Navy Competition Advocate General and ADP Vendor Complaint Handling

T-NSIAD-90-9: Published: Nov 15, 1989. Publicly Released: Nov 15, 1989.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

GAO discussed the Navy's automated data processing procurement practices, focusing on the: (1) Competition Advocate General's process for handling complaints; and (2) ADP Acquisition Assessment Panel's efforts to improve competitiveness in ADP procurement. GAO found that: (1) the Advocate Office had no written complaint-handling procedures, did not have a comprehensive recordkeeping system for complaints, and did not monitor other activities' actions in handling referred complaints; (2) the Panel reviewed 22 planned ADP procurements and 23 procurement awards to identify restrictions to competition and used the results to enhance competition in future ADP procurements; (3) the Panel revised ADP procurement procedures to require development of acquisition plans or competition papers for commercial ADP equipment procurements, Advocate General review of the plans, independent reviews of technical specifications, and increased communication with ADP industry representatives; (4) the Advocate Office had a limited role in complaint resolution, with the exception of a complaint concerning the Office of Naval Research's (ONR) lack of competitiveness in its ADP procurements, in which it found that between 1986 and 1989, ONR awarded 29 of 30 contracts to 1 vendor; and (5) the Advocate Office also found that ONR did not perform advance procurement planning to achieve full competition and ensure that the procurements met its needs in the most effective, economical, and timely manner and often purchased its ADP equipment piecemeal.

Mar 14, 2018

Jan 30, 2018

Jan 10, 2018

Nov 21, 2017

Nov 15, 2017

Nov 7, 2017

Oct 4, 2017

Sep 18, 2017

Sep 6, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here