Recommendation: EBSA should explore ways to collect information on fees charged to participants or alternate payees by a retirement plan—including plan service provider fees the plan passes on to participants—for review and qualification of domestic relations orders and evaluate the burden of doing so. For example, DOL could consider collecting fee information as part of existing reporting requirements in the Form 5500. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Labor
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: EBSA should take steps to ensure that information regarding the requirements for QDROs is available and easily accessible for participants and alternate payees. For example, EBSA could develop a checklist of documents and information that parties could use to help draft a domestic relations order that would be more likely to be qualified as a QDRO on a plan administrator's first review. In addition, EBSA could conduct outreach focused on QDROs to practitioners, such as members of the family bar who may draft domestic relations orders. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Labor
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The IRS Commissioner should develop specific instructions within the Internal Revenue Manual, the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Audit Techniques Guide, or other IRS training material to aid examiners in obtaining and evaluating information they can use to determine whether there exists a restricted period with respect to a company with a single-employer defined benefit plan and if a company with a single-employer defined benefit plan has, during a restricted period, set aside assets for the purpose of paying deferred compensation under an executive retirement plan. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: IRS stated that they would review and consider developing further specific instructions within the Internal Revenue Manual, the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Audit Techniques Guide or other IRS training material to aid examiners. We believe that implementing this recommendation will help ensure that IRS is aware of when companies with at-risk single-employer defined benefit plans are reporting assets set aside to pay deferred compensation to key executives while in a restricted period as income for those employees

Recommendation: The Secretary of Labor should review and determine whether its reporting requirements for executive retirement plans should be modified to provide additional information DOL could use to oversee whether these plans are meeting eligibility requirements. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Labor: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open

Comments: DOL stated that it does not have plans to issue guidance or regulations regarding executive retirement plans, citing, among other considerations, existing resource constraints and priority regulatory and guidance projects in development, and that it would not be advisable to shift resources from other projects. GAO continues to maintain that DOL's one-time single page alternative reporting for executive retirement plans lacks important information sufficient to help the agency identify whether companies may be including ineligible employees in its plan and DOL's current data on executive retirement plans has limited usefulness due to the age and limits of the original data submitted.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Labor should explore actions the agency could take to help companies prevent the inclusion of rank-and-file employees in executive retirement plans and determine which, if any, actions should be implemented. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of Labor: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open

Comments: DOL stated that the agency has not encountered evidence of systematic abuses involving executive retirement plans or that ERISA's claims procedure rules and judicial remedies are inadequate to protect participants' benefit rights. However, we reported that industry surveys indicate that some companies may be extending employee eligibility to high percentages of their workforce who are lower-paid and lower-ranked employees who may not be considered a part of a select group. Industry experts also told us that plan eligibility requirements for executive retirement plans are not clearly defined and that companies are unclear on how to establish eligibility, and they identified court cases that contribute to the confusion regarding plan eligibility. Implementing this recommendation will help ensure that only executives who can bear the risks inherent in these plans are participating.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Labor should provide specific instructions for companies to follow to correct eligibility errors that occur when rank-and-file employees are found to be participating in executive retirement plans, and should coordinate with other federal agencies on these instructions, as appropriate. (Recommendation 4)

Agency: Department of Labor: Office of the Secretary
Status: Open

Comments: DOL suggested a remedy in an amicus brief for companies to follow to correct eligibility errors in these plans could have unintended consequences for participants because, according to IRS officials, it could result in violations of federal tax law and additional tax for participants. We urge DOL to develop instructions to correct eligibility errors, in coordination with other federal agencies, as needed, in a way that does not adversely affect rank-and-file employees participating in these plans.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should assess options for updating Publications 590-A and 590-B to either include more information or direct taxpayers to other resources for IRA owners with investments in unconventional assets. Such information could include: storage requirements for IRA investments in certain precious metals; valuation methods for hard-to-value IRA assets; the Department of Labor's process for granting exemptions to IRA prohibited transactions rules; and IRA investments with the potential to create unrelated business income tax liabilities. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, building on forthcoming compliance research using new IRA asset data, should evaluate the feasibility of requiring disclosure for high-risk IRA asset types associated with abusive schemes as transactions of interest. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should develop resources (such as training materials or job aids) for Small Business/Self-Employed examiners conducting IRA owner audits that explain how IRAs with unconventional assets can generate unrelated business income tax liability, and how examiners can refer cases to unrelated business income experts in IRS for assistance. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Labor should document internal policies and procedures for managing the IRA prohibited transaction exemption process. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Labor
Status: Open

