard coordination of benefits cost avoidance when processing claims for prenatal services which now includes labor and delivery and postpartum care claims, and (2) effective October 1, 2019, a state is required to make payments without regard to third party liability for pediatric preventive services unless the state has made a determination related to cost-effectiveness and access to care that warrants cost avoidance for 90 days. However, with regard to the third issue, the bulletin notes that, effective April 18, 2019, a state is allowed 100 days to pay claims related to child support enforcement, but does not note that states may choose to make payment within 30 days, if the state determines doing so is cost-effective and necessary to ensure access to care. We will continue to monitor CMS guidance on payments related to child support enforcement to assess whether the recommendation is fully implemented.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should determine the extent to which state Medicaid programs are meeting federal third-party liability requirements and take actions to ensure compliance as appropriate. Such actions can include ensuring that state plans reflect the law. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: As of February 2020, we are unaware of any actions taken by CMS to implement this recommendation.

Recommendation: The Secretary of the Treasury, as Chairperson of the Boards of Trustees, should work with the other trustees to take steps—in consultation with the chief actuaries of SSA and CMS—to improve the management of the report development schedule in order to provide the Trustees reports to Congress by the statutory deadline. These steps could include regularly updating the schedule using actual progress and archiving the final iteration of the schedules. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of the Treasury
Status: Open

Comments: Treasury agreed with the recommendation and said they would work with the other trustees to take steps to improve the management of the report development schedule.

Recommendation: The Secretary of the Treasury, as Chairperson of the Boards of Trustees, should work with the other trustees to establish a policy to inform Congressional committees of jurisdiction when the trustees determine that the reports are expected to miss the issuance deadline. This outreach should include 1) the factors that are contributing to delays, and 2) the reports' expected issuance dates. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of the Treasury
Status: Open

Comments: Treasury agreed with this recommendation. The agency said it would explore the potential for a policy to inform Congressional committees of jurisdiction when the trustees determine that the reports are expected to miss the April 1 deadline.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct DHA to ensure that MTFs' referral management center staff are trained to process and accurately document information in MHS Genesis about specialty care referrals, including the receipt of CLRs, the submission of referral results, and the closure of referrals. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct DHA to ensure that MHS Genesis is configured to produce reports that accurately reflect the use and outcomes of specialty care referrals. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should develop and communicate a policy that defines when changes to a pending section 1115 demonstration application are considered major and should prompt a new review of the application against the transparency requirements applicable to the pending application. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In response to this recommendation, HHS stated that existing regulations permit CMS at its discretion to direct an additional public comment period when states make a modification to an application that substantially changes the design. In July 2020, CMS officials said the agency would continue to exercise its regulatory discretion as needed and planned no further action in response to this recommendation. In light of past CMS decisions to not require states to first seek public comment before submitting major changes to their demonstration applications, we maintain that a policy is needed defining when changes are considered major and should prompt a new review of the application against transparency requirements. We will continue to monitor CMS's actions in this area.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should develop and communicate a policy whereby applications for section 1115 demonstration amendments that may have significant impact are subject to transparency requirements comparable to those for new demonstrations and extensions. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: HHS stated that it plans to implement a policy applying state public input processes and application criteria to amendments proposing significant or substantial changes in the same manner as for new demonstrations. In July 2020, CMS stated the agency plans to develop criteria for determining whether an amendment application proposes a substantial change to an existing demonstration and to include this in guidance by early 2021. We will continue to monitor CMS's actions in this area and will close this recommendation once this policy guidance is issued.

Recommendation: CMS should take action to ensure South Dakota's Medicaid state plan provides coverage for abortions in cases of rape and in cases of incest, in addition to life endangerment, to comply with federal law, which currently requires such coverage. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In June 2019, HHS officials reported they were reviewing agency processes and would determine the best course of action moving forward. Officials said they would provide an update on actions by 12/20/2019. As of April 6, 2020, this recommendation remains open.

Recommendation: CMS should determine the extent to which state Medicaid programs are in compliance with federal requirements regarding coverage of Mifeprex and take actions to ensure compliance, as appropriate. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In June 2019, HHS officials reported they were reviewing agency processes and would determine the best course of action moving forward. Officials said they would provide an update on actions by 12/20/2019. As of April 6, 2020, this recommendation remains open.

Recommendation: CMS should determine the extent to which state Medicaid programs are accurately reporting fee-for-service abortions on line 14 of the CMS-64 and take actions to ensure accuracy, as appropriate. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In June 2019, HHS officials reported they were developing written instructions for states to reiterate fee-for-service reporting requirements for abortions provided in their Medicaid programs. Officials said they would provide an update on actions by 12/20/2019. As of April 6, 2020, this recommendation remains open.

Recommendation: As MHS governing bodies conduct their recurring reviews of quality measures selected for MHS's Core Dashboard and Purchased Care Dashboards, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs should direct those bodies to prioritize, as appropriate, the selection of measures that apply to both direct and purchased care at the provider level and that expand the range of quality measure types and medical conditions that are assessed. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs)
Status: Open

Comments: As of January 2020, DOD officials described proposed actions to address key elements of our recommendation. Specifically, DOD officials described compiling a comprehensive library of existing inpatient and outpatient quality measures for both direct and purchased care; categorizing those measures by type and medical condition; and identifying 8 measures that are common across direct and purchased care. DOD stated it is considering expanding those 8 common measures to 12 measures. The new measures would cover three cancer screening measures and an additional inpatient satisfaction measure. However, DOD officials noted these 12 measures are not reported at the provider level for purchased care given current contract reporting requirements and would require contract modifications. DOD officials also said they are participating in an interagency partnership to use a common set of quality measures across federal programs, including under the Department of Veterans Affairs. Once those quality measures are determined, DOD may expand the range of quality measures common across direct and purchased care to be consistent with other federal programs. We will keep this recommendation open until DOD provides additional information on actions taken to select and expand quality measures across direct and purchased care.

Recommendation: The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs should establish, as appropriate, performance standards related to the Purchased Care Dashboard measures that are consistent with the MHS's performance standards for direct care; ensure they are applied to individual purchased care providers; and take steps, such as amending its managed care support contracts, if necessary, to require corrective actions to be taken when providers do not meet those standards. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Defense: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs)
Status: Open

Comments: As of January 2020, DOD officials said that once a common set of quality measures is adopted to the extent possible across direct and purchased care (as discussed in Recommendation 1), DOD plans to establish consistent performance standards applied to individual providers and plans to develop processes to issue corrective actions for individual direct and purchased care providers who do not consistently meet established standards. We will update this recommendation as DOD provides progress updates on the implementation of these plans.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should eliminate impediments to collaborative audits in managed care conducted by audit contractors and states, by ensuring that managed care audits are conducted regardless of which entity--the state or the managed care organization--recoups any identified overpayments. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: CMS agreed with and has taken some steps to address this action, as recommended by GAO in July 2018. In September 2019, CMS reported that in July 2019 CMS held a meeting with states and collaborative audit contractors to discuss coordination of managed care audits, including a wide range of challenges with managed care audits. As result of the feedback and recommendations received, CMS is evaluating several process improvements and reiterated that audit contractors will continue to work with states to provide support and assistance in Medicaid managed care, and that Medicaid managed care audits should not be limited by MCO contract language. Although CMS has communicated to states the need to increase audits in managed care and address identified issues, it is unclear if these actions will remove known impediments to managed care audits or result in an increase in the number of collaborative audits. Implementing GAO's July 2018 recommendation is needed because few audits of Medicaid managed care have been conducted and overpayments can be significant based on the findings from federal and state audits and investigations that have been completed. .

Recommendation: The Director of OMB should develop guidance on how agencies test to identify improper payments, such as using a risk-based approach to help ensure that key risks of improper payments, such as eligibility, are addressed through testing processes. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: OMB partially concurred with this recommendation. On July 31, 2019, we met with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). At the meeting, OMB officials indicated that OMB's position has not changed since the issuance of the GAO report and what OMB had already communicated to GAO at the exit conference. Specifically, OMB stated that it should not have to develop more specific guidance as each program and activity has its own risks. Instead, inspectors general are better equipped and positioned to review the sampling and estimation plans as part of their annual Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010 compliance audits and that agencies, their statisticians, and inspectors general should work out the best testing procedures for their agencies. We continue to believe that OMB could provide suggestions during OMB's annual town meeting related to improper payments for areas that inspectors general may consider. Further, although we agree that programs and activities may face different risks of improper payment, we continue to believe that guidance from OMB on how agencies test to identify improper payments, such as using a risk-based approach, could help ensure that agencies address the specific risks they identify when developing improper payment estimates. In February 2020, OMB informed us that it had no status updates to provide at this time. We will continue to monitor agency's actions to address this recommendation.

Recommendation: The Director of OMB should develop guidance clarifying the appropriate treatment of nonresponse cases during improper payment testing. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: OMB concurred with this recommendation. On July 31, 2019, we met with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). At the meeting, OMB officials indicated that OMB's position has not changed since the issuance of the GAO report and what OMB had already communicated to GAO at the exit conference. At the meeting, OMB officials stated that OMB will "consider" updating guidance in OMB Circular A-123, Appendix C, to direct agencies to treat nonresponse cases such as improper payments and to include a new category for tracking such cases but only after assessing the impact such guidance would have on the agencies testing and reporting of improper payments. OMB has not taken action to develop this guidance. In February 2020, OMB informed us that it had no status updates to provide at this time. We will continue to monitor agency's actions to address this recommendation.

