Reports & Testimonies
Recommendations Database
GAO’s recommendations database contains report recommendations that still need to be addressed. GAO’s priority recommendations are those that we believe warrant priority attention. We sent letters to the heads of key departments and agencies, urging them to continue focusing on these issues. Below you can search only priority recommendations, or search all recommendations.
Our recommendations help congressional and agency leaders prepare for appropriations and oversight activities, as well as help improve government operations. Moreover, when implemented, some of our priority recommendations can save large amounts of money, help Congress make decisions on major issues, and substantially improve or transform major government programs or agencies, among other benefits.
As of October 25, 2020, there are 4812 open recommendations, of which 473 are priority recommendations. Recommendations remain open until they are designated as Closed-implemented or Closed-not implemented.
Browse or Search Open Recommendations
Have a Question about a Recommendation?
- For questions about a specific recommendation, contact the person or office listed with the recommendation.
- For general information about recommendations, contact GAO's Audit Policy and Quality Assurance office at (202) 512-6100 or apqa@gao.gov.
Results:
Subject Term: "Military treatment facilities"
GAO-20-371, May 29, 2020
Phone: (202) 512-3604
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD partially concurred with this recommendation. In its response, the department described its planned implementation steps, such as publishing measures it may use for assessing available civilian health care. We will continue to monitor the status of the measures and any other actions the department takes to address the recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD partially concurred with this recommendation. The department noted actions underway and planned to implement it, including a centralized appointment booking system and monitoring access to care as MTFs restructure. We will continue to monitor the status of this effort and any other actions the department takes to address the recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD partially concurred with this recommendation, and described planned steps to implement it for future MTF restructuring decisions. We will continue to monitor actions the department takes to address the recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD partially concurred with this recommendation. We will continue to monitor actions the department takes to address the recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation and described actions underway and planned to implement it. We will continue to monitor actions the department takes to address the recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation and described actions underway and planned to implement it. We will continue to monitor actions the department takes to address the recommendation.
GAO-19-488, Jun 12, 2019
Phone: (202) 512-7114
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
GAO-19-53, Oct 30, 2018
Phone: (202) 512-3604
including 3 priority recommendations
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Priority recommendation
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. According to responses provided by DOD officials in December 2019, the department provided guidance on the division of the 16 operational readiness and installation-specific medical functions in a March 2019 memorandum from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. However, further detail is needed regarding what analysis DOD completed to assess the 16 functions for duplication.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Priority recommendation
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. In December 2019, DOD officials stated that DOD conducted a review of the DHA personnel requirements and that the military departments also conducted reviews. DOD officials also stated that DOD will continue to evaluate the mix of contractors, military, and civilian employees during and after the transition. However, the review of DHA personnel requirements DOD officials referenced in their December 2019 responses, as GAO previously reported in GAO-19-53, did not validate personnel requirements. Further information is needed regarding what steps DOD is taking to validate headquarters-level personnel requirements.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Priority recommendation
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. In December 2019, DOD officials stated that through the review of the budget development process, DOD transferred 1,900 personnel to the military departments for the management of their respective readiness missions. Further, DOD officials mentioned a 2018 report concerning a review of DHA personnel requirements. As reported in GAO-19-53, the report on DHA personnel requirements was specific to DHA and did not include information regarding the military departments' headquarters and intermediate commands. Further information is needed to determine whether DOD's efforts included a comprehensive review that considers the least costly mix--per DOD guidance--of military, civilian, and contractor personnel.
GAO-17-114, Jan 30, 2017
Phone: (202) 512-3604
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD non-concurred with this recommendation. However, the FY 2019 National Defense Authorization Act mandated that DOD implement this recommendation. As of August 2019, DOD had modified the Health Related Behaviors Survey (HRBS) to include questions on gambling and DOD and the Services are in the process of updating the electronic Periodic Health Assessment (PHA) assessment forms to capture the gambling screening data required by the legislation. Once the PHA is updated to include the gambling screening data, we will be able to close this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of August 2019, DOD stated that this guidance is still in internal DOD coordination. Moreover, guidance related to gambling disorder screening, referral, and treatment needs to be coordinated with the Addictive Substance Misuse Advisory Committee (ASMAC) before issuance, which is anticipated to be July 2020.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of August 2019, the Army did not have any updates to provide on the status of this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of August 2019, Navy officials stated that the draft Navy instruction was returned back to the Navy's Drug Detection and Deterrence Program Office to add language regarding the Secretary of the Navy's ban on hemp/CBD products that was announced this month. The Navy has added the language and pushed the instruction out to the main stakeholders for coordination. It is due back to the Director, Navy Staff no later than 30 August 2019 where it will go back into the queue for signature. Navy officials anticipate signature sometime later this fall.
Agency: Department of Homeland Security: United States Coast Guard
Status: Open
Comments: The U.S. Coast Guard/DHS concurred with this recommendation. As of August 2019, the Coast Guard stated that updates to this manual are ongoing. According to Coast Guard officials, including gambling disorder in this manual is one of many significant updates the program is adjudicating for this manual and it's a lengthy clearance process. No timeline was provided for expected issuance.
GAO-12-31, Dec 15, 2011
Phone: (202)512-3000
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information. As of September 2019, DOD has not provided information or documentation to address this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information. As of September 2019, DOD has not provided information or documentation to address this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information. As of September 2019, DOD has not provided information or documentation to address this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information. As of September 2019, DOD has not provided information or documentation to address this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information. As of September 2019, DOD has not provided information or documentation to address this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information. As of September 2019, DOD has not provided information or documentation to address this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information. As of September 2019, DOD has not provided information or documentation to address this recommendation.
Agency: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information. As of September 2019, DOD has not provided information or documentation to address this recommendation.