Management and Control of Personal Property Is Poor and Procurement Controls Should Be Strengthened at U.S. Embassies in Latin America
ID-80-23: Published: Feb 11, 1980. Publicly Released: Feb 11, 1980.
- Full Report:
Earlier GAO reports identified problems in the management of nonexpendable personal property at U.S. embassies overseas. A review of current administrative practices was performed at three U.S. embassies and one U.S. consulate.
Although the State Department's Inspector General had reported deficiencies as recently as 1977, GAO found that management of personal property remained unsatisfactory. Excess property and the potential for loss of property existed at all four locations visited. It was also found that officials did not follow procurement regulations and prudent management practices to the degree necessary to protect the best interests of the United States. Key personnel with whom GAO discussed these administrative deficiencies cited several contributing factors: (1) the need for more comprehensive training for administrative personnel; (2) frequent turnover of personnel under the State Department's rotation program which inhibits problem-solving and needed continuity; (3) personnel reductions which have encouraged the use of personal service contracts and, in some cases, prevented adequate separation of duties; and (4) conditions peculiar to overseas locations such as language barriers and shortage of qualified contractors and adequate supply sources which often prevent strict compliance.
Recommendation for Executive Action
Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.
Recommendation: The Secretary of State should: (1) ensure that written procedures and guidelines are implemented at the posts for critical administrative functions to facilitate compliance with regulations; (2) reemphasize the importance of the administrative function and the need for principal officers and administrative officials at the posts to ensure that regulations are followed and management procedures and controls are properly implemented; (3) ensure that administrative personnel participate in the State Department's training programs, especially at the entry level; (4) ensure that efforts are made to identify existing personal service contracts and, to the extent possible, discontinue them and avoid future contracts of this nature; and (5) emphasize the need for post officials to ensure that actions promised in response to Inspector General recommendations are completed.