Recommendation: The Director of OPM should assess the processes to estimate Retirement improper payments to determine whether they effectively address key risks of improper payments--including eligibility and whether older claims face different risks of improper payments than new claims--and take steps to update the processes to incorporate key risks that are not currently addressed. (Recommendation 4)

Agency: Office of Personnel Management
Status: Open

Comments: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) partially concurred with this recommendation. Prior to 2006, the improper payment estimate sampling methodology used by OPM included both new and old adjudicated claims. After analyzing several years of data using this methodology, OPM found that including older claims in the sample could result in claimant's records being sampled multiple times. In addition, OPM also found that the variance in the number of errors detected in new claims versus old claims was very low. OPM also looked at the resources used in performing the audit of old and new claims and based on these factors, management determined that it was not an efficient use of resources to include both old and new claims in the review. The methodology was updated to make the process more efficient. By using new claims only, OPM was able to provide feedback to program managers more timely. As a result, management can address issues negatively impacting the improper payment rate and prevent improper payments promptly. OPM agrees with the intent of our recommendation; however, OPM does not agree with our recommendation regarding a risk assessment on eligibility. Eligibility is determined before annuity/survivor benefits are fully adjudicated. As part of its correction plan, OPM stated that it will conduct an audit of older claims to determine if there are different risks to new claims. In February 2020, OPM indicated that it is currently in the process of pulling/gathering the cases that should be in the universe of this audit. OPM plans to complete the corrective action by end of 4th quarter of fiscal year 2020. We will continue to monitor the agency's actions to address this recommendation.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should subject accessories essential to the group 3 power wheelchairs in the permanent DMEPOS program to prior authorization. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In August 2018, the Department of Health and Human Services reported that it concurs with this recommendation and that CMS is exploring available options to subject accessories essential to the group 3 power wheelchairs in the permanent DMEPOS program to prior authorization. As of February 2020, HHS officials have not informed us of any actions taken to implement this recommendation. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should take steps, based on results from evaluations, to continue prior authorization. These steps could include: (1) resuming the paused home health services demonstration; (2) extending current demonstrations; or, (3) identifying new opportunities for expanding prior authorization to additional items and services with high unnecessary utilization and high improper payment rates. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: In August 2018, the Department of Health and Human Services reported that it concurs with this recommendation. CMS has recently taken steps to evaluate and continue its prior authorization programs. In June 2019, CMS issued a final report on the independent evaluation of the non-emergency hyperbaric oxygen therapy demonstration. While the agency does not plan to conduct additional demonstrations on this service, CMS officials reported in December 2019 that the agency may consider this service for the new prior authorization process for certain hospital outpatient department services, established in a 2019 final rule. In April 2019, CMS issued a Federal Register notice that added 12 items-seven power wheelchairs and five pressure reducing support surfaces-to its required prior authorization list for the permanent program. CMS officials said in December 2019 that the agency was in the process of determining cost savings from this action and that additional items would be added to the list in early 2020. CMS resumed the home health services demonstration with changes in one state in June 2019 and in another state in September 2019. The agency plans to extend the demonstration to three additional states in 2020. In September 2019, CMS extended the repetitive scheduled non-emergency ambulance service demonstration for 1 year, through November 2020. GAO will continue to monitor issued agency guidance on the home health services demonstration and to evaluate additional steps CMS takes to evaluate and continue prior authorization in Medicare, such as determining cost savings from its actions and identifying new opportunities for prior authorization.

Recommendation: The Board should work with SSA to explore options for obtaining data electronically and limiting the reliance of the financial interchange process on manual data entry. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Railroad Retirement Board
Status: Open

Comments: RRB reported taking steps to implement this recommendation. In January 2020, the agency received a cost estimate from SSA for a proposed data exchange. In May 2020, RRB and SSA held an inaugural conference call and reached an understanding of the technical requirements to move forward with a data exchange. As of June 2020, RRB reports that systems analysts at SSA are developing the procedures and systems necessary for an electronic data exchange. GAO will close this recommendation when the data system is implemented.

Recommendation: The Board should produce written documentation on the financial interchange process such that a knowledgeable third party could carry out and replicate its process consistently without further explanation. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Railroad Retirement Board
Status: Open

Comments: As of June 2020, RRB reports that it has been working to draft documentation of the financial interchange calculation process, and sharing drafts of this documentation with SSA for its review. SSA has requested revisions in this documentation and RRB plans to hire additional staff to implement GAO's recommendation. GAO will close this recommendation once RRB finalizes its documentation of the financial interchange calculation process.

Recommendation: The Board should produce formal policies on how the work of staff performing the financial interchange is reviewed. (Recommendation 5)

Agency: Railroad Retirement Board
Status: Open

Comments: As of June 2020, RRB reports that it is in the process of developing formal review policies and plans to include them in its written documentation of the financial interchange process. GAO will close this recommendation once RRB's formal review policy is complete.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of SSA should work with RRB to explore options for electronically sharing data and limiting the reliance of the financial interchange process on manual data entry. (Recommendation 6)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: SSA reported that it received a data exchange request from RRB in October 2018. RRB proposed to send SSA a file of beneficiary and earnings data, and receive calculations for sample financial interchange cases. RRB and SSA discussed options for exchanging information electronically. In early 2020, SSA reported that it is developing a Rough Order of Magnitude/Cost Estimate for electronically sharing data and limiting the reliance of the financial interchange process on manual data entry under its existing agreement. The agency has no timeline to complete this effort.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of SSA should take additional steps to provide oversight of financial interchange calculations at the individual-case level. This could include periodically reviewing a subset of these cases. (Recommendation 7)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: In September 2020, SSA reported that it has developed plans to review of a subset of financial interchange calculations as the individual-case level. SSA anticipates that this review will take place following the completion of RRB's fiscal year 2021-2022 financial interchange calculations. We will close this recommendation once SSA's review successfully takes place.

Recommendation: The Secretary of HHS should, consistent with its existing statutory authority, take additional steps to provide oversight of financial interchange calculations at the individual-case level. If the Secretary concludes that there are limitations in its authority in this area, the Secretary should seek to obtain the necessary additional authority. (Recommendation 8)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Status: Open

Comments: As of July 2020, HHS continues to disagree with this recommendation. HHS officials said that RRB is responsible for certifying its costs through the financial interchange, and that they believe the department lacks the authority to question RRB's calculations. We continue to believe that HHS would be better positioned to ensure that the transfers it makes and receives through the interchange are calculated correctly if it reviews case-level calculations. We will close this recommendation if HHS seeks the authority to review financial interchange calculations or takes other steps to ensure the accuracy of financial interchange calculations performed by RRB.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide written documentation of DOD's approach to developing and approving the TRICARE Select access standards, as well as the final access standards, to Congress. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: To improve RRB's ability to make accurate disability benefit eligibility determinations, including CDRs, and to decrease the potential for making improper payments, Congress should consider granting RRB access to the Department of Health and Human Services' quarterly earnings information from the National Directory of New Hires database. (Matter for Consideration 1)

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: As of March 2020, no legislation has been enacted resulting from this matter to Congress. RRB's (the Board) fiscal year 2020 budget proposal included a legislative proposal to provide the Board access to the NDNH. Although the Board reported that the resulting proposed legislation drafted by HHS - the entity that maintains the NDNH - would, if enacted, provide access to the NDNH, the Board opposed the proposal in part because it would not waive associated fees to access the NDNH, and concluded access to the NDNH would not be cost-effective. In January 2020, the Board informed GAO it is not currently seeking legislation to gain access to the NDNH, resulting in the Board continuing to use earnings data that may be outdated in its continuing disability reviews, but that it may seek access in the future.

Recommendation: To enhance RRB's ability to manage and oversee its CDR program, RRB should routinely compile and analyze CDR program data, such as the number of cases selected for review, the number of beneficiaries in each medical improvement category, outcomes, and the costs and benefits of conducting CDRs, to improve program oversight. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Railroad Retirement Board
Status: Open

