Speedy Trial Act--Its Impact on the Judicial System Still Unknown

GGD-79-55: Published: May 2, 1979. Publicly Released: May 2, 1979.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Federal law requires that a Federal criminal case be processed within the established time frames totaling 100 days. Generally, cases not processed within this period, as extended by allowable delays, must be dismissed with or without prejudice. To allow district courts to move smoothly toward the 100-day limit, legislation provided a 4-year phase-in period during which time specific steps were to become effective gradually.

The district courts did not develop sufficient data to identify the reasons for implementation problems. During the phase-in period, the courts relied on limited data and subjective judgments of court officials, judges, and U.S. attorneys rather than on a systematic evaluation of empirical data to document the problems in meeting the time frames. As a result, limited evidence exists for suggesting either procedural or legislative time frame changes. Nonetheless, the Judicial Conference, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, and the Department of Justice have taken the position that Congress should lengthen the time frame cumulatively from 100 to 180 days. However, there is no assurance that the action called for is neccessary and that it would have the desired effect.

Matter for Congressional Consideration

  1. Status: Closed

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Matter: Congress should establish a viable alternative which would be to modify legislation to require the courts to use the permanent 100-day time frame and postpone the implemention of the dismissal sanction for 18 to 24 months.

Recommendation for Executive Action

  1. Status: Closed

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Recommendation: The Judicial Conference of the United States, in cooperation with the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts and the Judicial Councils should: develop data on a representative basis that clearly shows why cases are not being processed within the 100-day arrest to trial time frame; assess the cause, severity, and impact of these problems to formulate and justify rule changes, additional resources, or amendments, and quantify the problems and identify the various alternatives at the district court level which could be used to overcome these problems; and periodically report the problems to Congress with legislation and improvements needed.

    Agency Affected:


Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

Mar 12, 2018

Feb 15, 2018

Feb 8, 2018

Feb 2, 2018

Jan 8, 2018

Dec 21, 2017

Dec 13, 2017

Nov 6, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here