Prepositioned Stocks:
DOD Needs Joint Oversight of the Military Services' Programs
GAO-19-244: Published: Jan 31, 2019. Publicly Released: Jan 31, 2019.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-5431
russellc@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
The military services keep everything from rations to tanks at strategic locations around the world. Positioning supplies in advance can allow action without waiting for cargo to arrive.
Since 2005, we have found potential problems in the prepositioned stocks programs, which each service manages separately. DOD has fallen short of requirements to synchronize program management, and risks duplication of effort and inefficiency.
We found the services continue to manage the programs with little joint oversight.
We made 6 recommendations, including that DOD fully implement joint oversight of the programs and update Congress on its progress.
A ship that carries Marine Corps prepositioning stocks
This photo shows a docked ship.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-5431
russellc@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
What GAO Found
The Department of Defense's (DOD) implementation plan for managing the military services' prepositioned stock programs does not fully address four of the seven elements required by the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2014. For example, DOD's plan did not include all information required by the NDAA, such as a complete list of the services' programs, information on how DOD would pursue key initiatives, or the resources required to implement the plan. DOD officials told GAO that they developed a plan without detail to allow the services to determine for themselves how to implement their programs. However, absent an implementation plan that fully addresses NDAA requirements, DOD continues to provide incomplete information to Congress on the department's prepositioned stock programs.
Since 2011 when Congress required DOD to take action and since 2005 when GAO first reported on the issue, DOD has not fully implemented a joint oversight approach for managing prepositioned stock programs (see figure).
Congressional Requirements and GAO Reporting Related to DOD's Limited Progress with the Joint Oversight of Prepositioned Stock Programs
DOD's recent approach for implementing joint oversight has been to update guidance documents and develop other efforts, such as a working group, but the services continue to manage their programs with little joint oversight. Without taking steps to fully implement joint oversight, including providing detailed information on how to achieve this in guidance and reviewing other efforts, DOD's management will continue to be fragmented and it risks duplication and inefficiencies among the services' programs. Moreover, updating Congress on DOD's progress would help assure decision makers that DOD intends to follow their direction in establishing joint oversight of prepositioned stock programs.
Why GAO Did This Study
The military services preposition stocks worth billions of dollars at strategic locations around the world to provide U.S. forces with critical assets before supply chains have been established. In the 2018 National Defense Strategy, DOD emphasized that prepositioned stocks provide key logistical support for the department's missions. For many years, GAO has identified the potential for duplication among the military services' prepositioned stock programs due to a fragmented management approach and limited joint oversight within DOD.
In the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2014, Congress required DOD to develop an implementation plan to manage prepositioned stock programs. DOD finalized its plan in August 2017. The act included a provision for GAO to review the plan and report on related issues. GAO assessed the extent to which (1) DOD's implementation plan addresses mandated reporting elements and (2) DOD has made progress in implementing a joint oversight approach for managing the services' prepositioned stock programs.
GAO compared the implementation plan and DOD's joint oversight approach with congressional requirements and federal standards for internal control and interviewed DOD officials.
What GAO Recommends
GAO is making six recommendations, including that DOD provide information required by the NDAA, fully implement joint oversight of prepositioned stock programs, and update Congress on progress made. DOD concurred with all of the recommendations.
