Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service: Migratory Bird Hunting; Final Frameworks for Late-Season Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations
GAO-16-120R: Oct 8, 2015
- Full Report:
GAO reviewed the Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service's (FWS) new rule on migratory bird hunting; final frameworks for late-season migratory bird hunting regulations. GAO found that (1) the final rule prescribes final late-season frameworks from which the states may select season dates, limits, and other options for the 2015-16 migratory bird hunting seasons; (a) these late seasons include most waterfowl seasons, the earliest of which commences on September 26, 2015; (b) the effect of this final rule is to facilitate the states' selection of hunting seasons and to further the annual establishment of the late-season migratory bird hunting regulations; and (2) FWS complied with applicable requirements in promulgating the rule.
October 8, 2015
The Honorable Jim Inhofe
The Honorable Barbara Boxer
Committee on Environment and Public Works
United States Senate
The Honorable Rob Bishop
The Honorable Raúl M. Grijalva
Committee on Natural Resources
House of Representatives
Subject: Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service: Migratory Bird Hunting; Final Frameworks for Late-Season Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), entitled “Migratory Bird Hunting; Final Frameworks for Late-Season Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations” (RIN: 1018-BA67).We received the rule on September 25, 2015.It was published in the Federal Register as a final rule on September 24, 2015.80 Fed. Reg. 57,664.
The final rule prescribes final late-season frameworks from which the states may select season dates, limits, and other options for the 2015-16 migratory bird hunting seasons.These late seasons include most waterfowl seasons, the earliest of which commences on September 26, 2015. The effect of this final rule is to facilitate the states’ selection of hunting seasons and to further the annual establishment of the late-season migratory bird hunting regulations.
Section 808(1) of title 5, United States Code, exempts any rule that “establishes, modifies, opens, closes, or conducts a regulatory program for commercial, recreational, or subsistence activity related to hunting, fishing, or camping” from the 60-day delay in the effective date otherwise required by section 801(a)(3)(A). This is a rule relating to hunting and, therefore, the 60-day delay is not applicable. This final rule became effective on September 24, 2015.
Enclosed is our assessment of FWS’s compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule.Our review of the procedural steps taken indicates that FWS complied with the applicable requirements.
If you have any questions about this report or wish to contact GAO officials responsible for the evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule, please contact Shirley A. Jones, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8156.
Robert J. Cramer
Managing Associate General Counsel
cc:Ron W. Kokel
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Department of the Interior
REPORT UNDER 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(2)(A) ON A MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
"Migratory Bird Hunting; Final Frameworks for
LATE-Season Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations"
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) prepared an economic analysis for the 2013–14 season (the most recent economic analysis available).This analysis was based on data from the 2011 National Hunting and Fishing Survey, the most recent year for which data are available.This analysis estimated consumer surplus for three alternatives for duck hunting (estimates for other species are not quantified due to lack of data).The alternatives are (1) issue restrictive regulations allowing fewer days than those issued during the 2012–13 season, (2) issue moderate regulations allowing more days than those in alternative 1, and (3) issue liberal regulations identical to the regulations in the 2012–13 season.For the 2013–14 season, FWS chose alternative 3, with an estimated consumer surplus across all flyways of $317.8–$416.8 million.For the 2015–16 season, FWS also chose alternative 3. FWS also pointed out in the final rule that it also chose alternative 3 for the previous seasons since 2009-10. FWS included the 2013–14 analysis in the record for this rule.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 603-605, 607, and 609
FWS determined that this final rule will have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.FWS relied on a small entity flexibility analysis that was last updated in 2013. The primary source of information about hunter expenditures for migratory game bird hunting is the National Hunting and Fishing Survey, which is conducted at 5-year intervals.The 2013 analysis was based on the 2011 National Hunting and Fishing Survey and the U.S. Department of Commerce’s County Business Patterns, from which it was estimated that migratory bird hunters would spend approximately $1.5 billion at small businesses in 2013.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. §§ 1532-1535
FWS certified that this final rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given year on local or state government or private entities.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
On August 25, 2015, FWS published the proposed frameworks for the 2015–16 late-season migratory bird hunting regulations. 80 Fed. Reg. 51,658. FWS stated that there were no substantive changes from the proposed rule. FWS determined that if there were a delay in the effective date of this rule, states would have had insufficient time to select season dates and limits; to communicate those selections to FWS; and to establish and publicize the necessary regulations and procedures to implement their decisions. FWS therefore found “good cause” under section 553(d)(3) of title 5 to allow this rule to effect immediately upon publication.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501-3520
There are no new information collections under this final rule that would require the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) approval.OMB has approved the existing information collection requirements of the Migratory Bird Surveys and assigned control numbers 1018–0019—North American Woodcock Singing Ground Survey, which expires on May 31, 2018; and 1018–0023—Migratory Bird Surveys, which expires on June 30, 2017, and includes Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program, Migratory Bird Hunter Surveys, Sandhill Crane Survey, and Part Collection Survey.
Statutory authorization for the rule
FWS promulgated this final rule under authority of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (July 3, 1918), as amended, 16 U.S.C. §§ 703-711.
Executive Order No. 12,866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
OMB determined that this rule is a significant regulatory action because it would have an annual effect of $100 million or more on the economy and, therefore, has reviewed the rule under the Order.
Executive Order No. 13,132 (Federalism)
FWS determined that this final rule does not have a substantial direct effect on fiscal capacity, change the roles or responsibilities of federal or state governments, or intrude on state policy or administration, and, therefore, does not have significant federalism effects or sufficient federalism implications under the Order.