Airline Competition:

Passenger Facility Charges Can Provide an Independent Source of Funding for Airport Expansion and Improvement Projects

T-RCED-90-99: Published: Jun 19, 1990. Publicly Released: Jun 19, 1990.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

GAO discussed whether airports needed to have the option of assessing a direct charge on passengers in order to expand and promote a more competitive environment. GAO noted that: (1) passenger facility charges (PFC) could help airports fund needed projects and make room for potential competitors to begin service; (2) airports are often unable to add needed capacity because of agreements that give incumbent airlines significant control over airport expansion decisions; (3) 25 of the 30 largest airports had restrictions in their agreements with airlines that limited the airports' ability to make use of PFC; (4) many airports relied heavily on airlines to fund capital projects for capacity expansion and improvement; (5) PFC could provide a source of revenue independent of airline approval for financing airport expansion projects needed to meet expected growth; (6) previous GAO studies indicated that airline fares were substantially higher when one or two airlines controlled most of the traffic and when there were barriers to new entry; (7) common leasing practices could limit future competitive access to PFC-funded facilities by extending the length of time airlines control exclusively leased facilities; (8) PFC could help close the gap between federal funding and airport needs for funding capital projects; and (9) diversion of PFC funds to nonairport uses could be prevented if safeguards were enacted as part of proposed PFC legislation.

Sep 8, 2020

Aug 20, 2020

Aug 18, 2020

Aug 10, 2020

Jul 27, 2020

Jul 16, 2020

Jun 23, 2020

Apr 30, 2020

Apr 29, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here