Comments: DOL agreed with this recommendation and plans to create an internal procedure manual which will document the Office of Exemption Determinations' process for managing IRA prohibited transaction exemption applications. When we confirm what actions DOL has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Labor, in consultation with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, should establish a formal means, such as a memorandum of understanding or other mechanism, to support and guide DOL's and IRS's collaborative efforts to oversee IRA prohibited transaction exemptions. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Labor
Status: Open

Comments: DOL agreed with this recommendation and plans to periodically discuss all IRA exemption cases with IRS and did not elaborate on the formal means for this information sharing. IRS said that it has met with DOL to formalize collaboration on exemptions from prohibited transaction treatment in IRAs. DOL agreed to contact IRS within 25 days of DOL receiving an IRA prohibited transaction exemption application to determine if there are any Internal Revenue Code issues. To avoid any disclosure concerns, DOL will not identify the applicant at that time. This new process will be reflected in DOL's forthcoming internal procedure manual for the prohibited transaction exemption process.

Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor, should establish a formal means, such as a memorandum of understanding or other mechanism, to support and guide DOL's and IRS's collaborative efforts to oversee IRA prohibited transaction exemptions. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: IRS agreed with this recommendation and said it has met with DOL to formalize collaboration on exemptions from prohibited transaction treatment in IRAs. DOL agreed to contact IRS within 25 days of DOL receiving an IRA prohibited transaction exemption application to determine if there are any Internal Revenue Code issues. To avoid any disclosure concerns, DOL will not identify the applicant at that time. This new process will be reflected in DOL's forthcoming internal procedure manual for the prohibited transaction exemption process.

Recommendation: To better identify the incidence and amount of loan offsets in 401(k) plans nationwide, we recommend that the Secretary of Labor direct the Assistant Secretary for the Employee Benefits Security Administration, in coordination with IRS, to revise the Form 5500 to require plan sponsors to report qualified plan loan offsets as a separate line item distinct from other types of distributions. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Labor
Status: Open

Comments: DOL neither agreed nor disagreed with this recommendation. The agency said it would consider the recommendation as part of its overall evaluation of the Form 5500. IRS said it would work with DOL as it responds to this recommendation.

Recommendation: The IRS Commissioner should work with the Department of the Treasury to consider clarifying if transfers of unclaimed savings from employer-based plans (such as 401(k) plans) to states are distributions, what, if any, tax reporting and withholding requirements apply, and when they apply. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: IRS agreed with this recommendation and stated that it would work with Treasury to consider clarifying the issues raised by this recommendation.

Recommendation: The IRS Commissioner should work with the Department of the Treasury to consider adding retirement savings transferred to states from terminating DC plans to the list of permitted reasons for rolling over savings after the 60-day rollover period, in a form consistent with the rules adopted on the taxation of transfers of unclaimed retirement savings. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: IRS agreed with this recommendation and stated that it would work with Treasury to consider addressing the issues outlined in this recommendation.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Labor should specify the circumstances, if any, under which uncashed distribution checks from active plans can be transferred to the states. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of Labor
Status: Open

Comments: DOL neither agreed nor disagreed with this recommendation. However, DOL stated it plans to continue to evaluate whether there are circumstances in which the transfer of uncashed distribution checks from an ongoing plan to the states advances the goal of reuniting missing participants with their savings, which is consistent with this recommendation. We commend DOL for recognizing the importance of this issue and will monitor the agency's efforts to address this recommendation.

