Energy Management:
DOE Needs to Better Implement Conflict-of-Interest Controls
RCED-91-15: Published: Dec 26, 1990. Publicly Released: Jan 25, 1991.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
(202) 512-6082
contact@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of Energy's (DOE) controls over conflicts of interest in subcontracts awarded by its research centers, focusing on: (1) DOE policies and procedures for identifying and avoiding conflicts of interest; and (2) implementation of those policies.
GAO found that: (1) DOE regulations relied on subcontractors' self-reporting for identifying possible conflicts of interest; (2) DOE research centers did not properly implement conflict-of-interest determination policies and procedures; (3) the DOE Albuquerque Operations Office improperly allowed the Los Alamos and Sandia research centers to review subcontracts for conflicts of interest resulting in three cases of possible conflicts of interest; (4) Albuquerque failed to verify the accuracy of subcontractors' certifications; (5) Sandia's practices did not follow DOE regulations or approved procedures; (6) Los Alamos and Sandia failed to document their conflict-of-interest decisions; (7) DOE headquarters and the Albuquerque Operations Office failed to exercise proper oversight to ensure avoidance of conflict of interest; and (8) as a result of this review, Albuquerque began to bring its practices into compliance with DOE regulations. In addition, GAO noted that it was unable to test whether policies and procedures were effective, since Albuquerque had not properly implemented them.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: The DOE Albuquerque Operations Office found that the workload of potential conflict-of-interest cases is not as great as it originally estimated. A review of Albuquerque's procurement function by a headquarters team showed that Albuquerque was carrying out all of its conflict-of-interest activities.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Energy should ensure that the Albuquerque Operations Office has sufficient resources to carry out its conflict-of-interest responsibilities.
Agency Affected: Department of Energy
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: DOE approved revised procedures for Sandia and Los Alamos which require that subcontracts be forwarded to Albuquerque for OCI determinations. DOE plans to assess the research centers' compliance during the operations offices' periodic reviews.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Energy should direct the Manager, Albuquerque operations office, to ensure that its research centers forward subcontracts in the specified categories to Albuquerque for conflict-of-interest determinations.
Agency Affected: Department of Energy
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: DOE revised its criteria for assessing the application of conflict determinations by each contracting office. DOE officials stated that they have made conflict-of-interest issues a point of emphasis in DOE procurement management assistance reviews.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Energy should determine whether the conflict-of-interest problems identified at the Albuquerque operations office exist at other operations offices.
Agency Affected: Department of Energy
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: DOE stated that deficiencies found will be addressed by Albuquerque officials and then followed up quarterly until resolved. DOE stated that oversight will be enhanced by requiring inclusion of a sample of conflict actions in the judgmental sample of contract actions during quarterly surveillance.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Energy should direct the Manager, Albuquerque operations office, to ensure that: (1) Albuquerque's oversight reviews focus on the adequacy of Sandia's and Los Alamos' implementation of conflict-of-interest requirements; and (2) operations office officials follow up on research centers' actions to ensure that identified weaknesses are corrected.
Agency Affected: Department of Energy
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: DOE has highlighted and placed special emphasis on conflict-of-interest issues in its procurement management assistance reviews, according to DOE officials. If the operations offices do not perform adequately, the procurement executive will take corrective action.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Energy should ensure that the Director of Procurement, Assistance, and Program Management revises DOE headquarters' oversight procedures so that they rely less on self-disclosures by the operations offices to identify problems with the implementation of conflict-of-interest policies and procedures.
Agency Affected: Department of Energy
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: DOE conducted training on conflict policies and procedures in May 1991 to enable contractors and reviewers to recognize problems. Albuquerque will follow up to ensure that appropriate personnel have received this training.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Energy should direct the Manager, Albuquerque operations office, to explore options to improve the reliability of the conflict-of-interest information that its research centers' subcontractors submit. In exploring options, Albuquerque should consider reviewing a randomly selected sample of submissions and imposing administrative sanctions on subcontractors that submit incomplete or inaccurate information.
Agency Affected: Department of Energy
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: DOE stated that its policies and procedures now require decisions and actions to be documented and that when a field activity is less than satisfactory, corrective action will be taken.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Energy should direct the Manager, Albuquerque operations office, and the managers of its other operations offices, if appropriate, to take the necessary measures to ensure that conflict-of-interest decisions are well documented.
Agency Affected: Department of Energy
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Dec 10, 2020
-
Uranium Management:
Actions to Mitigate Risks to Domestic Supply Chain Could Be Better Planned and CoordinatedGAO-21-28: Published: Dec 10, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 10, 2020.
Dec 8, 2020
-
Offshore Wind Energy:
Planned Projects May Lead to Construction of New Vessels in the U.S., but Industry Has Made Few Decisions amid UncertaintiesGAO-21-153: Published: Dec 8, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 8, 2020.
Nov 19, 2020
-
Nuclear Waste Disposal:
Better Planning Needed to Avoid Potential Disruptions at Waste Isolation Pilot PlantGAO-21-48: Published: Nov 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2020.
Oct 29, 2020
-
Nuclear Safety:
DOE and the Safety Board Should Collaborate to Develop a Written Agreement to Enhance OversightGAO-21-141: Published: Oct 29, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 29, 2020.
Oct 15, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Plans to Modernize Critical Depleted Uranium Capabilities and Improve Program ManagementGAO-21-16: Published: Oct 15, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 15, 2020.
Jul 24, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
Action Needed to Address the W80-4 Warhead Program's Schedule ConstraintsGAO-20-409: Published: Jul 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jul 24, 2020.
Jun 24, 2020
-
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Analyzing Cost Savings Program Could Result in Wider Use and Additional Contractor EfficienciesGAO-20-451: Published: Jun 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 24, 2020.
Jun 9, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Needs to Incorporate Additional Management Controls Over Its Microelectronics ActivitiesGAO-20-357: Published: Jun 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 9, 2020.
May 13, 2020
-
Environmental Liabilities:
DOE Needs to Better Plan for Post-Cleanup Challenges Facing SitesGAO-20-373: Published: May 13, 2020. Publicly Released: May 13, 2020.
May 12, 2020
-
Hanford Waste Treatment Plant:
DOE Is Pursuing Pretreatment Alternatives, but Its Strategy Is Unclear While Costs Continue to RiseGAO-20-363: Published: May 12, 2020. Publicly Released: May 12, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here