Tax-Exempt Bonds:
Retirement Center Bonds Were Risky and Benefited Moderate-Income Elderly
GGD-91-50: Published: Mar 29, 1991. Publicly Released: Mar 29, 1991.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the: (1) extent to which charitable organizations used tax-exempt bonds to finance elderly housing; (2) characteristics of the housing facilities and the residents; and (3) extent to which and reasons why housing facilities defaulted on their tax-exempt bonds.
GAO found that: (1) from 1980 through 1990, charitable organizations issued 271 tax-exempt bonds totalling $2.8 billion to finance 221 elderly housing facilities; (2) about half of those bonds represented about 90 percent of the construction, expansion, and furnishings costs; (3) monthly and entrance fees varied depending upon the amount of debt, resident's choice of living arrangements, health care and assistance, and amenities; (4) 75 percent of the facilities housed residents with average incomes greater than $15,000, about 27 percent of the nation's elderly, but it was unrealistic to expect that similar projects financed solely by bonds would be available to the majority of elderly persons with incomes below $15,000; (5) bond subsidies could encourage charitable organizations to assist elderly persons who can not afford private, for-profit units; (6) between 1980 and 1989, the overall default rate for retirement center bonds was about 20 percent, and about 1 percent for selected revenue bonds; (7) studies of defaulted projects indicated that the facilities were highly debt-financed and the bonds' interest rates were high; (8) inadequate financial structures coupled with inexperienced developers and overestimated market projections made many facilities vulnerable to default; and (9) policies reducing the possibility of default could preclude successful projects from being undertaken if the sponsoring organization lacked resources to provide sufficient equity.
Oct 30, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
Other Countries' Experiences with Caregiver PoliciesGAO-20-623: Published: Sep 30, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 30, 2020.
Sep 24, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
Older Women Report Facing a Financially Uncertain FutureGAO-20-718T: Published: Sep 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 24, 2020.
Aug 28, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
DOL Could Better Inform Divorcing Parties About Dividing SavingsGAO-20-541: Published: Jul 31, 2020. Publicly Released: Aug 28, 2020.
Aug 13, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
Older Women Report Facing a Financially Uncertain FutureGAO-20-435: Published: Jul 14, 2020. Publicly Released: Aug 13, 2020.
Jun 16, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
BLS Should Explore Ways to Improve the Accuracy, Timeliness, and Relevance of Its Cost-of-Living MeasurementsGAO-20-422: Published: Jun 16, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 16, 2020.
Feb 27, 2020
-
Private Pensions:
IRS and DOL Should Strengthen Oversight of Executive Retirement PlansGAO-20-70: Published: Jan 28, 2020. Publicly Released: Feb 27, 2020.
Jan 9, 2020
-
Social Security Disability:
Action Needed to Help Agency Staff Understand and Follow Policies Related to Prescription Opioid MisuseGAO-20-120: Published: Jan 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Jan 9, 2020.
Dec 18, 2019
-
Capitol Police:
Potential Effects of Raising the Mandatory Retirement AgeGAO-20-137R: Published: Dec 18, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 18, 2019. -
Millennial Generation:
Information on the Economic Status of Millennial Households Compared to Previous GenerationsGAO-20-194: Published: Dec 13, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 18, 2019.
Oct 21, 2019
-
Military Pensions:
Servicemembers Need Better Information to Support Retirement Savings DecisionsGAO-19-631: Published: Sep 19, 2019. Publicly Released: Oct 21, 2019.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here