Skip to main content

Afghanistan Governance: Performance-Data Gaps Hinder Overall Assessment of U.S. Efforts to Build Financial Management Capacity

GAO-11-907 Published: Sep 20, 2011. Publicly Released: Sep 20, 2011.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

The United States has allocated over $72 billion to Afghanistan since 2002. With other international donors, it is focused on transitioning leadership to the Afghan government and has pledged to provide at least 50 percent of its development aid through the Afghan government budget. Improving Afghanistan's public financial management capacity is critical to this transition. In 2010, the Afghan government, consulting with donors, issued a Public Financial Management Roadmap (Roadmap), which outlines goals to improve Afghanistan's capacity to develop a national budget and expend funds. GAO reviewed (1) U.S. efforts to improve the Afghan government's public financial management capacity, including the extent to which they support Roadmap goals, and (2) the extent to which U.S. efforts have improved the government's capacity. GAO reviewed documents and interviewed officials from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID); Departments of State, Defense (DOD), and the Treasury (Treasury); World Bank; and Afghan government in Washington, D.C., and Kabul, Afghanistan.

USAID, Treasury, and DOD support the Public Financial Management Roadmap (Roadmap) goals through various activities such as (1) USAID projects that provide technical assistance and training to Afghan civil servants, (2) Treasury advisers' assistance to the Ministry of Finance (MOF), and (3) DOD's Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan (CSTC-A) that provides support to the Ministries of Defense (MOD) and Interior (MOI). GAO found that these efforts are aligned with the Roadmap goals. USAID provides training and technical assistance mainly through two contractor-implemented projects. One USAID project provides technical assistance to 37 civilian ministries to develop their annual budgets, while another USAID project provides training in areas such as financial management and procurement to Afghan civil servants. Treasury provides technical assistance through 6 advisers in MOF, who work with senior officials on issues such as budget execution. Through CSTC-A, DOD has 22 advisers at MOD and MOI, who advise officials on developing their budgets and strengthening the payroll system to improve accuracy. The overall extent to which U.S. efforts have improved the public financial management capacity of the Afghan government cannot be fully determined because (1) U.S. agencies have reported mixed results, and (2) weaknesses in USAID's performance management frameworks, such as lack of performance targets and data, prevent reliable assessments of its results. USAID's evaluations of its two public financial management projects indicate that some activities were successfully completed, while others were terminated because these activities were not deemed useful. Treasury advisers assessed that although their assistance at MOF had a positive effect, some results had limitations. For example, advisers assessed that their efforts to design reports for improved communication of financial information were not as successful as they had expected. Additionally, CSTC-A assessed that while MOD has made progress since 2008 and can perform critical financial management functions with minimal international support, MOI still needs significant international support for such operations. In early 2010, CSTC-A projected that MOD would transition to needing no coalition support for finance and budget functions by January 2012, and MOI would reach a similar goal by March 2012. However, in early 2011, CSTC-A extended time frames for meeting its benchmarks for MOD and MOI to March 2012 and November 2012, respectively. Regarding deficiencies in USAID's performance management framework, both the USAID Mission performance management plan and project-specific plans lack performance targets as required for each indicator related to public financial management. Additionally, implementing partners, such as contractors, have not consistently reported performance data for all indicators. Moreover, baselines for public financial management capacity of civilian ministries have not yet been established. In the absence of baselines, performance targets, and data, it is difficult to assess the extent to which USAID efforts have increased the public financial management capacity of Afghan ministries. GAO recommends that the USAID Administrator take steps to (1) establish performance targets in its Mission Performance Management Plan (PMP); (2) ensure implementing partners' PMPs include baselines and approved targets; and (3) ensure implementing partners routinely report performance data. USAID concurred with GAO recommendations and is taking steps to address them.

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Sort descending Recommendation Status
U.S. Agency for International Development For public financial management (PFM) efforts, the USAID Administrator should establish targets, as required, for each PFM-related performance indicator in its Mission Performance Management Plan for Afghanistan.
Closed – Implemented
USAID agreed with our recommendation. However, according to USAID officials, they faced delays in establishing indicators and targets for mission-wide performance plan because (a) the mission decided to develop a new 10-year strategy, which invalidated the Performance Management Plan developed for 2011-2015, and (b) they had to wait until April 2015 for Afghan government ministers to be confirmed, following presidential elections in Afghanistan in 2014, to ensure alignment between mission strategy and the new Afghan government's priorities. Finally, in response to GAO recommendation, USAID's mission in Afghanistan established targets for the following three public financial management-related indicators in its Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016 Performance Plan and Report: (i) number of public sector entities with improved public financial management systems as a result of U.S. government assistance, (ii) number of days of U.S. government funded technical assistance in financial sector capacity provided to counterparts or stakeholders, and (iii) number of days of U.S. government supported technical assistance in fiscal policy and fiscal administration provided to counterparts or stakeholders. USAID established annual targets for these indicators from Fiscal Years 2016 through 2018.
U.S. Agency for International Development For public financial management (PFM) efforts, the USAID Administrator should take steps to ensure that the USAID-approved performance management plan for each implementing partner includes baseline data and targets for each indicator.
Closed – Implemented
As a result of GAO's recommendation, USAID required the contractor for its existing public financial management capacity project, called Economic Growth and Governance Initiative, to include baseline and targets for each indicator in the updated performance management plan. USAID approved the completed plan, including baseline and targets for each indicator, in November 2011.
U.S. Agency for International Development For public financial management (PFM) efforts, the USAID Administrator should ensure that implementing partners report performance data at the frequency established in the performance management plan.
Closed – Implemented
USAID agreed with the recommendation. As a result of GAO recommendation, USAID required the contractor for its existing public financial management capacity project, called Economic Growth and Governance Initiative, to report performance data on a quarterly basis for fiscal year 2012. The implementing partner generally reported performance data on a quarterly basis for all indicators related to public financial management in fiscal year 2012.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Budget functionsBudget obligationsBudgetingCapacity managementCivil serviceData collectionData integrityFederal aid to foreign countriesFinancial managementForeign governmentsInternal controlsInternational cooperationInternational organizationsInternational relationsPerformance managementFinancial reportingPublic sector