Comments: RRB agreed with this recommendation. In June 2020, RRB reported that its Program Evaluation and Management Services (PEMS) section will compile and analyze all relevant CDR program case and cost data to better oversee CDRs. RRB said that its first analysis would cover CDR's adjudicated from April 2019 through September 2020; as of June 2020 they had adjudicated 107 CDR cases. In addition, RRB reported that its monthly reporting on CDRs to the Director of Disability includes information on the type of CDR completed, the medical improvement category for medical CDR, and the disposition of the CDR. In August 2018, the agency had reported that it began reporting in October 2017 weekly pending CDR type action cases to the Director of Programs, and that it had begun tracking CDR reason codes for each medical improvement category. To close this recommendation, RRB will need to include an analysis of the costs and benefits of conducting CDRs, including any overpayments or underpayments processed, and share its complete analysis of CDRs through September 2020 after it is completed. At that point GAO will review the analysis and decide if it provides a sufficient bases for program oversight.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should issue written criteria for when CMS will allow limited evaluation of a demonstration or a portion of a demonstration, including defining conditions, such as what it means for a demonstration to be longstanding or noncomplex, as applicable. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS agreed with this recommendation. In November 2019, HHS reported that it was applying limited evaluation requirements to certain demonstration types, including routine family planning demonstrations. In July 2020, CMS stated that it continues to work with states as they apply for new or extensions of approved demonstrations to determine whether the demonstrations as a whole or certain components would qualify for limited evaluation. The agency, however, reiterated that it needs more experience before developing generalized guidance and that was not a priority for 2020. We will continue to monitor CMS's progress and will review whether to close the recommendation when these criteria are issued.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should provide guidance and clarify requirements regarding the monitoring and reporting of deficiencies that states using home and community-based services (HCBS) waivers are required to report on their annual reports. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: CMS concurred with this recommendation and indicated the agency would provide guidance and clarify requirements regarding the monitoring and reporting of deficiencies in states' annual reports. According to CMS's fiscal year 2021 Budget Justification the agency expects to issue sub-regulatory guidance pertaining to health and welfare of Medicaid beneficiaries in residential facilities by the close of 2020.To fully implement this recommendation, the sub-regulatory guidance should clarify requirements for states' monitoring and reporting of deficiencies in HCBS annual reports. GAO will continue to monitor CMS actions in response to this recommendation.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should establish standard Medicaid reporting requirements for all states to annually report key information on critical incidents, considering, at a minimum, the type of critical incidents involving Medicaid beneficiaries, and the type of residential facilities, including assisted living facilities, where critical incidents occurred. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: HHS neither agreed nor disagreed with this recommendation. According to CMS' fiscal year 2021 Budget Justification, the agency expects to issue sub-regulatory guidance pertaining to health and welfare of Medicaid beneficiaries in residential facilities by the close of 2020. To fully implement this recommendation, the sub-regulatory guidance should establish standard Medicaid reporting requirements for all states to report critical incidents annually. GAO will continue to monitor CMS actions in response to this recommendation.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should ensure that all states submit annual reports for HCBS waivers on time as required. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: CMS concurred with this recommendation and stated that it will review and update its communications with states to reaffirm reporting requirements and ensure that all HCBS annual reports are submitted on time. According to CMS' fiscal year 2021 Budget Justification, the agency expects to issue sub-regulatory guidance pertaining to the health and welfare of Medicaid beneficiaries in residential facilities by the close of 2020. To fully implement this recommendation, the sub-regulatory guidance should ensure that all states submit annual reports on time. GAO will continue to monitor CMS actions in response to this recommendation.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should ensure that all types of Medicaid HCBS programs have requirements for states to avoid or mitigate potential conflicts of interest on the part of entities that conduct needs assessments that are used to determine eligibility for HCBS and to develop HCBS plans of service. These requirements should address both service providers and managed care plans conducting such assessments. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS concurred with our recommendation. However, in an April 2018 update, HHS noted that the recommendation should be closed based on existing Medicaid regulations. GAO disagrees. The existing regulations--which GAO reviewed at the time of this study--do not address all types of Medicaid HCBS programs. For example, specific conflict of interest requirements are generally not in place for needs assessments that are used to inform HCBS eligibility determinations. Similarly, managed care plans may have a financial interest in the outcome of HCBS assessments used for both determining eligibility and service amounts. GAO maintains that states should be required to avoid or mitigate potential conflicts of interest on the part of entities-including both service providers and managed care plans-that perform the needs assessments that states use for eligibility determinations and to develop plans of service. As of December 2019, HHS officials have not informed us of any additional actions taken to ensure that states avoid or mitigate potential conflict of interests in needs assessments for all types of Medicaid HCBS programs. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS, in partnership with the states, should take additional steps to expedite the use of T-MSIS data for program oversight. Such steps should include, but are not limited to, efforts to (1) obtain complete information from all states on unreported T-MSISdata elements and their plans to report applicable data elements; (2) identify and share information across states on known T-MSIS datalimitations to improve data comparability; and (3) implement mechanisms, such as the Learning Collaborative, by whichstates can collaborate on an ongoing basis to improve thecompleteness, comparability, and utility of T-MSIS data.(Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: HHS concurred with this recommendation. As of February 2020, CMS has taken steps to improve T-MSIS data quality, but further efforts are needed to expedite the data's use in oversight. With regard to obtaining complete information from all states, CMS released additional guidance in March 2019, on state compliance with T-MSIS requirements. This guidance includes the need to resolve data issues associated with 12 top priority items and missing data elements, both of which are key for using T-MSIS data. Further, CMS identified an additional 11 top priority items, noting it also expected states to resolve data issues with these items. CMS reports that it has helped resolve data issues related to these 23 top priority items by sending states summary data on compliance with associated reporting requirements. CMS has notified states of their compliance status and asked non-compliant states to submit corrective action plans. However, CMS reports that the level of states' T-MSIS data completeness varies and agency state liaisons and technical assistants continue to work individually with states to identify, prioritize, and resolve key missing data elements. With regard to identifying and sharing information, CMS has made some T-MSIS data available for use through five T-MSIS analytical files, which include data on Medicaid and CHIP enrollment, demographics, service utilization, and payments. Further, CMS has created resources to support researchers in their use of these analytical files, including information on the completeness and accuracy of certain data elements. With regard to implementing mechanisms for collaboration across states, additional CMS action is needed. In particular, CMS's efforts to create a mechanism for states to disseminate information about T-MSIS data and its comparability across states remain limited and the agency has not launched its proposed Learning Collaborative to facilitate ongoing feedback and collaboration. While progress has been made, additional actions, such as establishing mechanisms for ongoing feedback and collaboration across states, are needed to consider this recommendation implemented.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should articulate a specific plan and associated time frames for using T-MSIS data for oversight. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS concurred with this recommendation. As of February 2020, CMS has taken steps to articulate guidance to states, but has not outlined a specific plan and associated time frames for using T-MSIS data for oversight. Until CMS takes these actions, the recommendation remains open.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should provide fraud-awareness training relevant to risks facing CMS programs and require new hires to undergo such training and all employees to undergo training on a recurring basis. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: The agency agreed with this recommendation. In July 2018, CMS reported that it is strengthening its efforts to ingrain fraud risk management principles throughout the Agency and is developing a training video, module, and curriculum to train staff agency-wide on fraud risks. In November 2019, CMS provided fraud-awareness training videos for new and current CMS employees. GAO requested and is awaiting documentation to show mandatory nature and annual frequency of the training in order to assess the extent to which the training is consistent with leading practices in fraud risk management.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should conduct fraud risk assessments for Medicare and Medicaid to include respective fraud risk profiles and plans for regularly updating the assessments and profiles. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: Agency agreed with this recommendation. In July 2018, CMS reported that it has initiated the fraud risk assessment for some programs in Medicare, including the Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program expanded model. CMS also reported that it is also continuing to draft fraud risk profiles for the Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Care model, the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus model, the permanent Medicare Shared Savings Program, and the new Medicare Beneficiary Identifier. Additionally, CMS reported that it is assessing the Quality Payment Program, established by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA), utilizing the GAO fraud risk assessment framework. We will continue to monitor CMS's progress in this area. In November 2019, CMS provided a diagram depicting CMS approach to assessing fraud risks and a document for Home Health Request for Anticipated Payment, stating that fraud risk assessments on Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program and Quality Payment Program are under development. We requested and are awaiting additional information on CMS's approach and plans for conducting fraud risk assessments in Medicare programs, including the reasoning for program selection, overall order, and anticipated timeframes.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should, using the results of the fraud risk assessments for Medicare and Medicaid, create, document, implement, and communicate an antifraud strategy that is aligned with and responsive to regularly assessed fraud risks. This strategy should include an approach for monitoring and evaluation. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: Agency agreed with this recommendation. In November 2019, CMS reported on activities to conduct fraud risk assessments in Medicare programs (see Recommendation 2), however this work is ongoing and the recommendation remains open. Because completion of a fraud risk assessment is necessary before developing an antifraud strategy, this recommendation also remains open. We will continue to monitor CMS's progress in this area.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should require plan sponsors to report to CMS on investigations and other actions taken related to providers who prescribe high amounts of opioids. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS did not concur with this recommendation. As of September 2019, HHS had not provided information on actions taken to implement it. We will update its status when we receive additional information.

Recommendation: To improve CMS's oversight of states' MLTSS programs, the Administrator of CMS should take steps to identify and obtain key information needed to oversee states' efforts to monitor beneficiary access to quality services, including, at a minimum, obtaining information specific to network adequacy, critical incidents, and appeals and grievances.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) agreed with this recommendation. In December 2017, HHS communicated its intent to review regulations and enhance its capacity to measure, monitor, and improve care and quality across a number of domains, including MLTSS. As of February 2020, HHS stated that it is developing guidance related to reporting on key information needed to oversee beneficiary access to care. GAO will continue to monitor the department's actions and any steps taken to address this recommendation.

Recommendation: To enhance USAID's financial oversight of implementing partners' spending to implement and support Title II development and emergency projects, the USAID Administrator should take steps to ensure that it collects complete and consistent monitoring data from implementing partners for Title II development and emergency projects on the use of 202(e) funding for cash transfers, food vouchers, and local and regional procurement as well as data on the use of Title II funding for internal transportation, storage, and handling (ITSH) costs, in accordance with established requirements.

Agency: United States Agency for International Development
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: In December 2017, USAID informed us that new Title II development awards would require partners to adhere to a requirement that it added in July 2017 to the Food for Peace development award template, which requires programs to provide quarterly performance reports on actual cash transfers, food vouchers, and local and regional procurement activities. USAID also noted that it had developed a new WFP emergency award template with reporting requirements for monitoring data on cash transfers, food vouchers, and local and regional procurement activities. In February 2018, USAID provided support that it has developed training and standardized oversight staff roles and responsibilities to help ensure that complete and consistent monitoring data is collected for Title II development and emergency projects. However, USAID still needs to provide evidence that it collects complete and consistent monitoring data from implementing partners for Title II projects, in accordance with established requirements. As of September 2020, we continue to monitor USAID's ongoing actions taken in response to this recommendation.