For more information, contact Cary B. Russell, (202) 512-5431 or russellc@gao.gov.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of August 2019, DOD was updating its strategic implementation plan and plans to issue the updated plan in the first quarter of 2020. DOD officials stated that they plan to address this issue. We will keep this recommendation open pending our review of DOD's completed actions.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, issue a more detailed implementation plan or include implementation plan details in identified formal department-wide guidance to include an updated list to provide quality information, including all of DOD's prepositioned materiel and equipment programs. (Recommendation 1)
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of August 2019, DOD was updating its strategic implementation plan and plans to issue the updated plan in the first quarter of 2020. DOD officials stated that they plan to address this issue. We will keep this recommendation open pending our review of DOD's completed actions.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, issue a more detailed implementation plan or include implementation plan details in identified formal department-wide guidance to include a detailed description of how DOD will implement the three key initiatives in the plan--policy, governance, and assessment--including clearly identifying what is to be achieved in these areas. (Recommendation 2)
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of August 2019, DOD was updating its strategic implementation plan and plans to issue the updated plan in the first quarter of 2020. DOD officials stated that they plan to address this issue. We will keep this recommendation open pending our review of DOD's completed actions.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, issue a more detailed implementation plan or include implementation plan details in identified formal department-wide guidance to include a description of the resources (i.e., relevant operational and financial information) required to implement the plan including dollar and personnel amounts. (Recommendation 3)
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of August 2019, DOD was updating its strategic implementation plan and plans to issue the updated plan in the first quarter of 2020. DOD officials stated that they plan to address this issue. We will keep this recommendation open pending our review of DOD's completed actions.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, issue a more detailed implementation plan or include implementation plan details in identified formal department-wide guidance to include a description of how the department will review and assess the implementation plan for effectiveness. (Recommendation 4)
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of August 2019, DOD was updating its strategic implementation plan and plans to issue the updated plan in the first quarter of 2020. DOD officials stated that they plan to address this issue in the updated plan. We will keep this recommendation open pending our review of DOD's completed actions.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, take steps to fully implement joint oversight of DODs prepositioned stock programs, including providing detailed information on how to implement such an oversight approach in department guidance and reviewing other joint oversight efforts, in order to synchronize the military services' preposition stock strategies to avoid fragmentation. (Recommendation 5)
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. As of August 2019, DOD officials stated that they plan to address this issue in their next annual report to Congress, which they expect to finish in Spring 2020. We will keep this recommendation open pending our review of DOD's completed actions.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, update Congress on the departments progress in joint oversight management in the prepositioned stock annual report or in a separate report. (Recommendation 6)
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Dec 4, 2019
-
Navy Maintenance:
Persistent and Substantial Ship and Submarine Maintenance Delays Hinder Efforts to Rebuild ReadinessGAO-20-257T: Published: Dec 4, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 4, 2019.
Dec 3, 2019
-
Military Housing Privatization:
Preliminary Observations on DOD's Oversight of the Condition of Privatized Military HousingGAO-20-280T: Published: Dec 3, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 3, 2019.
Nov 27, 2019
-
Water Scarcity:
DOD Has Not Always Followed Leading Practices to Identify At-Risk InstallationsGAO-20-98: Published: Nov 27, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 27, 2019.
Nov 26, 2019
-
Army Corps of Engineers:
Evaluations of Flood Risk Management Projects Could Benefit from Increased TransparencyGAO-20-43: Published: Nov 26, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 26, 2019.
Nov 25, 2019
-
Defense Procurement:
Ongoing DOD Fraud Risk Assessment Efforts Should Include Contractor OwnershipGAO-20-106: Published: Nov 25, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 25, 2019. -
Naval Shipyards:
Key Actions Remain to Improve Infrastructure to Better Support Navy OperationsGAO-20-64: Published: Nov 25, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 25, 2019.
Nov 22, 2019
-
Defense Acquisitions:
DOD's Use of Other Transactions for Prototype Projects Has IncreasedGAO-20-84: Published: Nov 22, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 22, 2019.
Nov 18, 2019
-
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund:
DOD Has Processes for Identifying Training Needs and Maintaining Visibility over ContractsGAO-20-99: Published: Nov 18, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 18, 2019. -
Army Marketing:
The Army Has Taken Recent Actions That Could Improve Program Oversight, Effectiveness, and Workforce PracticesGAO-20-93: Published: Nov 18, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 18, 2019.
Nov 14, 2019
-
Navy Readiness:
Actions Needed to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Changes to Surface Warfare Officer TrainingGAO-20-154: Published: Nov 14, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 14, 2019.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here