Water Resources:

Highfield Water Company Should Not Receive Compensation From the U.S. Army

RCED-93-49: Published: May 10, 1993. Publicly Released: May 10, 1993.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed a firm's claims for lost property and damages against the Department of the Army for improper and excessive groundwater pumping during periods of drought between 1974 and 1978.

GAO found that: (1) the firm did not support its claim against the Army's use of groundwater; (2) the Army's operations did not exceed the aquifer's capacity or derive the firm of the resources it needed; (3) the firm's inability to meets its customers' water utility needs resulted from a lack of wells, structural and maintenance problems, and the firm's inability to meet financial requirements for distribution system repairs; (4) the firm's authority to sell water did not constitute ownership or rights to the groundwater shared with the Army, since the state of Maryland initially drilled the wells; (5) the Army was not required to obtain the firm's permission, obtain a state water appropriation permit, or use surface water before pumping groundwater; and (6) the firm was not entitled to any compensation.

Jun 25, 2020

May 29, 2020

May 5, 2020

Apr 22, 2020

Mar 31, 2020

Mar 11, 2020

Mar 6, 2020

Mar 2, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here