Discretionary Grants:
Opportunities To Improve Federal Discretionary Award Practices
HRD-86-108: Published: Sep 15, 1986. Publicly Released: Oct 15, 1986.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
(202) 275-2854
contact@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed federal management of discretionary assistance programs, specifically the policies and practices agency officials use to decide which eligible applicants receive awards and how much they receive.
GAO found that: (1) most federal discretionary grant programs have competitive processes to solicit and review applications; (2) nearly two-thirds attempt to solicit applications from all eligible applicants; and (3) over three-fourths use persons from outside the program office to provide an independent perspective in the review of applications. GAO believes that the discretionary grant process could be strengthened in many programs to enhance competition and promote accountability for award decisions through: (1) more rigorous review of unsolicited applications; (2) internal review of decisions restricting the scope of applicant solicitation; (3) the use of independent reviews; and (4) managerial accountability for deviation from reviewers' recommendations in the award decision process.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: The PCMI "Discretionary Grants" publication did not directly adopt the recommendation. However, the publication advised agencies to use multiple solicitations. No options were given to the agencies to restrict solicitation. With regard to non-use of independent reviews, special procedures were advised during the decision making process to refer decisionmaking to a higher authority.
Recommendation: The Director, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), through the President's Council on Management Improvement (PCMI), should work with federal agencies to require written justification reviewable by high-level agency officials for grant award practices that restrict widespread solicitation of all eligible applicants, and that do not use at least some independent officials outside the program office to review applications.
Agency Affected: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: The PCMI "Discretionary Grants" publication implements the recommendation as stated.
Recommendation: The Director, OMB, through PCMI, should work with federal agencies to require program managers to provide written justification for award decisions that deviate from reviewers' recommendations.
Agency Affected: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: The PCMI "Discretionary Grants" publication implements the recommendation as stated.
Recommendation: The Director, OMB, through PCMI, should work with federal agencies to require approval, at a level higher than the program managers, for funding unsolicited applications.
Agency Affected: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: The PCMI "Discretionary Grants" publication implements the recommendation as stated.
Recommendation: The Director, OMB, through PCMI, should recognize the discretionary grant award process as a potentially vulnerable area for review under the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA).
Agency Affected: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Mar 2, 2021
-
High-Risk Series:
Dedicated Leadership Needed to Address Limited Progress in Most High-Risk AreasGAO-21-119SP: Published: Mar 2, 2021. Publicly Released: Mar 2, 2021. -
High-Risk Series:
Dedicated Leadership Needed to Address Limited Progress in Most High-Risk AreasGAO-21-383T: Published: Mar 2, 2021. Publicly Released: Mar 2, 2021.
Feb 3, 2021
-
Fixed-Price-Incentive Contracts:
DOD Has Increased Their Use but Should Assess Contributions to OutcomesGAO-21-181: Published: Feb 3, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 3, 2021.
Jan 29, 2021
-
Federal Real Property:
Additional Documentation of Decision Making Could Improve Transparency of New Disposal ProcessGAO-21-233: Published: Jan 29, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 29, 2021.
Jan 19, 2021
-
Federal Rulemaking:
Selected EPA and HHS Regulatory Analyses Met Several Best Practices, but CMS Should Take Steps to Strengthen Its AnalysesGAO-21-151: Published: Dec 17, 2020. Publicly Released: Jan 19, 2021.
Jan 13, 2021
-
Department of Energy Contracting:
Improvements Needed to Ensure DOE Assesses Its Full Range of Contracting Fraud RisksGAO-21-44: Published: Jan 13, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 13, 2021.
Dec 16, 2020
-
Data Governance:
Agencies Made Progress in Establishing Governance, but Need to Address Key MilestonesGAO-21-152: Published: Dec 16, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 16, 2020.
Dec 9, 2020
-
2020 Census:
The Bureau Concluded Field Work but Uncertainty about Data Quality, Accuracy, and Protection RemainsGAO-21-206R: Published: Dec 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 9, 2020.
Dec 3, 2020
-
2020 Census:
Census Bureau Needs to Assess Data Quality Concerns Stemming from Recent Design ChangesGAO-21-142: Published: Dec 3, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 3, 2020. -
2020 Census:
Census Bureau Needs to Ensure Transparency over Data QualityGAO-21-262T: Published: Dec 3, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 3, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here