Medical Malpractice:

Alternatives to Litigation

HRD-92-28: Published: Jan 10, 1992. Publicly Released: Jan 10, 1992.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed voluntary arbitration programs and other alternatives for resolving medical malpractice claims.

GAO found that: (1) 15 states have specific statutes on medical malpractice arbitration, but only Michigan makes patients aware of the arbitration option and established a program to implement its statutory requirements; (2) in those 15 states, arbitration appears to be seldom used; (3) Virginia and Florida enacted statutes authorizing no-fault programs to resolve birth-related neurological injury claims; (4) Virginia and Florida officials believe that the reasons the claims volume has been so include the long filling time and the small size of the targeted population; (5) as a condition of enrollment, two health maintenance organizations (HMO) mandate the use of arbitration to resolve malpractice claims; (6) HMO officials stated that mandatory arbitration has been successful, since it results in faster claims resolution, lower defense costs, and more predictable and equitable decisions; and (7) Maine has initiated a demonstration project to establish standards of care in four medical specialties, which gives physicians immunity from litigation if they follow the standards.

Sep 5, 2018

Jul 18, 2018

Jul 16, 2018

Jun 27, 2018

May 31, 2018

May 17, 2018

Apr 18, 2018

Apr 12, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here