Intelligence Programs:

Inquiry Into Contracting Practices for a Classified Program

NSIAD-94-109: Published: Feb 28, 1994. Publicly Released: Mar 11, 1994.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed an Air Force prime contractor's subcontract award for an electronic warfare component subsystem, focusing on a small disadvantaged business's (SDB) allegations that the prime contractor: (1) negotiated a lower bid price with a competitor but did not allow it to lower its bid; (2) used weighting factors in its bid evaluation process that discriminated against it; (3) earmarked the subcontract for a competitor; and (4) did not apply a SDB preference during its bid evaluation.

GAO found that: (1) contrary to its assertions, the SDB was not the low bidder; (2) the awardee increased its bid by more than 25 percent, but remained the low bidder; (3) the prime contractor consistently applied the prioritization and weighted factors specified in the solicitation; (4) there was no evidence that the Air Force or the prime contractor earmarked the subcontract for the awardee; (5) the prime contractor was not required to apply a SDB preference during its bid evaluation, and there would have been no significant change in the firms' ranking if the preference had been applied; (6) the prime contractor did not provide the SDB with some of the information it requested about the procurement because the procurement was classified; and (7) the SDB could accept the prime contractor's offer to provide a debriefing conference to obtain information that may assist it in improving its competitiveness in the future.

Jul 9, 2020

Jul 1, 2020

Jun 25, 2020

Jun 15, 2020

Jun 9, 2020

May 28, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here