Recommendation: The Assistant Secretary of Labor for the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) should clarify whether an Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 plan may incorporate material ESG factors into the investment management for a qualified default investment alternative (QDIA). (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Labor
Status: Open

Comments: DOL neither agreed nor disagreed with this recommendation. On April 23, 2018, while DOL was reviewing our report, the agency issued Field Assistance Bulletin 2018-01 regarding retirement plans' use of ESG factors. While this new bulletin specifically mentions the use of ESG factors in a QDIA and reiterates the conditions under which an investment option may generally be considered a QDIA, it focuses on the use of ESG factors for collateral benefits rather than on cases where ESG factors are considered in investment decisions because they have been determined by fiduciaries to be material to financial performance. For example, the new field assistance bulletin states that the QDIA regulations do not suggest that fiduciaries should select a QDIA based on collateral public policy goals. ESG factors can be used to address material risks, which might otherwise be ignored, and there is interest in considering such factors within a QDIA. The use of ESG factors in this manner can be distinct from pursuing collateral public policy goals. Additional clarification from DOL that explicitly addresses plans' use of financially material ESG factors in investment options designated as a QDIA could enhance the agency's effectiveness in assisting plan fiduciaries with understanding and fulfilling their obligations under ERISA. In June 2019, DOL stated that it would be appropriate to engage with stakeholders before reaching any conclusions about the necessity or appropriateness of issuing further guidance in this area. Additional information about DOL's efforts to engage with stakeholders, including the outcome of such efforts and rationale for any conclusions reached would help determine the effectiveness of the agency's actions.

Recommendation: The Assistant Secretary of Labor for EBSA should provide further information to assist fiduciaries in investment management involving ESG factors, including how to evaluate available options, such as questions to ask or items to consider. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of Labor
Status: Open

Comments: DOL neither agreed nor disagreed with this recommendation. GAO believes that while DOL's new field assistance bulletin provides information on the limitations of using ESG factors for pursuing collateral benefits, additional clarifying information could help sponsors conduct due diligence in considering whether ESG factors are material to an investment's financial performance and, if so, how to address those material risks. DOL's written comments recognize that additional clarification could be appropriate, depending on responses to the new field assistance bulletin from the public. We appreciate the consideration of the need for additional information, particularly as some have noted the new field assistance bulletin could create a chilling effect that leads fiduciaries to avoid considering ESG factors that could address material risks in their investments, to the detriment of plan participants' best interests. In June 2019, DOL stated that it would be appropriate to engage with stakeholders before reaching any conclusions about the necessity or appropriateness of issuing further guidance in this area. DOL further stated that the agency added a new project to the Spring 2019 regulatory agenda related to proxy voting. Additional information about DOL's new project on proxy voting and efforts to engage with stakeholders, including the outcome of such efforts and rationale for any conclusions reached, would help determine the effectiveness of the agency's actions.

Recommendation: Congress should consider legislation modifying the Internal Revenue Code to allow routine account transfers within the same foreign workplace retirement plan or between two foreign workplace retirement plans in the same country to be free from U.S. tax in countries covered by an existing income tax treaty that provides for favorable U.S. tax treatment of foreign workplace retirement plan contributions.

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: We will monitor congressional action related to this matter.

Recommendation: The Secretary of Labor should issue guidance on the obligations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 of sponsors of ongoing plans to prevent, search for, and pay costs associated with locating missing participants. (Recommendation 1)

Agency: Department of Labor
Status: Open

Comments: Labor agreed with this recommendation. In June 2019, the Department reported that it engaged with a range of stakeholders on issues surrounding missing and unresponsive participants, including representatives of plans, employers, financial services groups, consumer groups, and state unclaimed property funds. Their goal is to help plans locate and pay retirement benefits to missing participants and beneficiaries; they will evaluate constructive guidance to issue. There is no specific timeline for next steps regarding subregulatory guidance or regulatory proposals. GAO will monitor the agency's progress in implementing this recommendation.

Recommendation: The IRS Commissioner should review taxation issues relating to distributions involving incorrect participant addresses and uncashed benefit checks and clarify for the public the Internal Revenue Code's requirements in these circumstances. (Recommendation 2)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: IRS agreed to review taxation issues relating to distributions involving incorrect participant addresses and uncashed benefit checks and to clarify for the public the Internal Revenue Code's requirements in these circumstances. We will consider closing this recommendation when the agency provides evidence that it completed these efforts.

