Defense Acquisitions:

Decisions on the Joint Strike Fighter Will Be Critical for Acquisition Reform

T-NSIAD-00-173: Published: May 10, 2000. Publicly Released: May 10, 2000.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Louis J. Rodrigues
(202) 512-3000
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed Department of Defense (DOD) Joint Strike Fighter acquisition program, focusing on the: (1) best commercial practices for developing new products; (2) reasons why DOD does not follow these practices; and (3) opportunity that Joint Strike Fighter represents to strengthen--or weaken--the effect of best practices and acquisition reform on major weapons.

GAO noted that: (1) leading commercial firms have adopted a knowledge-based approach to developing new products, underwritten by incentives that encourage realism, candor, and meeting product expectations; (2) making sure that new technology is mature--that is, demonstrating that it works--before a product development starts is the foundation for this approach; (3) leading commercial firms discipline the product development phase by adhering to: (a) time limits for completing development; and (b) high standards for demonstrating design and production knowledge; (4) these practices have put commercial managers in an excellent position to succeed in developing better products in less time and producing them within estimated costs; (5) DOD programs, with some exceptions, proceed with lower levels of knowledge about key factors of product development and allow technology development to take place during product development; (6) DOD's variances from best practices stem from strong incentives for starting programs too early, overpromising performance capabilities, and understating expected costs, schedules, and technical risks; (7) while these incentives evolved over time to help build support for programs, they put program managers in a very difficult position to deliver better weapons on time and within budget; (8) DOD accepts the need to get better outcomes from its weapon system programs and accepts best commercial practices as a way to get those outcomes; (9) in fact, it is incorporating such practices in a major revision of its acquisition policy; (10) DOD has designated the Joint Strike Fighter as a flagship program for acquisition reform; (11) by best practices standards, none of the fighter's critical technology areas identified by the program office are expected to be at readiness levels considered an acceptable risk for entry into engineering and manufacturing development; (12) delaying this phase of the program until these technologies are mature would improve the chances that the Joint Strike Fighter will be fielded as planned; (13) however, despite not having the requisite knowledge for the eight technologies, DOD has deemed the risks manageable and proposes to proceed with the program as planned; (14) such a decision reinforces traditional incentives and increases the likelihood for future cost, schedule, and performance problems; and (15) DOD's plans to move the Joint Strike Fighter into engineering and manufacturing development with immature technology illustrates a lack of commitment to following best commercial practices as part of its acquisition reform efforts.

Oct 11, 2018

Oct 10, 2018

Oct 9, 2018

Sep 24, 2018

Sep 20, 2018

Sep 10, 2018

Sep 6, 2018

Sep 5, 2018

Sep 4, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here