Recommendation: To improve the collection of complete and consistent personal care services data and better ensure CMS can effectively monitor the states' provision of and spending on Medicaid personal care services, CMS should better ensure that personal care services data collected from states through T-MSIS and MBES comply with CMS reporting requirements.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) concurs with GAO's recommendation. In December 2017, CMS cited ongoing efforts related to claims data submitted by states through T-MSIS, CMS's new claims reporting system. Efforts included validation checks of personal care service claims to ensure that key data are not missing or incorrect. In addition, CMS stated it was working with the states to address concerns that are identified with the quality of claims data submitted. However, as of March 2020, CMS had not reported that it had addressed inaccurate state reporting of expenditures through CMS's expenditure reporting system, Medicaid Budget and Expenditure System (MBES). Complete implementation of the recommended action will better ensure state reporting of claims and expenditures is accurate and will allow CMS to effectively perform key management functions.

Recommendation: To improve the collection of complete and consistent personal care services data and better ensure CMS can effectively monitor the states' provision of and spending on Medicaid personal care services, CMS should develop plans for analyzing and using personal care services data for program management and oversight.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) concurred with this recommendation. However, as of March 2020, CMS had not developed a plan for analyzing and using personal care services data as GAO recommended in January 2017. Developing a plan for analyzing and using personal care services data for program management and oversight is an important step CMS needs to take to improve the oversight and management of personal care services.

Recommendation: To improve oversight of states' payment structures for MLTSS, the Administrator of CMS should require all states to collect and report on progress toward achieving MLTSS program goals, such as whether the program enhances the provision of community-based care.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: As of June 2020, CMS has not informed us of any additional actions taken to implement this recommendation. CMS previously reported that it is working to develop guidance on how states report on progress towards achieving MLTSS program goals, such as the extent to which the program enhances the provision of community-based care. CMS has contracted with a vendor to produce recommendations for what would be included in the state reporting. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.

Recommendation: To improve oversight of states' payment structures for MLTSS, the Administrator of CMS should establish criteria for what situations would warrant exceptions to the federal standards that the data used to set rates be no older than the three most recent and complete years.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: As of June 2020, CMS has not informed us of any additional actions taken to implement this recommendation. CMS previously reported that it has monitored rate certifications and the data used for rating periods starting on or after July 1, 2017. CMS said that it has not had any states set rates that do not meet the federal standards for the data being no older than the three most recent and complete years and, therefore, does not believe that it should publish guidance on what situations would warrant exceptions. In order to better determine whether there is a need for such guidance, we believe that CMS should continue to monitor rate certifications and assess the data being used, particularly as additional states are developing or considering implementation of MLTSS programs. We will update the status of this recommendation as CMS conducts reviews of other states' payment structures and data used to establish them.

Recommendation: To improve oversight of states' payment structures for MLTSS, the Administrator of CMS should provide states with guidance that includes minimum standards for encounter data validation procedures.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: As of June 2020, CMS has not informed us of any additional actions taken to implement this recommendation. CMS previously reported to GAO that it has convened a workgroup to develop an Encounter Data Toolkit, which will provide best practices for encounter data submissions and validation procedures. The workgroup is also discussing minimum standards for states to determine if the encounter data are complete and accurate for purposes of rate setting. The workgroup met in June and July 2018, and two additional workgroup meeting are planned prior to the drafting of the toolkit. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.

Recommendation: To achieve a better understanding of the effect of certain Personal care services (PCS) services on beneficiaries and a more consistent administration of policies and procedures across PCS programs, the Acting Administrator of CMS should collect and analyze states' required information on the impact of the Participant-Directed Option and Community First Choice programs on the health and welfare of beneficiaries as well as the state quality measures for the Participant-Directed Option and Community First Choice programs.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) concurred with GAO's recommendation. On December 30, 2016, the agency issued guidance on the Community First Choice program to assist states in submitting information to CMS on the health and welfare of beneficiaries. In March 2019, CMS officials stated that the agency is currently developing the process for states to report this information to CMS. Agency officials also stated they are exploring the value of collecting this information for the Participant-Directed Option program given the limited number of states currently operating under this authority. In February 2020, CMS officials stated that the agency continues to develop policy related to this recommendation.

Recommendation: To improve the accessibility and reliability of SNF expenditure data, the Acting Administrator of CMS should take steps to improve the accessibility of SNF expenditure data, making it easier for public stakeholders to locate and use the data.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In September 2016, GAO recommended that CMS improve the accessibility and reliability of SNF expenditure data, thereby making it easier for public stakeholders to locate and use the data. The agency concurred with this recommendation in 2016 and stated that it would review the feasibility of increasing the accessibility of this data. However, in August 2017, HHS told GAO that it now believes that the cost of implementing this recommendation would outweigh its benefits. HHS confirmed in July 2019 that its position on this recommendation has not changed. GAO continues to hold that data on SNFs' relative expenditures should be readily accessible to the public to ensure transparency in SNF expenditures.

Recommendation: To improve the accessibility and reliability of SNF expenditure data, the Acting Administrator of CMS should take steps to ensure the accuracy and completeness of SNF expenditure data.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In September 2016, GAO recommended that CMS take steps to ensure the accuracy and completeness of SNF expenditure data. However, the agency did not concur with this recommendation. HHS reported in 2016 that the amount of time and resources to verify the accuracy and completeness of SNF expenditure data could be substantial, without assurance of benefit to the agency and the public. However, during the course of our work, GAO found that CMS uses this expenditure data to update overall SNF payment rates, in addition to more general purposes. GAO continues to believe that CMS should take steps to ensure reliable expenditure data are accurate and complete. As of July 2019, the agency continues to non-concur with this recommendation.

Recommendation: To promote further transparency in measuring the federal government's progress against deficit reduction targets required under current law, the Director of the Office of Management of Budget should identify and publicly report the total amount of actual reductions in budget authority government-wide each year as a result of sequestration or the reduction of discretionary spending limits under BBEDCA.

Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
Status: Open

Comments: In September 2018, OMB staff maintained their position of disagreement with this recommendation as summarized in our April 2016 report. As of January 2020, OMB has not provided any plans to implement this recommendation.

Recommendation: To ensure effective and appropriate recovery of DI overpayments and administration of penalties and sanctions, the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should clarify its policy for assessing the reasonableness of expenses used in determining beneficiaries' repayment amounts to help ensure that withholding plans are consistently established across the agency and accurately reflect individuals' ability to pay.

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: As of June 2020, SSA reported taking a number of steps to address this recommendation. According to SSA, it updated its guidance in 2017 to help ensure that staff consistently process various requests from overpaid individuals. SSA also reported that it is taking additional steps to update instructions on how staff should consider whether expenses reported by individuals are reasonable when approving withholding plans. The agency expects these instructions to be complete by the end of fiscal year 2021. We will close this recommendation once SSA releases additional guidance on assessing the reasonableness of expenses.

Recommendation: To ensure effective and appropriate recovery of DI overpayments and administration of penalties and sanctions, the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should adjust the minimum withholding rate to 10 percent of monthly DI benefits to allow quicker recovery of debt.

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: SSA agreed with this recommendation and in 2017 estimated that this change would result in an additional $213 million in collections over a 5-year period. The fiscal year 2021 President's budget submission contained a legislative proposal to make this change, and budgets since 2017 have contained similar proposals. As of June 2020, SSA reported that it plans to continue to submit similar legislative proposals. SSA also included the proposal in its regulatory agenda, noting that the change can also be implemented via regulatory change. We will close this recommendation once SSA achieves resolution from Congress on its legislative proposal or from its own regulatory efforts.

Recommendation: To ensure effective and appropriate recovery of DI overpayments and administration of penalties and sanctions, the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should consider adjusting monthly withholding amounts according to cost of living adjustments or charging interest on debts being collected by withholding benefits. Should SSA determine that it is necessary to do so, it could pursue legislative authority to use recovery tools that it is currently unable to use.

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: Although SSA initially disagreed with this recommendation, the agency reassessed its response in June 2019 and decided to take additional actions. As of June 2020, SSA is developing a system to track debts (the Debt Management Product) which will have the ability to store, track, and apply interest and penalties to overpayment debts. SSA also reports that it is seeking a regulatory change to clarify procedures to charge interest on debts. While SSA is pursuing these measures to position itself to charge interest on debts, the agency has not yet decided whether it will ultimately do so. We will close this recommendation once SSA makes a decision on how to proceed with charging interest on overpayment debts.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Health and Human Services should direct the Administrator of CMS to assess the feasibility of updating the agency's study on the effect of VA-provided Medicare-covered services on per capita county Medicare FFS spending rates by obtaining VA utilization and diagnosis data for veterans enrolled in Medicare FFS under its existing data use agreement or by other means as necessary.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Status: Open

Comments: In December 2017, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) indicated that it had further reviewed our recommendation and determined that updating the agency's study on the effect of VA-provided Medicare-covered services on per capita county Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) spending rates using the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) utilization and diagnosis data was not feasible. Challenges cited by HHS included (1) pricing each VA encounter using Medicare payment rules; (2) determining which Medicare provider would have treated each beneficiary; and (3) the resources required to have an ongoing data feed with VA and to protect VA utilization and diagnosis data. While we acknowledge that there may be challenges associated with incorporating VA utilization and diagnosis data into HHS's analysis, we believe that HHS needs to do additional work before it can determine whether such an approach is feasible. For example, while HHS noted resource concerns related to sharing and storing sensitive VA data, the agency already receives and stores some VA data. It remains unclear whether HHS has assessed what additional resources would be needed to store VA utilization and diagnosis data and whether such data would need to be shared via an ongoing data feed-another challenge mentioned by HHS. As of June 2020, HHS has not provided us with any additional information about actions it has taken to address this recommendation. We continue to believe that HHS should assess the feasibility of implementing a methodology for estimating the effect of VA-provided Medicare-covered services on per capita county Medicare FFS spending rates that incorporates VA data.

