Billions of Dollars Are Involved in Taxation of the Life Insurance Industry--Some Corrections in the Law Are Needed

PAD-81-1A: Published: Sep 17, 1981. Publicly Released: Sep 17, 1981.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

GAO examined the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code under which life insurance companies are taxed to determine whether the provisions, which were enacted in 1959 and have not been reviewed since, were in need of revision.

The Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act needs updating to reflect substantial changes in the industry and the economy. The Act contained a number of controversial provisions. Also, many features of the Act were written to tax the industry when it was dominated by mutual companies, whole life insurance was the predominant product sold, the rate of inflation was low, and earning rates on investments were much lower than current rates. Special features in the Act recognized the competitive balance between mutual and stock companies, the importance of fostering the survival of small life insurance companies, and the long-term nature of the life insurance business. In the past 20 years, the balance in the industry has shifted, and mutual companies no longer dominate. The lines of business that life insurance companies write have shifted from whole life to term and group insurance. There has been a dramatic increase in the pension line of business and tax-deferred annuities. Policy loan provisions have induced unanticipated demands on life insurance company assets in recent years. Because of these factors, Congress should consider changing sections of the Act which deal with the method by which the reserve deduction, that portion of current income necessary to meet future obligations, is calculated. Taxable income should be redefined as well as the method for approximating those reserves that are computed on a preliminary term basis.

Matters for Congressional Consideration

  1. Status:

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Matter: Congress should determine the extent of any abuses of reinsurance and examine Section 802 of the Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act of 1959 as it refers to modified coinsurance in any evaluation of the Act.

  2. Status:

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Matter: Congress should amend Section 805(b)(4) of the Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act of 1959 to clarify the definition of assets.

  3. Status:

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Matter: Congress should consider amending Section 804(c)(1) of the Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act of 1959 to provide a specific definition of investment expenses.

  4. Status:

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Matter: Congress should consider amending Section 801(b) of the Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act of 1959 which defines life insurance reserves.

  5. Status:

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Matter: Congress should amend the language of Section 801(a) of the Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act of 1959 to define a life insurance company.

  6. Status:

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Matter: When considering the issue of deferred annuities, Congress should decide the issue of taxation at the corporate or individual level.

  7. Status:

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Matter: Congress should amend the legislation to allow only $15 per thousand dollars of the amount at risk in revaluing reserves for permanent insurance plans.

  8. Status:

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Matter: Congress should amend Sections 802(b) and 815(c)(2)(A) of the Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act of 1959 to reflect the current condition of the life insurance industry. There should be no automatic deferral of half the excess of gain from operations over taxable investment income for all life insurance companies. However, eliminating this deferral should be gradual and indexed according to the age of the individual company.

  9. Status:

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Matter: Congress should consider selecting as an alternative to replacing the 10 to 1 rule for adjusting reserves one of the following: (1) substituting the interest based on assumed rates for the 10 to 1 adjustment, the free interest method; (2) replacing the 10 to 1 rule with a reserve deduction based on a geometric approximation that provides a larger reserve deduction in the current economic environment; or (3) substituting a 4.5 percent maximum for the average earnings rate with either the 10 to 1 reserve adjustment or with the geometric reserve adjustment.

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Oct 19, 2020

Sep 23, 2020

Aug 31, 2020

Jun 29, 2020

Jun 16, 2020

May 1, 2020

Apr 30, 2020

  • tax icon, source: Eyewire

    Priority Open Recommendations:

    Internal Revenue Service
    GAO-20-548PR: Published: Apr 23, 2020. Publicly Released: Apr 30, 2020.

Apr 1, 2020

Mar 2, 2020

Feb 26, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here