Government Contractors:

Contracting Out Implications of Streamlining Agency Operations

T-GGD-95-4: Published: Oct 5, 1994. Publicly Released: Oct 5, 1994.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

GAO discussed the interrelationship between contracting out and streamlining agency operations through personnel reductions. GAO noted that: (1) contracting out could provide valuable, up-to-date expertise that agencies do not have in-house or do not need on a permanent basis; (2) agencies should consider the cost of contracting out versus the cost of having services performed in-house, the length and nature of the work, and the quality and timeliness of the services needed before deciding their course of action; (3) Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance does not require agencies to conduct cost comparisons before contracting out for advisory and assistance services; (4) nine studies on advisory and assistance services indicated potential cost savings if services are performed in-house under certain circumstances, but the studies' limitations reduced their applicability to the government as a whole; (5) although federal law prohibits agencies from contracting out services due to personnel reductions, OMB needs to clarify its guidance to require cost comparisons for advisory and assistance services; and (6) agencies need the flexibility to perform their work in the most cost-effective manner and should not be subject to arbitrary personnel ceilings if they determine that using federal employees to accomplish work is more advantageous than contracting out.

Feb 3, 2021

Jan 29, 2021

Jan 19, 2021

Jan 13, 2021

Dec 16, 2020

Dec 9, 2020

Dec 3, 2020

Nov 30, 2020

Nov 24, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here