Chemical Weapons:

Issues Involving Destruction Technologies

T-NSIAD-94-159: Published: Apr 26, 1994. Publicly Released: Apr 26, 1994.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

GAO discussed: (1) alternative technologies for destroying chemical weapons; (2) the operational safety of the Army's chemical weapons incineration facility; and (3) the cryofracture process for destroying chemical munitions. GAO noted that: (1) the alternative technologies it reviewed would require at least 13 years to reach maturity; (2) a concurrent development approach to some of the technologies would reduce the time to maturity but would involve much greater cost and performance risks; (3) cost estimates for alternative technologies are not reliable because the technologies are in the initial stages of research and development; (4) none of the alternative technologies would be as thorough as baseline incineration, the technology the Army presently uses; (5) the Army's Johnston Atoll facility meets the Environmental Protection Agency's safety standards; (6) in March 1994, the Johnston Atoll facility accidentally released 12 milligrams of a nerve agent, but there were no injuries and the incident is still under investigation; and (7) while the Army is testing cryofracture, it would be significantly more expensive than baseline incineration, and the Army has not proved its efficacy.

Jan 19, 2021

Jan 14, 2021

Jan 12, 2021

Dec 10, 2020

Dec 2, 2020

Nov 20, 2020

Nov 19, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here