Recommendation: If CMS makes an adjustment to the benchmark to account for VA spending on Medicare-covered services, the Secretary of Health and Human Services should direct the Administrator of CMS to assess whether an additional adjustment to MA payments is needed to ensure that payments to MA plans are equitable for veterans and nonveterans.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Status: Open

Comments: In December 2017, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) indicated that there are a number of limitations that would impede the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) ability to conduct an analysis of veteran versus nonveteran payments to MA plans. HHS indicated that in order to conduct a thorough assessment, CMS would need utilization and diagnosis data from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), which would take several years to collect and analyze. In addition, HHS indicated that if CMS determined an adjustment was needed, the agency would have to overcome other data, operational, and financial challenges related to making the adjustment. As a result, HHS indicated that implementing such an adjustment would be infeasible. However, CMS currently adjusts the benchmark to account for VA spending on Medicare-covered services without VA utilization and diagnosis data. While we agree that VA utilization and diagnosis data may improve the accuracy of an adjustment to MA payments to ensure that payments to MA plans are equitable for veterans and nonveterans, it is unclear why CMS could not make an adjustment without VA utilization and diagnosis data. As of June 2020, HHS has not provided us with any additional information about actions it has taken to address this recommendation. In order for us to close this recommendation, CMS would need to assess whether an additional adjustment to MA payments is needed.

Recommendation: As CMS continues to implement and refine the contract-level RADV audit process to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of reducing and recovering improper payments and to improve the accuracy of CMS's calculation of coding intensity, the Administrator should modify that calculation by taking actions such as the following: (1) including only the three most recent pair-years of risk score data for all contracts; (2) standardizing the changes in disease risk scores to account for the expected increase in risk scores for all MA contracts; (3) developing a method of accounting for diagnostic errors not coded by providers, such as requiring that diagnoses added by MA organizations be flagged as supplemental diagnoses in the agency's Encounter Data System to separately calculate coding intensity scores related only to diagnoses that were added through MA organizations' supplemental record review (that is, were not coded by providers); and (4) including MA beneficiaries enrolled in contracts that were renewed from a different contract under the same MA organization during the pair-year period.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: CMS is working to improve the accuracy of its calculation of coding intensity, as GAO recommended in April 2016. In October 2017, CMS officials told GAO that the agency is reevaluating the design of the risk adjustment data validation audits to ensure their rigor in the context of all the payment error data acquired since the original design of the audits. As part of this work, CMS officials told GAO that the agency will examine whether coding intensity is the best criterion to use to select contracts for audit. As a result, in October 2018, CMS told GAO that rather than coding intensity, it plans to implement a new methodology using payment error as the key sampling driver beginning with audits for payment year 2014. Additionally, CMS was taking steps to modernize its audit system to improve reliability. For example, it initiated a project to explore how to directly receive electronic medical record documentation. As of January 2020, the agency is continuing to reevaluate the design of these audits. Unless CMS takes this and other actions to improve the risk adjustment data validation contract-level audit process, it will fail to recover improper payments of hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

Recommendation: As CMS continues to implement and refine the contract-level RADV audit process to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of reducing and recovering improper payments. The Administrator should modify CMS's selection of contracts for contract-level RADV audits to focus on those contracts most likely to have high rates of improper payments by taking actions such as the following: (1) selecting more contracts with the highest coding intensity scores; (2) excluding contracts with low coding intensity scores; (3) selecting contracts with high rates of unsupported diagnoses in prior contract-level RADV audits; (4) if a contract with a high rate of unsupported diagnoses is no longer in operation, selecting a contract under the same MA organization that includes the service area of the prior contract; and (5) selecting some contracts with high enrollment that also have either high rates of unsupported diagnoses in prior contract-level RADV audits or high coding intensity scores.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: CMS is working to modify the selection of MA contracts for audit, as GAO recommended in April 2016. In October 2017, CMS officials told GAO that the initial RADV audit design was based on a limited set of payment error data available at the time. As part of efforts to improve the audits, CMS officials told GAO that the agency will examine whether coding intensity is the best criterion to select contracts for audit. In October 2018, CMS told GAO that it plans to implement a new methodology using payment error as the key sampling driver-rather than coding intensity-beginning with audits for payment year 2014. As of January 2020, the agency is using the revised methodology on the 2014 and 2015 payment year audits. They expect to conclude this process in late fiscal year 2020 and 2021, respectively. Unless CMS completes actions to improve the RADV contract-level audit process, it will fail to recover improper payments of hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

Recommendation: As CMS continues to implement and refine the contract-level RADV audit process to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of reducing and recovering improper payments. The Administrator should enhance the timeliness of CMS's contract-level RADV process by taking actions such as the following: (1) closely aligning the time frames in CMS's contract-level RADV audits with those of the national RADV audits the agency uses to estimate the MA improper payment rate; (2) reducing the time between notifying MA organizations of contract audit selection and notifying them about the beneficiaries and diagnoses that will be audited; (3) improving the reliability and performance of the agency's process for transferring medical records from MA organizations, including assessing the feasibility of updating Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation for use in transferring medical records in contract-level RADV audits; and (4) requiring that CMS contract-level RADV auditors complete their medical record reviews within a specific number of days comparable to other medical record review time frames in the Medicare program.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: HHS concurred with this recommendation in its fiscal year 2021 budget justification. HHS reaffirmed its commitment to identifying and correcting improper payments in the MA program. It has begun taking steps to improve the timeliness of the contract-level RADV audit process, such as aligning the time frames in CMS's contract-level RADV audits with those of the national RADV audits. Once completed, CMS needs to provide evidence that the actions taken by the agency have enhanced the timeliness of CMS's contract-level RADV process.

Recommendation: As CMS continues to implement and refine the contract-level RADV audit process to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of reducing and recovering improper payments. The Administrator should improve the timeliness of CMS's contract-level RADV appeal process by requiring that reconsideration decisions be rendered within a specified number of days comparable to other medical record review and first-level appeal time frames in the Medicare program.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: CMS is working to improve the timeliness of the agency's contract-level risk adjustment data validation appeals process, as GAO recommended in April 2016. In October 2017, CMS officials told GAO that the agency is actively considering options for expediting the appeals process. For example, CMS is considering the appropriate number of days for rendering reconsideration decisions while allowing for a complete and thorough adjudication. In December 2019, CMS officials told GAO they expect to issue a final rule in January 2021 that will establish uniform timelines to expedite the appeals process. Specifically, they plan to require that a findings determination be made within 60-90 days of an arbiter's receipt of each party's arguments at each stage of an appeal. Unless CMS takes such actions to improve the risk adjustment data validation contract-level audit process, it will fail to recover improper payments of hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

Recommendation: As CMS continues to implement and refine the contract-level RADV audit process to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of reducing and recovering improper payments. The Administrator should ensure that CMS develops specific plans and a timetable for incorporating a RAC in the MA program as mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: CMS has attempted to incorporate a recovery audit contractor in the Medicare Advantage program, as GAO recommended in April 2016. After failing to receive any proposals when CMS first issued a request for proposals (RFP) in 2014, CMS issued a request for information to industry in December 2015, which included a draft Statement of Work to solicit feedback, gauge interest, and conduct market research regarding CMS entering into a contract with a recovery audit contractor to identify underpayments and overpayments associated with diagnosis data submitted to CMS by Medicare Advantage Organizations. CMS reported that it subsequently issued another RFP in 2016 and did not receive any proposals for a second time. In December 2019, CMS officials told GAO that the functions of the Part C recovery Audit programs are being performed through other program integrity mechanisms. CMS subsequently reported in its fiscal year 2021 budget justification that CMS believes the proposed scope of the Part C RAC has been subsumed by RADV and CMS will demonstrate that the RADV program satisfies this recommendation. Until CMS completes efforts to improve the risk adjustment data validation contract-level audit process and demonstrates that it has satisfied the requirement to incorporate a recovery audit contractor in the MA program, CMS will fail to recover improper payments of hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

Recommendation: To ensure states have appropriate and current guidance to assist them in designing and administering Medicaid NEMT, the Secretary of HHS should direct CMS to assess current Medicaid NEMT guidance and update that guidance as needed.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Status: Open

Comments: As of July 2019, HHS officials reported that they are waiting for a policy decision from leadership concerning non-emergency medical transportation. GAO will continue to monitor and update the status of this recommendation.

Recommendation: In order to prevent the shift of services from physician offices to HOPDs from increasing costs for the Medicare program and beneficiaries, Congress should consider directing the Secretary of HHS to equalize payment rates between settings for E/M office visits--and other services that the Secretary deems appropriate--and to return the associated savings to the Medicare program.

