U.S.-Chilean Trade:
Pesticide Standards and Concerns Regarding Chilean Sanitary Rules
GGD-94-198: Published: Sep 28, 1994. Publicly Released: Oct 14, 1994.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO: (1) compared U.S. and Chilean processes for registering pesticides, setting pesticide residue tolerances for food, and monitoring compliance with these tolerances; (2) reviewed whether Chilean sanitary rules restrict potential U.S. agricultural exports; (3) reviewed Chile's environmental regulatory structure; and (4) discussed pesticide risks from imported Chilean pine logs.
GAO found that: (1) the United States and Chile have relatively open processes for setting pesticide standards; (2) the countries' different standards and procedures for registering pesticides have not impeded agricultural trade between the two countries; (3) the United States sets its pesticide residue tolerances independently, while Chile accepts international standards; (4) the United States routinely monitors all types of domestic and imported foods for pesticide residues, but Chile only routinely monitors certain domestic dairy products and samples for particular pesticide residues; (5) Chilean exporters have established extensive controls to ensure that their exports meet U.S. standards and their violation rate is significantly lower than that of all other foreign countries; (6) certain Chilean sanitary rules, or the lack thereof, could impede U.S. exports of some agricultural products; (7) Chile's process for establishing sanitary regulations is not always clear and Chile lacks formal procedures that would facilitate U.S. access to Chilean markets; (8) U.S. officials are working with Chilean officials to resolve pesticide and sanitary issues in advance of formal negotiations on a free trade agreement between the two countries; and (9) efforts are under way to find a substitute for treatment of imported pine logs with methyl bromide, an ozone depleter that is being phased out.
Dec 9, 2020
-
International Trade:
Observations On Whether Women's Rights and Economic Interests Are Protected or Promoted by U.S. Trade Preference ProgramsGAO-21-190: Published: Dec 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 9, 2020.
Dec 2, 2020
-
Foreign Assistance:
USAID Should Analyze Data on the Timeliness of ExpendituresGAO-21-51: Published: Dec 2, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 2, 2020.
Nov 19, 2020
-
Global Food Security:
Information on Spending and Types of Assistance Provided by the United States and Other DonorsGAO-21-47R: Published: Nov 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2020.
Nov 9, 2020
-
Human Trafficking:
Agencies Have Taken Steps to Strengthen International Anti-trafficking ProjectsGAO-21-53: Published: Nov 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 9, 2020. -
Rule of Law Assistance:
State and USAID Could Improve Monitoring EffortsGAO-21-14: Published: Nov 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 9, 2020.
Oct 27, 2020
-
Forced Labor Imports:
DHS Increased Resources and Enforcement Efforts, but Needs to Improve Workforce Planning and MonitoringGAO-21-106: Published: Oct 27, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 27, 2020.
Oct 2, 2020
-
Combating Wildlife Trafficking:
Agencies Work to Address Human Rights Abuse Allegations in Overseas Conservation ProgramsGAO-21-139R: Published: Oct 2, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 2, 2020.
Sep 22, 2020
-
Cyber Diplomacy:
State Has Not Involved Relevant Federal Agencies in the Development of Its Plan to Establish the Cyberspace Security and Emerging Technologies BureauGAO-20-607R: Published: Sep 22, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 22, 2020.
Sep 15, 2020
-
Steel and Aluminum Tariffs:
Commerce Should Improve Its Exclusion Request Process and Economic Impact ReviewsGAO-20-517: Published: Sep 15, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 15, 2020.
Sep 14, 2020
-
Conflict Minerals:
Actions Needed to Assess Progress Addressing Armed Groups' Exploitation of MineralsGAO-20-595: Published: Sep 14, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 14, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here