Federal Research:
Information on the Advanced Technology Program's 1997 Award Selection
T-RCED-98-92: Published: Feb 26, 1998. Publicly Released: Feb 26, 1998.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
(202) 512-6082
contact@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
GAO discussed the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) Advanced Technology Program's (ATP) fiscal year (FY) 1997 award selection process, focusing on identifying the information that ATP used to determine whether to accept or reject competing project proposals.
GAO noted that: (1) according to program officials, for the FY 1997 competition, NIST made the determination of whether the applicant could probably find funding elsewhere based on information gathered throughout the proposal review process; (2) this included questioning the applicants during the oral review phase if doubt remained as to whether the applicants could have found project funding elsewhere; (3) for the FY 1997 competition, there was no requirement that applicants report that they could not find funding elsewhere; (4) however, in December 1997, ATP revised its requirements such that in the future applicants must indicate on the proposal application their efforts to find private funding; (5) likewise, program officials told GAO that information acquired during the proposal review was used to determine if program support was important to the project from a national economic perspective; (6) specifically, according to ATP officials, one of the five selection criteria for evaluating program proposals, "Potential Net Broad-based Economic Benefits," relates to whether or not funding a project would create a serious national economic concern; (7) according to the guidance to applicants for preparing project proposals, the review process would include a review of the proposal by panels of outside experts in business and economics to determine the proposed project's potential for broad-based benefits and its commercial viability; and (8) however, program officials neither defined what they meant by a serious national economic concern nor how the ATP reviews resulted in a determination that a delay in project progress would not be a serious national economic concern.
Feb 18, 2021
-
Technology Assessment Design HandbookGAO-21-347G: Published: Feb 18, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 18, 2021.
Feb 3, 2021
-
Federal Research Grants:
OMB Should Take Steps to Establish the Research Policy BoardGAO-21-232R: Published: Feb 3, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 3, 2021.
Feb 1, 2021
-
Department of Energy:
Improved Performance Planning Could Strengthen Technology TransferGAO-21-202: Published: Feb 1, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 1, 2021.
Jan 29, 2021
-
Small Business Innovation Research:
Three Agencies Made Awards to Businesses Majority-Owned by Investment Companies and FundsGAO-21-223R: Published: Jan 29, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 29, 2021.
Dec 21, 2020
-
Science & Tech Spotlight:
Tracing the Source of Chemical WeaponsGAO-21-271SP: Published: Dec 21, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 21, 2020.
Dec 17, 2020
-
Federal Research:
Agencies Need to Enhance Policies to Address Foreign InfluenceGAO-21-130: Published: Dec 17, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 17, 2020.
Dec 7, 2020
-
Science & Tech Spotlight:
Air Quality SensorsGAO-21-189SP: Published: Dec 7, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 7, 2020.
Nov 30, 2020
-
Artificial Intelligence in Health Care:
Benefits and Challenges of Technologies to Augment Patient CareGAO-21-7SP: Published: Nov 30, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 30, 2020.
Nov 20, 2020
-
Biomedical Research:
NIH Should Publicly Report More Information about the Licensing of Its Intellectual PropertyGAO-21-52: Published: Oct 22, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 20, 2020.
Sep 3, 2020
-
Defense Science and Technology:
Opportunities to Better Integrate Industry Independent Research and Development into DOD PlanningGAO-20-578: Published: Sep 3, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 3, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here