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, enacted in November 2015, partially addressed our recommendation as it limits certain providers from billing at higher hospital outpatient department payment rates. Specifically, the legislation excludes services furnished by off-campus hospital outpatient departments from reimbursement under Medicare's hospital outpatient prospective payment system, effective January 1, 2017. According to the Congressional Budget Office, this action saves the Medicare program $9.3 billion over 10 years. However, the Act does not apply to services furnished by providers billing as hospital outpatient departments prior to enactment of the legislation-which includes providers billing as hospital outpatient departments during the study period in our report-as well as hospital outpatient departments located on hospital campuses. This means that, even in 2017 and beyond, many providers will not be affected by the Act, and Medicare will continue to pay more than necessary for certain services. In November 2018, CMS issued a final rule adopting payment changes-that have since been partially overturned under a decision by a federal district court, which CMS has appealed-capping payment rates for certain services furnished by the off-campus hospital outpatient departments that existed or were under construction in 2015 at the physician fee schedule rate. Since these services furnished by these off-campus hospital outpatient departments were paid under a higher rate, the payment cap, which was to be implemented over 2 years, was intended to equalize payment rates for certain clinical visits between settings. In 2019, CMS applied 50 percent of the payment reduction and in 2020 and subsequent years planned to apply 100 percent of the payment reduction. The rule applied to specific clinical visits; and other services would continue to be paid at the higher rate. However, a federal district court overturned the payment cap in September 2019. CMS has appealed that ruling and adopted a final rule in November 2019 that will implement the payment reduction in 2020. A lawsuit challenging the November 2019 final rule has been filed.

Recommendation: To further ensure the effective screening of work reports, SSA should monitor its process for handling work reports to determine whether staff are taking action on work reports in accordance with proper procedures, and provide feedback to staff as needed.

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: SSA continues to disagree with this recommendation as of December 2019. As we reported, when SSA accepts a beneficiary's return to work allegation (work report), staff have 30 days to determine whether additional action is needed, such as a continuing disability review (CDR) to assess continued eligibility and determine whether benefits should be adjusted. However, not all work reports result in a CDR, and GAO reported that SSA lacks an oversight process to help determine whether work reports are not resulting in CDRs when they should. SSA continues to maintain that its staff carefully review work reports and make independent determinations on the need for a CDR. Absent an oversight process to ensure that work reports are properly screened, SSA may be missing opportunities to prevent overpayments for unreported work. SSA further reported that it may decide to complete a CDR through alternative approaches, such as its Continuing Disability Review Enforcement Operation process using Internal Revenue Service data, its Quarterly Earnings Project using Office of Child Support Enforcement data, or its analysis of electronically reported wages. However, SSA did not indicate whether these alternative avenues for conducting CDRs could identify errors made by its staff handling work reports and result in feedback. Implementing this recommendation will help ensure that SSA staff appropriately take action on work reports.

Recommendation: To enhance beneficiary understanding of work reporting requirements, SSA should: (a) Clarify work reporting requirements provided to beneficiaries. (b) Explore options for increasing the frequency of reporting reminders to DI beneficiaries, similar to those currently available to SSI recipients.

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: As of December 2019, SSA reported taking several steps to clarify work reporting requirements. For instance, SSA reported it has developed outreach materials to share information with beneficiaries and advocacy groups. However, SSA has not provided sufficient documentation for GAO to determine if it has clarified issues identified in GAO's 2015 report, such as how and when to report work, and that beneficiaries may have to repay overpayments that occur even when they report work. Finally, SSA has not indicated whether it has assessed options for increasing the frequency of reporting reminders to DI beneficiaries. Until SSA can demonstrate that it has improved the clarity of its work reporting requirements and frequency of its work reporting reminders, DI beneficiaries may continue to incur overpayments, or be required to repay overpayments that occurred even though they reported work.

Recommendation: To improve its oversight of network adequacy in MA, the Administrator of CMS should augment MA network adequacy criteria to address provider availability.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS concurred with this recommendation, and noted in a February 2018 update that CMS requires MAOs to identify provider availability in certain circumstances, such as in granting exceptions to the agency's network adequacy criteria. CMS also stated that it would consider augmenting MA network adequacy criteria to address provider availability in future years. However, CMS's 2018 MA network adequacy guidance stated that the agency does not currently consider provider availability when reviewing an organization's network adequacy, and this guidance was not updated in 2019. As a result, as of September 2019, agency officials have not implemented this recommendation.

Recommendation: To improve its oversight of network adequacy in MA, the Administrator of CMS should verify provider information submitted by MAOs to ensure validity of the Health Services Delivery data.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS concurred with this recommendation, and noted in a February 2018 update that the agency has standardized existing protocols to ensure the validity of the Health Services Delivery data submitted by MAOs with regards to exceptions requests and partial county justifications. However, CMS's 2018 MA network adequacy guidance stated that MAOs remain responsible for conducting validation of Health Services Delivery data. Unless CMS verifies provider information submitted by MAOs, the agency cannot be confident that MAOs are meeting network adequacy criteria. As of September 2019, agency officials have not implemented this recommendation.

Recommendation: To improve its oversight of network adequacy in MA, the Administrator of CMS should set minimum requirements for MAO letters notifying enrollees of provider terminations and require MAOs to submit sample letters to CMS for review.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS concurred with this recommendation. In a September 2017 update, the agency stated that it had met the spirit of our recommendation by adding its best practice suggestions of what should be included in the written termination notice to the Medicare Managed Care Manual. However, as we noted in our report, those practices are not required, nor are the letters regularly reviewed. As of September 2019, agency officials have not yet implemented this recommendation.

Recommendation: To improve SSA's ability to detect, prevent, and recover potential DI benefit overpayments due to the concurrent receipt of FECA benefits, the Commissioner of Social Security should strengthen internal controls designed to prevent DI overpayments due to the concurrent receipt of FECA benefits by implementing the alternative that provides the greatest net benefits.

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: As of January 2020, SSA had taken steps to strengthen internal controls, as GAO recommended in July 2015, but it had not completed its efforts. In January 2020, SSA told GAO that it continues to work with DOL to establish a computer matching agreement to support the FECA data exchange and the agreement is pending at DOL for final review and signature. According to SSA, if the agreement is established, SSA will use the FECA benefit data to improve efficiencies in its ability to offset/reduce DI benefits when an individual is concurrently receiving FECA benefits. GAO will continue to monitor SSA's work in this area. SSA following through with these plans will help the agency identify and prevent potential DI overpayments.

Recommendation: To help ensure the financial sustainability of the Medicare program, protect beneficiaries from unwarranted financial burden, and address potential concerns about the appropriateness of the health care provided to Part B beneficiaries, Congress should consider eliminating the incentive to prescribe more drugs or more expensive drugs than necessary to treat Medicare Part B beneficiaries at 340B hospitals.

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: As of June 2020, Congress had not acted on this Matter for Congressional Consideration.

Recommendation: To improve the transparency and accountability of HHS's section 1115 Medicaid demonstration approval process, and to ensure that federal Medicaid funds for the demonstrations do not duplicate other federal funds, the Secretary of Health and Human Services should issue criteria for assessing whether section 1115 expenditure authorities are likely to promote Medicaid objectives.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Status: Open

Comments: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) partially concurred with this recommendation and has taken some steps to address the problems GAO identified. Initially, in August 2015, HHS posted on its website general criteria for assessing whether Medicaid section 1115 demonstration expenditure authorities are likely to promote Medicaid objectives, but GAO found the general criteria were not sufficiently specific. HHS later removed these criteria from its website and replaced them with six broad areas of reform that HHS encourages states to consider. As of January 2020, HHS does not have specific criteria for approving section 1115 expenditure authorities, but officials noted that the agency had begun including in approval letters the agency's rationale for approving specific expenditure authorities. GAO considers this a positive step towards improving the transparency of HHS's approval decisions, and if implemented consistently would address the intent of GAO's recommendation. HHS officials indicated that this step would be included in written protocols the agency is drafting but did not have a date for their completion. If these protocols are completed and consistently implemented, HHS's bases for its approvals of expenditure authorities, which can amount to billions of dollars in federal spending, will be more transparent. We will continue to monitor HHS's actions in response to this recommendation.

Recommendation: To improve the transparency and accountability of HHS's section 1115 Medicaid demonstration approval process, and to ensure that federal Medicaid funds for the demonstrations do not duplicate other federal funds, the Secretary of Health and Human Services should ensure the application of these criteria is documented in all HHS's approvals of section 1115 demonstrations, including those approving new or extending or modifying existing expenditure authorities, to inform internal and external stakeholders, including states, the public, and Congress, of the basis for the agency's determinations that approved expenditure authorities are likely to promote Medicaid objectives.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Status: Open

Comments: HHS agreed with this recommendation and, as of January 2020, had taken some steps to ensure that the bases for its approval decisions are documented in all approvals of section 1115 demonstrations. In December 2017, HHS's Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a letter to state Medicaid officials, stating it had begun requesting additional documentation of the demonstration purposes being served by certain types of previously approved funding in demonstration proposals. Additionally, the agency noted it was taking certain steps to ensure that only allowable costs were matched by federal Medicaid funds. In April 2018, CMS officials stated that the agency had begun addressing in approval documents how each intervention proposed by the state was determined to be likely to promote Medicaid objectives. Officials reported that this step would be included in formal written protocols that outline the agency's procedures for application review and preparation of approval documents for section 1115 demonstrations, but as of January 2020, the agency did not have time frames for the completion of these protocols. If CMS completes and implements the written protocols, stakeholders should be able to more easily and consistently assess the agency's decisions. We will continue to monitor CMS's efforts in this area.

