U.S. Customs Service Misclassifies Tobacco Imports
GGD-80-19: Published: Nov 6, 1979. Publicly Released: Nov 6, 1979.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
In response to interest generated by increases in the volume of imported tobacco, a study was made of the U.S. Customs Service's classification of tobacco imports.
GAO found that tobacco, which has been processed into strips for use in the manufacture of cigars and cigarettes, was incorrectly classified by Customs as scrap tobacco rather than stemmed cigar or cigarette filler. Since these classifications carry higher duty rates than scrap tobacco, as much as $188 million in import duties may have been lost in the 10 years preceeding November 1979. GAO established that the term scrap tobacco was devised to classify the small particles broken from the leaves in handling, manufacturing cigars, or removing the stem from the leaves, and was not intended for tobacco in an advanced stage of completion for use in the manufacture of cigars and cigarettes. The hand-stemming process in use at the time the tobacco tariff schedules originated usually yielded two half-leaves free of stems as the principal product and scrap as a byproduct. Machine-stemming processes yield strips of tobacco much smaller than the pieces of stemmed leaf yielded by the hand-stemming process. Customs did not change its classification approach over the years, despite changes in industry practices. Since tobacco duties are designed to reflect the stage in the manufacturing process that tobacco products have reached at the time they enter the country, processing tobacco so as to place it in a more usable form should not reduce the duties to be paid. GAO determined that the problem was with Customs' interpretation of the Tariff Schedules rather than the schedules themselves, but suggested legislation as the quickest way of settling the matter.
Oct 26, 2020
Intellectual Property:
CBP Has Taken Steps to Combat Counterfeit Goods in Small Packages but Could Streamline EnforcementGAO-20-692: Published: Sep 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 26, 2020.
Sep 30, 2020
-
Federal Criminal Restitution:
Department of Justice Has Ongoing Efforts to Improve Its Oversight of the Collection of Restitution and Tracking the Use of Forfeited AssetsGAO-20-676R: Published: Sep 30, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 30, 2020.
Sep 10, 2020
-
Federal Tactical Teams:
Characteristics, Training, Deployments, and InventoryGAO-20-710: Published: Sep 10, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 10, 2020.
Sep 8, 2020
-
VA Police:
Actions Needed to Improve Data Completeness and Accuracy on Use of Force Incidents at Medical CentersGAO-20-599: Published: Sep 8, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 8, 2020.
Aug 13, 2020
-
Anti-Money Laundering:
FinCEN Should Enhance Procedures for Implementing and Evaluating Geographic Targeting OrdersGAO-20-546: Published: Jul 14, 2020. Publicly Released: Aug 13, 2020.
Jul 29, 2020
-
Federal Prison Industries:
Actions Needed to Evaluate Program EffectivenessGAO-20-505: Published: Jul 29, 2020. Publicly Released: Jul 29, 2020.
Jul 8, 2020
-
Gun Control:
DOJ Can Further Improve Guidance on Federal Firearm Background Check RecordsGAO-20-528: Published: Jul 8, 2020. Publicly Released: Jul 8, 2020.
Jun 22, 2020
-
Federal Prisons:
Additional Analysis Needed to Determine Whether to Issue Pepper Spray to Minimum Security PrisonsGAO-20-342: Published: Jun 22, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 22, 2020.
May 26, 2020
-
Bureau of Prisons:
Improved Planning Would Help BOP Evaluate and Manage Its Portfolio of Drug Education and Treatment ProgramsGAO-20-423: Published: May 26, 2020. Publicly Released: May 26, 2020.
May 12, 2020
-
Forensic Technology:
Algorithms Used in Federal Law EnforcementGAO-20-479SP: Published: May 12, 2020. Publicly Released: May 12, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here
Explore our Key Issues on Justice and Law Enforcement
Explore our other Key Issues here
