Defense Acquisition Infrastructure:

Changes in RDT&E Laboratories and Centers

NSIAD-96-221BR: Published: Sep 13, 1996. Publicly Released: Oct 15, 1996.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of Defense's (DOD) research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) infrastructure, focusing on: (1) actions DOD took to implement previous recommendations made about its infrastructure; and (2) RDT&E infrastructure funding, workforce composition, and operating costs.

GAO found that: (1) studies of DOD's laboratories and centers have reported excess capacity, but generally have made recommendations focusing on management efficiencies rather than infrastructure reductions; (2) despite four base realignment and closure (BRAC) rounds, reductions in DOD's infrastructure have not kept pace with reductions in funding, personnel, and force structure levels; (3) according to DOD officials, after all current BRAC actions have been completed, DOD's laboratory infrastructure still will have an excess capacity of approximately 35 percent; (4) officials believe that DOD lost opportunities in the BRAC 1995 process to reduce laboratory infrastructure by splitting the analysis of research and development (R&D) laboratories and test and evaluation (T&E) centers and because each service tried to protect its own facilities instead of adopting cross-service efficiencies; (5) in contrast to reductions in DOD's overall operations and maintenance, procurement, and RDT&E funding since FY 1990, the same accounts have been rising for its laboratories and centers; (6) limitations in the data available make it difficult for DOD to analyze fully trends in DOD's R&D laboratory and T&E center infrastructure, since: (a) each service has its own distinct laboratory and center organizational structure; (b) a significant discrepancy in data available about the laboratory workforce prevents an analysis of trends in workforce composition; (c) because each service has its own financial system to support unique organizational structures, management approaches, and cultures, DOD has multiple systems reporting disparate elements; and (d) as a result of these factors, DOD is unable to determine the true cost of operating its laboratory and center infrastructure; (7) as part of an ongoing study of successful RDT&E infrastructure consolidations, GAO is reviewing laboratory and center reductions undertaken by the United Kingdom and private industry in the United States; and (8) British government officials and private industry representatives said that to consolidate their RDT&E infrastructure, they needed: (a) clearly defined, comparable terms for RDT&E organizations and their infrastructure elements; (b) accurate, reliable, and comparable financial data; and (c) accurate and reliable data about the composition of the workforce.

Apr 18, 2018

Apr 17, 2018

Apr 16, 2018

Apr 11, 2018

Mar 29, 2018

Mar 27, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

Feb 28, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here