Recommendation: To help the Department of Health and Human Services better control spending and encourage efficient delivery of care, Congress should consider requiring Medicare to pay PCHs as it pays PPS teaching hospitals, or provide the Secretary with the authority to otherwise modify how Medicare pays PCHs. To generate cost savings from any reduction in outpatient payments to PCHs, Congress should also provide that all forgone outpatient payment adjustment amounts be returned to the Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund.

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: As of March 2020, no legislative action had been identified that changes how PCHs are paid for inpatient services, as GAO suggested in February 2015. The 21st Century Cures Act-Pub. L. No. 114-255, ?16002, 130 Stat. 1033, 1325 (2016), enacted in December 2016-slightly reduces the additional payments to PCHs for outpatient services furnished on or after January 1, 2018, and returns savings to the Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund. However, the law does not substantively change how PCHs are paid for outpatient services, which differs from how Medicare pays PPS teaching hospitals. Until Medicare pays these cancer hospitals in a way that encourages greater efficiency, Medicare remains at risk for overspending.

Recommendation: To improve consumers' access to relevant and understandable information on the cost and quality of health care services, the Secretary of HHS should direct the Administrator of CMS to include in the CMS Compare websites, to the extent feasible, estimated out-of-pocket costs for Medicare beneficiaries for common treatments that can be planned in advance.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Status: Open

Comments: As of September 2019, HHS officials have not informed us of any actions taken to implement this recommendation. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.

Recommendation: To improve consumers' access to relevant and understandable information on the cost and quality of health care services, the Secretary of HHS should direct the Administrator of CMS to organize cost and quality information in the CMS Compare websites to facilitate consumer identification of the highest-performing providers, such as by listing providers in order based on their performance.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Status: Open

Comments: As of September 2019, HHS officials have not informed us of any actions taken to implement this recommendation. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.

Recommendation: To improve consumers' access to relevant and understandable information on the cost and quality of health care services, the Secretary of HHS should direct the Administrator of CMS to include in the CMS Compare websites the capability for consumers to customize the information presented, to better focus on information relevant to them.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Status: Open

Comments: As of September 2019, HHS officials have not informed us of any actions taken to implement this recommendation. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.

Recommendation: To improve consumers' access to relevant and understandable information on the cost and quality of health care services, the Secretary of HHS should direct the Administrator of CMS to develop specific procedures and performance metrics to ensure that CMS's efforts to promote the development and use of its own and others' transparency tools adequately address the needs of consumers.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Status: Open

Comments: As of September 2019, HHS officials have not informed us of any actions taken to implement this recommendation. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.

Recommendation: To ensure that MA encounter data are of sufficient quality for their intended purposes, the Administrator of CMS should establish specific plans and time frames for using the data for all intended purposes in addition to risk adjusting payments to MAOs.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: HHS generally agreed with this recommendation. Although CMS reports using MA encounter data for purposes other than risk adjustment, as of February 2020, it has not fully developed specific plans and time frames with dates for all uses. CMS reports that it has begun testing the use of MA encounter data for public health purposes, such as identifying beneficiaries with a history of opioid-related overdose and with other conditions, such as cancer and sickle cell. Further, CMS uses MA encounter data to help identify beneficiaries at risk in areas affected by public health emergencies. CMS reports that its Office of the Actuary (OACT) has used MA encounter data to analyze MA beneficiary utilization of certain Part B drugs. Further, OACT reports that it intends to assess other areas where it could use MA encounter data, such as analyses comparing Medicare fee-for-service and MA. As of February 2020, the agency has not developed specific plans and time frames for this and other intended purposes. For example, although CMS intends to use MA encounter data for program integrity purposes, it has not yet developed specific plans and time frames to do so. We will continue to monitor CMS's progress in developing specific plans and time frames with dates for all intended purposes of MA encounter data.

Recommendation: To ensure that MA encounter data are of sufficient quality for their intended purposes, the Administrator of CMS should complete all the steps necessary to validate the data, including performing statistical analyses, reviewing medical records, and providing MAOs with summary reports on CMS's findings, before using the data to risk adjust payments or for other intended purposes.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: HHS generally agreed with this recommendation, however, HHS did not commit to completing data validation before using MA encounter data for risk adjustment. As of February 2020, CMS has continued to make progress in examining the completeness and accuracy of MA encounter data, but more work remains to fully validate these data. CMS has developed and is implementing an MA Encounter Data Integrity and Monitoring plan, which includes data analysis, guidance, and monitoring. As part of this plan, CMS has established preliminary performance metrics for MA encounter data completeness and accuracy. CMS is also conducting analyses related to accuracy and completeness, but has not established performance benchmarks for these analyses. While the agency plans to communicate findings from the analyses to Medicare Advantage organizations, it has not yet done so. Finally, CMS has not verified MA Encounter data by reviewing medical records. While these steps are encouraging, without fully validating the completeness and accuracy of MA encounter data, CMS would be unable to confidently use these data for risk adjustment or other program management or policy purposes.

Recommendation: To eliminate unnecessary program duplication and to achieve increased efficiencies and potential savings within the integrated MHS, Congress should terminate the Secretary of Defense's authority to contract with the USFHP designated providers in a manner consistent with a reasonable transition of affected USFHP enrollees into TRICARE's regional managed care program or other health care programs, as appropriate.

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: As of April 2017, no actions have been taken.

Recommendation: To increase beneficiaries' awareness of providers' financial interest in a particular treatment, Congress should consider directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to require providers who self-refer IMRT services to disclose to their patients that they have a financial interest in the service.

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: In August 2013, to increase beneficiaries' awareness of providers' financial interest in a particular treatment, we suggested that Congress should consider directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to require providers who self-refer IMRT services to disclose to their patients that they have a financial interest in the service. As of June 2020, Congress has not implemented this suggestion.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should insert a self-referral flag on its Medicare Part B claims form, require providers to indicate whether the IMRT service for which a provider bills Medicare is self-referred, and monitor the effects that self-referral has on costs and beneficiary treatment selection.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In August 2013, we recommended that the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) insert a self-referral flag on its Medicare Part B claims form, require providers to indicate whether the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) service for which a provider bills Medicare is self-referred, and monitor the effects that self-referral has on costs and beneficiary treatment selection. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) did not concur with this recommendation, noting that CMS does not believe that this recommendation will address overutilization that occurs as a result of self-referral, would be complex to administer, and may have unintended consequences. We continue to believe that such a flag on Part B claims would likely be the easiest and most cost-effective way for CMS to identify self-referred IMRT services and monitor the effects of self-referral. As of June 2020, CMS has not provided any additional information about actions it has taken to address this recommendation.

Recommendation: In order to improve CMS's ability to identify self-referred anatomic pathology services and help CMS avoid unnecessary increases in these services, the Administrator of CMS should insert a self-referral flag on Medicare Part B claim forms and require providers to indicate whether the anatomic pathology services for which the provider bills Medicare are self-referred or not.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In June 2013, we recommended that the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) insert a self-referral flag on Medicare Part B claim forms and require providers to indicate whether the anatomic pathology services for which the provider bills Medicare are self-referred or not. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) did not concur with this recommendation, noting that CMS does not believe that this recommendation will address overutilization that occurs as a result of self-referral. Although CMS has taken initial steps relevant to self-referral, the steps do not require a provider to indicate whether anatomic pathology services billed to Medicare are self-referred or not. Specifically, CMS has noted that Section 6409(a) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act required the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, in cooperation with the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, to establish a Medicare self-referral disclosure protocol that sets forth a process to enable providers of services and suppliers to self-disclose actual or potential violations of the physician self-referral statute. However, the protocol is voluntary and specific to actual or potential violations regarding self-referral, which is not relevant to our recommendation. As of January 2020, CMS has not provided any additional information about actions it has taken to address our recommendation. We continue to believe that inserting a flag on Part B claims to indicate whether an anatomic pathology service is self-referred would improve CMS's ability to monitor self-referred services, which in turn may help them take action to avoid unnecessary increases in these services.

Recommendation: In order to improve CMS's ability to identify self-referred anatomic pathology services and help CMS avoid unnecessary increases in these services, the Administrator of CMS should determine and implement an approach to ensure the appropriateness of biopsy procedures performed by self-referring providers.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In June 2013, we recommended that the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) implement an approach to ensure the appropriateness of biopsy procedures performed by self-referring providers. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) did not concur with this recommendation and does not believe it would address overutilization that occurs as a result of self-referral. In November 2017, CMS officials noted that the agency does not have the ability to identify self-referred anatomic pathology services during medical reviews. As of January 2020, CMS has not provided any additional information about actions it has taken to address the recommendation. We continue to believe that it is important for CMS to monitor the self-referral of anatomic pathology services on an ongoing basis and determine if those services are inappropriate or unnecessary.

Recommendation: In order to improve CMS's ability to identify self-referred anatomic pathology services and help CMS avoid unnecessary increases in these services, the Administrator of CMS should develop and implement a payment approach for anatomic pathology services that would limit the financial incentives associated with referring a higher number of specimens--or anatomic pathology services--per biopsy procedure.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: In June 2013, we recommended that the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) develop and implement a payment approach for anatomic pathology services under the Physician Fee Schedule that would limit the financial incentives associated with referring a higher number of specimens--anatomic pathology services--per biopsy procedure. Although health care providers have discretion in determining the number of tissue samples from biopsy procedures that become specimens (anatomic pathology services), CMS's current payment system under the Physician Fee Schedule provides a financial incentive for providers to refer more specimens per biopsy procedure. Specifically, CMS pays for each specimen that a provider submits to be analyzed. HHS indicated that it concurred with our recommendation and that it had addressed this recommendation by reducing payment for the most commonly furnished anatomic pathology service (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code 88305) by approximately 30 percent in calendar year 2013. However, CMS's payment reduction did not change the financial incentive providers have to refer more specimens per biopsy procedure because they will still be paid separately for each specimen submitted. As of January 2020, CMS has not provided any additional information about actions it has taken to limit the financial incentives associated with referring a higher number of specimens. We continue to believe that CMS should develop a payment approach that addresses this incentive.

