Contract Pricing:
Defense Contractor Contributions to the Software Productivity Consortium
NSIAD-89-74: Published: Jul 24, 1989. Publicly Released: Jul 24, 1989.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed selected defense contractors' classification of independent research and development (IR&D) expenses, focusing on whether the contractors could classify an industry consortium's activities and member companies' contributions as IR&D expenses.
GAO found that: (1) the Department of Defense (DOD) allowed member companies to treat their contributions to the consortium as manufacturing and production engineering expenses because the consortium's activities enhanced the production process but were not for resale; (2) some consortium activities would be more appropriately classified as IR&D; (3) there was no evidence that the consortium's activities improved member companies' internal manufacturing and production capabilities; and (4) all but one of the member companies charged their entire consortium contributions to overhead accounts other than IR&D.
Recommendation for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) conducted a nationwide review of the consortium and, using DOD technical assistance, categorized the consortium's efforts as IR&D on manufacturing and production engineering. An accomplishment report is not warranted.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct DOD personnel to determine whether: (1) the Software Productivity Consortium's actual activities meet the Federal Acquisition Regulation criteria for IR&D or manufacturing and production engineering; and (2) member companies have properly classified their contributions to the consortium.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
Oct 11, 2018
![defense icon, source: [West Covina, California] Progressive Management, 2008](https://www.gao.gov/images/rip/defense.jpg "defense icon, source: [West Covina, California] Progressive Management, 2008")
Document Services:
DOD Should Take Actions to Achieve Further EfficienciesGAO-19-71: Published: Oct 11, 2018. Publicly Released: Oct 11, 2018.
Oct 10, 2018
-
Air Force Readiness:
Actions Needed to Rebuild Readiness and Prepare for the FutureGAO-19-120T: Published: Oct 10, 2018. Publicly Released: Oct 10, 2018.
Oct 9, 2018
-
Weapon Systems Cybersecurity:
DOD Just Beginning to Grapple with Scale of VulnerabilitiesGAO-19-128: Published: Oct 9, 2018. Publicly Released: Oct 9, 2018.
Sep 24, 2018
-
Defense Efficiency Initiatives:
Observations on DOD's Reported Reductions to Its Headquarters and Administrative ActivitiesGAO-18-688R: Published: Sep 24, 2018. Publicly Released: Sep 24, 2018.
Sep 20, 2018
-
Biological Select Agents and Toxins:
Actions Needed to Improve Management of DOD's Biosafety and Biosecurity ProgramGAO-18-422: Published: Sep 20, 2018. Publicly Released: Sep 20, 2018.
Sep 10, 2018
-
Weapon System Sustainment:
Selected Air Force and Navy Aircraft Generally Have Not Met Availability Goals, and DOD and Navy Guidance Need to Be ClarifiedGAO-18-678: Published: Sep 10, 2018. Publicly Released: Sep 10, 2018.
Sep 6, 2018
-
Defense Management:
DOD Needs to Address Inefficiencies and Implement Reform across Its Defense Agencies and DOD Field ActivitiesGAO-18-592: Published: Sep 6, 2018. Publicly Released: Sep 6, 2018.
Sep 5, 2018
-
Military Education:
Reporting Requirements on Air Force Enlisted Personnel Attending Officer TrainingGAO-18-649R: Published: Sep 5, 2018. Publicly Released: Sep 5, 2018.
Sep 4, 2018
-
DEFENSE INFRASTRUCTURE:
Guidance Needed to Develop Metrics and Implement Cybersecurity Requirements for Utilities Privatization ContractsGAO-18-558: Published: Sep 4, 2018. Publicly Released: Sep 4, 2018. -
Defense Logistics:
DOD Needs to Improve Budget Estimates and Accuracy of Forecasts for Airlift ServicesGAO-18-557: Published: Sep 4, 2018. Publicly Released: Sep 4, 2018.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here
Explore our Key Issues on National Defense
- Best Practices and Leading Practices in Acquisition Management
- Countering Overseas Threats
- DOD Approach to Business Transformation - High Risk Issue
- DOD Contract Management - High Risk Issue
- DOD Supply Chain Management - High Risk Issue
- DOD Support Infrastructure Management - High Risk Issue
- DOD Weapon Systems Acquisition - High Risk Issue
- Energy Management in DOD Facilities
- Ensuring the Effective Protection of Technologies Critical to U.S. National Security Interests - High Risk Issue
- Military Base Realignments and Closures
- Military Force Sizing and Organization
- NASA Acquisitions - High Risk Issue
- National Defense System Acquisitions
- Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response
- Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones)
- U.S. Arctic Interests
- U.S. - China Economic and Military Relations
Explore our other Key Issues here
