The Army Needs More Comprehensive Evaluations To Make Effective Use of Its Weapon System Testing
NSIAD-84-40: Published: Feb 24, 1984. Publicly Released: Feb 24, 1984.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
(202) 275-4141
contact@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
Evaluations of development and operational tests are used to assess the progress of new weapon systems as they proceed through development. As part of its continuing assessment of major weapon system acquisition management, GAO reviewed the Army evaluation process and discussed improvements that could better inform decisionmakers about a system's progress in development and operational effectiveness.
GAO found that Army evaluators have not been giving acquisition officials adequate technical and operational evaluations to fully assess weapons' development progress and potential combat usefulness. In most cases, the evaluations seldom went beyond reciting the test results and did not address critical issues, such as the consequences of fielding the system before resolving remaining technical problems. Evaluations need to be broadened and integrated to provide a more meaningful and coherent picture of system development progress and potential operational effectiveness. This will require greater participation by Army analysts in planning evaluations and in determining the technical and operational implications of test findings.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Army should seek the Army Systems Acquisition Review Council decisionmakers' concurrence on critical issues that are to be evaluated for each proposed weapon system.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense: Department of the Army
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Army should transmit these issues to the pertinent Army test evaluation and analysis organizations so that they can be addressed in the test reports and analyses which they will be providing for inclusion in the overall evaluation of new systems.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense: Department of the Army
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Army should prepare, for critical major acquisition decision points, a comprehensive evaluation of the weapon system under review by integrating the reports and analyses of the individual test evaluation and analysis organizations.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense: Department of the Army
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: The Army has decided to have the Operational Test and Evaluation Agency assume the role of spokesperson for the test evaluation and analysis organizations at the Army Systems Acquisition Review Council.
Recommendation: One of the three main Army analysis organizations should assume the role of spokesman for the test evaluation and analysis organizations at the Army Systems Acquisition Review Council and before other decisionmaking bodies.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense: Department of the Army
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Army should make the Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity responsible for providing risk assessments to the decisionmakers.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense: Department of the Army
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Feb 26, 2021
-
Defense Transportation:
DOD Can Better Leverage Existing Contested Mobility Studies and Improve TrainingGAO-21-125: Published: Feb 26, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 26, 2021.
Feb 25, 2021
-
Military Service Uniforms:
DOD Could Better Identify and Address Out-of-Pocket Cost InequitiesGAO-21-120: Published: Feb 25, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 25, 2021.
Feb 24, 2021
-
Defense Budget:
Opportunities Exist to Improve DOD's Management of Defense SpendingGAO-21-415T: Published: Feb 24, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 24, 2021.
Feb 22, 2021
-
Service Acquisitions:
DOD's Report to Congress Identifies Steps Taken to Improve Management, But Does Not Address Some Key Planning IssuesGAO-21-267R: Published: Feb 22, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 22, 2021.
Jan 21, 2021
-
Close Air Support:
Actions Needed to Enhance Friendly Force Tracking Capabilities and Fully Evaluate TrainingGAO-21-99: Published: Jan 21, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 21, 2021.
Jan 19, 2021
-
GPS Modernization:
DOD Continuing to Develop New Jam-Resistant Capability, But Widespread Use Remains Years AwayGAO-21-145: Published: Jan 19, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 19, 2021.
Jan 14, 2021
-
Columbia Class Submarine:
Delivery Hinges on Timely and Quality Materials from an Atrophied Supplier BaseGAO-21-257: Published: Jan 14, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 14, 2021. -
Department of Defense:
Actions Needed to Improve Accounting of Intradepartmental TransactionsGAO-21-84: Published: Jan 14, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 14, 2021.
Jan 12, 2021
-
DOD Critical Technologies:
Plans for Communicating, Assessing, and Overseeing Protection Efforts Should Be CompletedGAO-21-158: Published: Jan 12, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 12, 2021.
Dec 10, 2020
-
Climate Resilience:
DOD Coordinates with Communities, but Needs to Assess the Performance of Related Grant ProgramsGAO-21-46: Published: Dec 10, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 10, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here