Recommendation: The IRS Commissioner should consider revising the letter forwarding program in a cost-effective manner to again provide information on behalf of plan sponsors on unclaimed retirement accounts to participants. (Recommendation 3)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: IRS disagreed with this recommendation, noting that the IRS address of record for a participant would likely be of no greater value than addresses available through alternatives such as commercial locator services. However, our report does not cite the accuracy of IRS addresses, but rather other benefits that make a program revision worth considering, specifically the likelihood that individuals will open IRS correspondence, and the trust DOL places in the service as way for plan fiduciaries to meet their obligations. IRS also stated that the limited number of IRS staff and resources impact the feasibility of reinstating this program for plan participants. We continue to believe that expanding the letter forwarding program would be beneficial, and we encourage IRS to consider cost-effective ways to do so.

Recommendation: The IRS Commissioner should clarify how U.S. individuals are to report their foreign retirement accounts. The clarification could include addressing how these accounts should be designated and how the taxpayer should report contributions, earnings, and distributions made from the account. (Recommendation 4)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: IRS agreed with this recommendation. We encourage IRS to take the necessary steps to dispel any confusion U.S. individuals may have over how to properly classify and report their foreign retirement accounts on a U.S. tax return-such clarification should help ensure that these taxpayers can meet their tax reporting obligations.

Recommendation: The IRS Commissioner should systematically analyze data reported through Form 8938 filings on foreign retirement accounts owned by U.S. individuals with the goal of developing an evidence-based understanding of how these accounts change over time and what level of risk these accounts pose for tax evasion. To assist with this analysis, IRS should consider revising Form 8938 to more clearly distinguish between retirement accounts and other types of accounts or assets being reported by taxpayers under current reporting requirements. (Recommendation 5)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: IRS disagreed with this recommendation but not on its merits, citing a lack of resources to implement it. Specifically, IRS noted that although the modification to the Form 8938 suggested in this recommendation may seem minor, systemically collecting and analyzing the data would require resources beyond those currently available to IRS. However, our report notes that IRS indicated that they already collect foreign account filing data through the Form 8938 and that the current reporting requirements help the agency to "keep a line of sight" on U.S. individuals' foreign pension arrangements. IRS told us that without such data being reported, U.S. individuals with foreign retirement accounts may seek to avoid proper reporting on their tax returns when distributions are made. However, without agreeing to take steps to analyze these data reported by taxpayers, the question remains why the agency continues to collect such information-which we show in the report to present a substantial reporting burden on taxpayers-if the agency has no plan to analyze the data in order to make an informed decision about the risk for tax evasion that such accounts present. It is also unclear how IRS would maintain a line of sight on foreign retirement accounts belonging to U.S. individuals without analyzing the data reported by taxpayers on such accounts. We recognize that resources are limited. When staff and resources become available, IRS should modify the form and conduct a systematic analysis of these data-data that current law requires taxpayers to report-in order to assess the risk of tax evasion that foreign retirement accounts pose. Such an analysis can provide a basis to reach an evidence-based understanding of how these accounts change over time and what level of risk they pose for tax evasion, and U.S. individuals owning foreign retirement accounts will continue to face these substantial reporting burdens without the knowledge that the data they are required to provide will be put to good use by the federal government.

Recommendation: The IRS Commissioner should take steps to improve the likelihood that the Notice of Potential Private Pension Benefit Information corresponds to actual retirement benefits in the future, for example, by working with the Social Security Administration as necessary. (Recommendation 6)

Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
Status: Open

Comments: IRS agreed with this recommendation. The agency indicated it would work to improve the likelihood that the Notice of Potential Private Pension Benefit Information corresponds to actual retirement benefits in the future, and agreed to take steps to ensure that the data reported on Form 8955-SSA are accurate and to advise plan sponsors of any changes to reporting these data.

Recommendation: The Social Security Administration Commissioner should take steps to improve the likelihood that the Notice of Potential Private Pension Benefit Information corresponds to actual retirement benefits in the future, for example, by working with IRS as necessary. (Recommendation 7)

Agency: Social Security Administration
Status: Open

Comments: SSA agreed with this recommendation. In November 2019, SSA stated that the agency is meeting with the IRS regularly to discuss Form 8955-SSA, which provides the basis for the information shown in the "Potential Private Retirement Benefit Information" notice. The IRS agreed to incorporate SSA's suggestion to update Form 8955-SSA to explain that the filer should include the individual pension plan participant's full social security number (SSN) on the form. SSA reported that it is working with the IRS to clarify coding instructions for Form 8955-SSA and institute a new edit to its paper processing to ensure accuracy. They are also considering potential data exchanges with filers. We will monitor the agency's progress in completing these tasks.

