Federal Downsizing:

The Costs and Savings of Buyouts Versus Reductions-in-Force

GGD-96-63: Published: May 14, 1996. Publicly Released: May 24, 1996.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed federal workforce downsizing, focusing on the projected costs and savings from federal workforce buyouts and reductions-in-force (RIF) over a 5-year period.

GAO found that: (1) employee buyouts could produce over $60,000 more in net savings over 5 years than RIF for each vacated position because buyouts can be used at higher grade levels that generate more savings in salaries and benefits when downsized; (2) if federal agencies separate retirement-eligible employees who do not displace lower-grade employees, RIF could produce about $29,000 more in net savings over 5 years than buyouts; (3) displacing employees in the same competitive areas but lower-tenure groups or with less service within the same tenure groups reduces RIF savings because those savings represent the salaries and benefits of lower-grade employees; (4) savings from buyouts or RIF could be reduced if the vacated positions are refilled or privatized; (5) federal agencies may need more buyouts than RIF to achieve their downsizing targets because normal attrition slows prior to buyouts; (6) buyouts avoid or reduce the non-economic adverse effects of RIF, such as reduced diversity, decreased productivity, and lower morale; and (7) buyouts may help federal agencies improve diversity, since buyouts typically affect older white males.

Feb 25, 2020

Dec 30, 2019

Oct 10, 2019

Oct 2, 2019

Sep 25, 2019

Sep 11, 2019

Aug 15, 2019

Jul 30, 2019

May 23, 2019

Apr 29, 2019

Looking for more? Browse all our products here