Reassignment of Senior Executive Service Members at the Department of the Interior
GGD-84-19: Published: Nov 4, 1983. Publicly Released: Nov 9, 1983.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
In response to a congressional request, GAO examined the reassignments of Senior Executive Service (SES) members under the Department of the Interior's Career Enhancement Program, focusing on the stated reasons for the reassignments in light of allegations that they were used to punish or isolate career executives who had been most effective in administering programs to which the administration was hostile.
The purpose of the Career Enhancement Program was to promote executive mobility, professional development, and cross-training of managers. GAO found that very few involuntary reassignments were made during the program. However, there appeared to be confusion among some reassigned members regarding how the program worked, and several senior executives had negative attitudes toward it. The agency viewed the reassignments as a way of unifying diverse operating groups, enhancing senior executives' careers, and balancing management resources throughout the agency. Although 27.4 percent of Interior's eligible executives were to have been reassigned by September 30, 1983, only 19.5 percent were actually reassigned by that date. The program resulted in more moves between bureaus than before. GAO found that 3 senior executives considered their reassignments to be involuntary; 19 had accepted reassignment without protest; 8 had sought reassignments; and 4 believed that they were being reassigned for political or punitive reasons. GAO found that those SES members choosing not to accept reassignments placed themselves in jeopardy of being removed or demoted. Most of the executives interviewed felt that professional development was not the goal of the program. GAO stated that increased communication between program administrators and SES members might have helped to alleviate the negative feelings which some employees had about their reassignments.
Jan 12, 2021
-
DHS Employee Morale:
Some Improvements Made, but Additional Actions Needed to Strengthen Employee EngagementGAO-21-204: Published: Jan 12, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 12, 2021.
Sep 16, 2020
-
Senior Executive Service:
Opportunities for Selected Agencies to Improve Their Career Reassignment ProcessesGAO-20-559: Published: Sep 16, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 16, 2020.
Feb 25, 2020
-
State Department:
Additional Steps Are Needed to Identify Potential Barriers to DiversityGAO-20-237: Published: Jan 27, 2020. Publicly Released: Feb 25, 2020.
Dec 30, 2019
-
Office of Congressional Workplace Rights:
Using Key Management Practices Would Help to Fully Implement Statutory RequirementsGAO-20-222: Published: Dec 30, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 30, 2019.
Oct 10, 2019
-
Department of Veterans Affairs:
Improved Succession Planning Would Help Address Long-Standing Workforce ProblemsGAO-20-15: Published: Oct 10, 2019. Publicly Released: Oct 10, 2019.
Oct 2, 2019
-
Defense Workforce:
Steps Needed to Identify Acquisition Training Needs for Non-Acquisition Personnel [Reissued with revisions on Oct. 2, 2019.]GAO-19-556: Published: Sep 5, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 5, 2019.
Sep 25, 2019
-
Federal Workforce:
Talent Management Strategies to Help Agencies Better Compete in a Tight Labor MarketGAO-19-723T: Published: Sep 25, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 25, 2019.
Sep 11, 2019
-
USAID Reform:
Efforts Address Most Key Practices but Could Improve in Performance Assessment and Strategic Workforce PlanningGAO-19-609: Published: Sep 11, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 11, 2019.
Aug 15, 2019
-
Defense Acquisition Workforce:
DOD Increased Use of Human Capital Flexibilities but Could Improve MonitoringGAO-19-509: Published: Aug 15, 2019. Publicly Released: Aug 15, 2019.
Jul 30, 2019
-
Human Capital:
Improving Federal Recruiting and Hiring EffortsGAO-19-696T: Published: Jul 30, 2019. Publicly Released: Jul 30, 2019.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here