Recommendation: Congress should consider establishing an independent commission to comprehensively examine the U.S. retirement system and make recommendations to clarify key policy goals for the system and improve how the nation can promote more stable retirement security. We suggest that such a commission include representatives from government agencies, employers, the financial services industry, unions, participant advocates, and researchers, among others, to help inform policymakers on changes needed to improve the current U.S. retirement system.

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: On April 25, 2018, the Senate introduced the "Commission on Retirement Security Act of 2018" (S.2753). On May 14, 2019, the Senate re-introduced this legislation (S.1435). This bipartisan legislation would establish a comprehensive retirement Commission that would be responsible for developing findings, conclusions, and recommendations for how to improve or replace existing private retirement programs. Commission members would be appointed using a bipartisan process and would include representatives from government agencies; current or former members of Congress; economic experts; and practitioners with expertise or experience engaging with employers, labor unions, and consumers designing and administering retirement plans. As of July 2020, no additional action has been taken.

Recommendation: To ensure that current vesting policies appropriately balance plans' needs and interests with the needs of workers to have employment mobility while also saving for retirement, Treasury should evaluate the appropriateness of existing maximum vesting policies for account-based plans, considering today's mobile labor force, and seek legislative action to revise vesting schedules, if deemed necessary. The Department of Labor could provide assistance with such an evaluation.

Agency: Department of the Treasury
Status: Open

Comments: As of August 2020, no action had been taken on this recommendation. Treasury did not report an evaluation of existing maximum vesting policies for account-based plans and reiterated its policy of not recommending any legislative change to Congress. Other priorities have delayed the agency's plan to work with IRS on guidance to update the regulations under Code section 411, which concern vesting schedules, as currently in effect. But those updates, even if they should occur in the future, cannot modify permitted vesting schedules because, as Treasury notes in its comments, the vesting rules were determined by Congress. Given that more than 84 million people hold 401(k) plan accounts and that median current tenure in the private-sector is about four years, the potential for these policies to significantly impact Americans' retirement security remains. We will close this recommendation when Treasury evaluates the appropriateness of current maximum vesting policies to help determine whether they unduly reduce the retirement savings of workers, regardless of whether the agency opts to seek legislative action.

Recommendation: To help participants better understand eligibility and vesting policies, the Department of Labor (DOL) should develop guidance for plan sponsors that identifies best practices for communicating information about eligibility and vesting policies in a clear manner in summary plan descriptions. For example, DOL could discourage plans from including in documents information about employer contributions or other provisions that are not actually being used by the plan sponsor.

Agency: Department of Labor
Status: Open

Comments: As of June 2020, the Department of Labor (DOL) was considering delaying regulatory action to improve disclosures, to direct its regulatory resources elsewhere. The agency noted however, that it may reopen for further comment a Request for Information posted in 2019, which sought public input on actions that could make retirement plan disclosures more understandable and useful for participants and beneficiaries, among other things. Such actions may include revising standards for the summary plan description, which our report found can contain obsolete and confusing information concerning eligibility and vesting. We continue to encourage the agency to include eligibility and vesting among topics considered for clarification in its future regulatory work and, in the meantime, to consider using sub-regulatory guidance to help plan sponsors better communicate these critical policies.

Recommendation: Congress should consider whether ERISA's provisions related to the timing of employer matching contributions need to be adjusted to reflect today's mobile workforce and workplace plans, which are predominantly 401(k) plans offering matching employer contributions.

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: As of February 2020, Congress has not taken action on this matter.

Recommendation: Congress should consider whether ERISA's provisions related to last day policies need to be adjusted to reflect today's mobile workforce and workplace plans, which are predominantly 401(k) plans offering matching employer contributions.

Agency: Congress
Status: Open

Comments: As of March 2020, Congress did not take action on this matter.