Recommendation: To reduce the incentive for facilities to restrict their service provision to avoid reaching the LVPA treatment threshold, the Administrator of CMS should consider revisions such as changing the LVPA to a tiered adjustment.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: As of February 2020, CMS had not implemented this recommendation. CMS stated in February 2020 that the agency had extensive discussions with the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission regarding the Commission's suggestions for modifying the LVPA. CMS also stated that the agency was analyzing the design of the LVPA as part of its evaluation of the ESRD Prospective Payment System. This recommendation remains open because CMS has not provided documentation of steps such as those described above that the agency has taken to consider revisions to the LVPA. We will update the status of this recommendation upon receipt of additional information from CMS.

Recommendation: To better ensure that federal investments effectively address the remaining airport noise problem and to more fully demonstrate the results of AIP noise grants, the Secretary of Transportation should direct FAA to establish a strategic noise reduction goal that aligns with the nature and extent of airport noise and targets the agency's noise grant program.

Agency: Department of Transportation
Status: Open

Comments: In August 2019, FAA officials stated that the FAA's overall noise reduction goal is fundamentally separate from noise mitigation. At the same time, FAA indicated that airport noise is a growing concern and highlighted multiple aspects of the agency's noise-related activities, including providing community workshops associated with changes to air traffic procedures and continued support for noise compatibility planning by airports. The noise grant program continues to be FAA's largest noise-related activity. Until FAA aligns its strategic noise goal with the noise grant program, it is difficult to see how this program's results contribute to the achieving agency objectives.

Recommendation: To better ensure that federal investments effectively address the remaining airport noise problem and to more fully demonstrate the results of AIP noise grants, the Secretary of Transportation should direct FAA to establish performance measures to assess progress toward this goal that better demonstrate the results of the program and provide Congress and FAA's program managers with information to gauge progress and make programmatic decisions.

Agency: Department of Transportation
Status: Open

Comments: In August 2019, FAA officials stated that the FAA's overall noise reduction goal is fundamentally separate from noise mitigation. Absent FAA actions to align this goal with the noise grant program, FAA cannot develop measurements of noise grant program results that gauge progress towards such a goal. Without this information, Congress and FAA program managers cannot make fully informed decisions about what the noise grant program can reasonably be expected to address in the future and the extent to which noise exposure remains a constraint on airport growth.

Recommendation: To clarify IT requirements within the Executive Agreement, to enable VA and DOD to make an informed recommendation about whether the FHCC should continue after the end of the demonstration, and to provide useful information for other integrations that may be considered in the future, the Secretaries of Veterans Affairs and Defense should develop plans with clear definitions and specific deliverables, including time frames for two IT capabilities-documentation of patient care to support medical and dental operational readiness and outpatient appointment enhancements-and formalize these plans, for example, by incorporating them into the Executive Agreement.

Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
Status: Open

Comments: We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information. As of September 2019, VA and DOD officials have not provided information or documentation to address this recommendation.

Recommendation: To clarify IT requirements within the Executive Agreement, to enable VA and DOD to make an informed recommendation about whether the FHCC should continue after the end of the demonstration, and to provide useful information for other integrations that may be considered in the future, the Secretaries of Veterans Affairs and Defense should develop plans with clear definitions and specific deliverables, including time frames for two IT capabilities-documentation of patient care to support medical and dental operational readiness and outpatient appointment enhancements-and formalize these plans, for example, by incorporating them into the Executive Agreement.

Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open

Comments: We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information. As of September 2019, VA and DOD officials have not provided information or documentation to address this recommendation.

Recommendation: To further align Medicare beneficiary use of preventive services with Task Force recommendations, Congress may wish to consider requiring beneficiaries who receive services with a grade of 'D" to share the cost, notwithstanding that cost sharing may not be required for other beneficiaries receiving the same services.

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: As of June 2020, Congress has not yet taken action to require beneficiaries who receive services with a Task Force grade of "D" to share the cost.

Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should take steps to better align Medicare beneficiary use of preventive services with Task Force recommendations, including providing coverage of services with an 'A" or 'B" grade for the recommended population and at the recommended frequency, as she determines is appropriate considering cost-effectiveness and other criteria.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: CMS has noted that it extended Medicare coverage for several additional preventive services, and that it continues to review the Task Force's recommendations. Specifically, the agency noted that it closely monitors Task Force updates and attends relevant meetings so that alignment with the Medicare population can be considered. However, until CMS implements a systematic process within routine coverage determination steps to regularly consider Task Force guidelines, beneficiaries remain at risk for unnecessary coverage limitations. As of October 2019, CMS officials have not implemented this recommendation and GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.

Recommendation: To help ensure appropriate payments to MA plans, the Administrator of CMS should take steps to improve the accuracy of the adjustment made for differences in diagnostic coding practices between MA and Medicare FFS. Such steps could include, for example, accounting for additional beneficiary characteristics, including the most current data available, identifying and accounting for all years of coding differences that could affect the payment year for which an adjustment is made, and incorporating the trend of the impact of coding differences on risk scores.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open
Priority recommendation

Comments: CMS indicated in January 2020 that it has no plans to take further action regarding our recommendation. CMS stated that, given the complexity of measuring coding changes attributable to plan behavior and the difficulty of measuring countervailing factors, there is not a single correct factor within the viable range of adjustment factors. In addition, the agency noted that there is policy discretion with respect to the appropriate adjustment factor for the payment year. In the Medicare Advantage Call Letter of April 2019, CMS stated that it will apply the statutory minimum adjustment of 5.90 percent for calendar year 2020. As of February 2020, CMS had not provided any documentation of its analysis and the basis for its determination. Although the application of the 5.90 percent adjustment and other recent changes CMS has made to its methodology for calculating the diagnostic coding adjustment (i.e., the exclusion of diagnosis codes that were differentially reported in Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage) likely brings CMS's adjustment closer to what GAO's analysis projects to be an accurate adjustment, a modified methodology that incorporates more recent data, accounts for all relevant years of coding differences, and incorporates the effect of coding difference trends would better ensure an accurate adjustment in future years. Until CMS shows the sufficiency of the diagnostic coding adjustment or implements an adjustment based on analysis using an updated methodology, payments to Medicare Advantage plans may not accurately account for differences in diagnostic coding between these plans and traditional Medicare providers.

Recommendation: To ensure that federal funding efficiently and effectively responds to the countercyclical nature of the Medicaid program, Congress may wish to consider enacting an FMAP formula that is targeted for variable state Medicaid needs and provides automatic, timely, and temporary increased FMAP assistance in response to national economic downturns.

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: As of September 2020, no legislation had been enacted. GAO has testified on at least one bill that had been introduced in the Congress that would implement this Matter for Congressional Consideration. On February 10, 2016, GAO testified on considerations related to the Medicaid funding formula. See Medicaid: Changes to Funding Formula Could Improve Allocation of Funds to States GAO-16-377T January 26, 2016. We also cited this report in our discussion on Medicaid funding during economic downturns in Medicaid: Key Policy and Data Considerations for Designing a Per Capita Cap on Federal Funding (GAO-16-726). We cited this Matter in Opportunities to Improve the Federal Recovery and Response Efforts (GAO-20-625) and in COVID-19: Brief Update on Initial Federal Response to the Pandemic (GAO-20-708).

Recommendation: To help ensure that Medicare beneficiaries have access to high-quality dialysis care, the Administrator of CMS should assess the extent to which the bundled payment for dialysis care will be sufficient to cover an efficient dialysis organization's costs to provide such care when the bundled payment expands to cover oral-only ESRD drugs. The Administrator should conduct this assessment before implementing this expanded bundled payment.

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Status: Open

Comments: CMS, as required by the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (PAMA), delayed until 2024 when the bundled payment for dialysis care is expanded to cover oral-only ESRD drugs. Because PAMA requires CMS to use the most recent year of data available to implement this payment change, CMS has been unable to implement our recommendation. We will update the status of this recommendation upon receipt of additional information from CMS.

Recommendation: To ensure that savings are realized from the implementation of an MPPR or other policies that reflect efficiencies occurring when services are furnished together, Congress may wish to consider exempting these savings from budget neutrality.

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: Congress has exempted savings from the implementation of multiple procedure payment reductions (MPPR) for certain diagnostic imaging and therapy services from the budget neutrality requirement, as GAO suggested in July 2009. However, as of January 2020, other policies that may result in a reduction in payments for the professional component for imaging services remained subject to budget neutrality; "savings" from these services are redistributed to other services and do not accrue to the Medicare program. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016 revised the payment reduction for the professional component of multiple diagnostic imaging services from 25 percent to 5 percent beginning on January 1, 2017, and exempted the reduced expenditures attributable to this MPPR from the budget neutrality provision. MPPRs or other policies that may result in a reduction to payments for the technical component for diagnostic cardiovascular and ophthalmology services continue to be subject to budget neutrality for 2020. Unless Congress exempts from the budget neutrality requirement savings realized from the implementation of all MPPRs or other policies that reflect efficiencies occurring when services are furnished together, these savings will not accrue to the Medicare program.