Federal Employees:
Early Retirements at the Defense Department in Fiscal Year 1988
GGD-89-53FS: Published: Feb 23, 1989. Publicly Released: Feb 23, 1989.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
In response to a congressional request, GAO examined the Department of Defense's (DOD) management of the voluntary early retirement program authorized in fiscal year (FY) 1988 because of budget reductions, focusing on the cost and possible adverse effect of large numbers of DOD civilian employees choosing early retirement.
GAO found that: (1) employees are eligible for voluntary early retirement when an agency undergoes a major reduction-in-force due to budget reductions; (2) in FY 1988, 9,611 of the 65,216 DOD employees eligible for retirement elected to retire early, and DOD approved 96 percent; (3) 15,763 of the Army Materiel Command's employees were eligible for early retirement and 2,877 retired, while the Air Force Logistics Center in Oklahoma had 2,345 employees eligible and 634 retired; (4) the Army showed an average budgetary saving of $23,076 per retiree in FY 1988, but due to budget outlays from the Civil Service Retirement Fund, the net cost per retiree was $9,146; and (5) the Army Materiel Command filled 931 of its early retirement vacancies, while the Air Force Center hired 1,282 new employees. GAO also found that: (1) the Army Material Command and Air Force Center took actions to save money during FY 1988 in addition to granting early retirements, including a partial hiring freeze, which saved $25 million, release of temporary employees, which saved $10 million, and reductions in overtime, travel, and a summer hire program, which saved $12 million; (2) the Army received congressional approval to reprogram other appropriated funds in August 1988, which it used to hire more employees, while the Air Force Center substantially froze new hiring for FY 1988, limited overtime, and reduced temporary employees and performance awards; and (3) Army and Air Force officials stated that early retirements of employees in hard-to-fill positions did not affect their missions.
Feb 24, 2021
Financial Services:
Fair Lending, Access, and Retirement SecurityGAO-21-399T: Published: Feb 24, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 24, 2021.
Jan 19, 2021
-
Elder Justice:
HHS Could Do More to Encourage State Reporting on the Costs of Financial ExploitationGAO-21-90: Published: Dec 18, 2020. Publicly Released: Jan 19, 2021.
Oct 30, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
Other Countries' Experiences with Caregiver PoliciesGAO-20-623: Published: Sep 30, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 30, 2020.
Sep 24, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
Older Women Report Facing a Financially Uncertain FutureGAO-20-718T: Published: Sep 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 24, 2020.
Aug 28, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
DOL Could Better Inform Divorcing Parties About Dividing SavingsGAO-20-541: Published: Jul 31, 2020. Publicly Released: Aug 28, 2020.
Aug 13, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
Older Women Report Facing a Financially Uncertain FutureGAO-20-435: Published: Jul 14, 2020. Publicly Released: Aug 13, 2020.
Jun 16, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
BLS Should Explore Ways to Improve the Accuracy, Timeliness, and Relevance of Its Cost-of-Living MeasurementsGAO-20-422: Published: Jun 16, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 16, 2020.
Feb 27, 2020
-
Private Pensions:
IRS and DOL Should Strengthen Oversight of Executive Retirement PlansGAO-20-70: Published: Jan 28, 2020. Publicly Released: Feb 27, 2020.
Jan 9, 2020
-
Social Security Disability:
Action Needed to Help Agency Staff Understand and Follow Policies Related to Prescription Opioid MisuseGAO-20-120: Published: Jan 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Jan 9, 2020.
Dec 18, 2019
-
Capitol Police:
Potential Effects of Raising the Mandatory Retirement AgeGAO-20-137R: Published: Dec 18, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 18, 2019.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here
Explore our Key Issues on Retirement Security
Explore our other Key Issues here
