Federal Judiciary Space:

Long-Range Planning Process Needs Revision

T-GGD-94-18: Published: Oct 7, 1993. Publicly Released: Oct 7, 1993.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

GAO discussed the judiciary's process for projecting its future space needs, focusing on: (1) whether projection methods were applied consistently across districts; and (2) the judiciary's current space needs. GAO noted that: (1) the judiciary's basic planning assumption is that caseloads should determine staff and space needs; (2) the judiciary's method for projecting space needs does not treat districts consistently (3) the judiciary does not revise district plans completed before it made changes to its space allocation method; (4) the judiciary has not used the same caseload projections for all districts, resulting in underestimations of space needs for some courts; (5) the judiciary has given equal weight to all cases and ignores differences in complexity and trial length; (6) two-thirds of the districts' current space needs have been overstated because some districts occupy more space or have more authorized staff than their actual caseloads warrant; (7) projection methods have not produced reliable results because of flawed statistics and subjective estimates of current caseloads; and (8) the judiciary's 10-year projections are probably overestimated by 3.6 million square feet and $1.1 billion dollars.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

Mar 8, 2018

Mar 7, 2018

Feb 28, 2018

Feb 27, 2018

Feb 23, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here