Private Banking:

Raul Salinas, Citibank, and Alleged Money Laundering

T-OSI-00-3: Published: Nov 9, 1999. Publicly Released: Nov 9, 1999.

Additional Materials:


Robert H. Hast
(202) 512-3000


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed its 1998 investigation of alleged illegalities involving Raul Salinas de Gotari, brother of the former President of Mexico, Carlos Salinas de Gotari, and a U.S. bank, Citibank.

GAO noted that: (1) Mr. Salinas was able to transfer $90 million to $100 million between 1992 and 1994 by using a private banking relationship formed by Citibank New York in 1992; (2) the funds were transferred through Citibank Mexico and Citibank New York to private banking investment accounts in Citibank London and Citibank Switzerland; (3) beginning in mid-1992, Citibank actions assisted Mr. Salinas with these transfers and effectively disguised the funds' source and destination, thus breaking the funds' paper trail; (4) Citibank: (a) set up an offshore private investment company named Trocca, to hold Mr. Salinas' assets, through Cititrust (Cayman) and investment accounts in Citibank London and Citibank Switzerland; (b) waived bank references for Mr. Salinas and did not prepare a financial profile on him or request a waiver for the profile, as required by then Citibank know your customer policy; (c) facilitated Mrs. Patricia Paulina Salinas' use of another name to initiate fund transfers in Mexico; and (d) had funds wired from Citibank Mexico to a Citibank New York concentration account--a business account that commingles funds from various sources--before forwarding them to Trocca's offshore Citibank investment accounts; (5) no U.S. documentation identified Mr. Salinas as Trocca's beneficial owner or connected Mr. Salinas to the Trocca funds transferred through Citibank Mexico and Citibank New York; (6) according to Citibank New York's Vice President for Legal Affairs, Citibank's actions violated only one aspect of the then Citibank know your customer policy; (7) Citibank should have prepared a financial profile or waived the requirement before accepting Mr. Salinas as a customer; (8) by investigating his financial background, Citibank could have verified the source of Mr. Salinas' wealth and transferred funds; (9) limited by the ongoing Department of Justice investigation, GAO could not determine whether Citibank's actions violated law or regulation; (10) the Federal Reserve also did not comment on whether Citibank's actions were violations because information available to it at the time GAO inquired was insufficient for it to make a determination; (11) however, the Office of the Comptroller of Currency stated that the actions did not violate civil aspects of the Bank Secrecy Act; (12) private banking's know your customer policies were then voluntary and not governed by law or regulation; and (13) a comparison of Citibank actions and Citibank testimony in the 1994 money laundering trial shows that the two were inconsistent concerning due diligence and know your customer practices in private banking.

Jan 28, 2021

Dec 16, 2020

Dec 10, 2020

Sep 22, 2020

Sep 4, 2020

Jul 21, 2020

Jul 6, 2020

Apr 30, 2020

  • finance icon, source: Comstock

    Priority Open Recommendations:

    Department of the Treasury
    GAO-20-549PR: Published: Apr 23, 2020. Publicly Released: Apr 30, 2020.

Apr 27, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here