International Food Assistance:

USAID Should Systematically Assess the Effectiveness of Key Conditional Food Aid Activities

GAO-15-732: Published: Sep 10, 2015. Publicly Released: Sep 10, 2015.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Thomas Melito
(202) 512-9601
Melitot@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

What GAO Found

The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) does not track the use of conditional food aid in projects funded under Title II of the Food for Peace Act. However, GAO's comprehensive review of USAID data found that most Title II projects included conditional food aid in fiscal years 2013 and 2014. Despite the prevalence of conditional food aid activities, USAID does not regularly collect data on conditional food aid provided through Title II projects and, as a result, could not readily provide data on the use of these activities in USAID's projects. Without the ability to identify all conditional food aid activities, USAID cannot systematically oversee the projects that include them. According to USAID's operational policy, USAID operating units must strive to continuously learn and improve their approach to achieving results in order to meet development goals. GAO's review of available USAID data for fiscal years 2013 and 2014 found that 111 of 119 Title II development and emergency projects included conditional food aid activities and that funding for these projects totaled $2.1 billion—87 percent of all USAID funding for Title II projects during this period. USAID and its implementing partners implemented various conditional food aid activities, most commonly a type known as food for assets, through these projects (see fig.). Beneficiaries of food-for-assets activities typically must work at constructing community assets, such as roads or irrigation systems, in exchange for food.

Types of Conditional Food Aid in USAID Title II Programs, Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014

Types of Conditional Food Aid in USAID Title II Programs, Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014

USAID cannot systematically measure the performance of food-for-assets activities across all Title II development projects and therefore cannot determine the effectiveness of food-for-assets activities in achieving short-term or longer-term development goals. According to USAID's operational policy, measures of program effectiveness should be matched to meaningful outputs under the agency's control. While USAID uses indicators to assess the effectiveness of Title II projects, USAID cannot use these indicators to systematically assess the specific effectiveness of food for assets across its Title II projects. However, during GAO's interviews with 10 implementing partners that implemented 14 projects, partners identified several benefits specific to food-for-assets activities, such as developing needed infrastructure, teaching skills to beneficiaries, and achieving short-term increases in food security. Partners also cited challenges in implementing these activities, such as difficulty in ensuring the sustainability of created assets as well as interruptions resulting from weather and civil conflict.

Why GAO Did This Study

In fiscal year 2014, USAID awarded about $1.3 billion for emergency and development food aid under Title II of the Food for Peace Act. USAID's implementing partners may provide what is known as conditional food aid—that is, food in exchange for beneficiaries' participation in activities intended to support development. For example, food-for-assets activities are intended to address beneficiaries' immediate food needs while building assets to improve longer-term food security. Questions have arisen about whether the dual goals of addressing both immediate and long-term needs may compromise the ability to achieve either goal, underscoring the need to understand conditional food aid.

This report examines, among other things, (1) USAID's use of conditional food aid through Title II development and emergency awards in fiscal years 2013 and 2014 and (2) the extent to which USAID has assessed the effectiveness of food-for-assets activities in development projects. GAO analyzed agency and partner documents and interviewed agency and partner officials in Washington, D.C., and in three countries selected on the basis of project type and representing a variety of partners.

What GAO Recommends

GAO recommends that USAID (1) establish a mechanism to readily identify all Title II programs that include conditional food aid activities and (2) systematically assess the effectiveness of food-for-assets activities in development projects. USAID concurred with the recommendations but disagreed with some aspects of GAO's findings. GAO continues to believe its findings are valid, as discussed in the report.

For more information, contact Thomas Melito at (202) 512-9601 or Melitot@gao.gov.

Recommendations for Executive Action

  1. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: In September 2015 (GAO-15-732), GAO reported that despite the prevalence of conditional food aid activities funded under Title II of the Food for Peace Act, USAID does not regularly collect data on conditional food aid provided through Title II projects and, as a result, could not readily provide data on the use of these activities in USAID's development and emergency projects. GAO recommended that the USAID Administrator establish a mechanism to readily identify all Title II projects that include conditional food aid activities and systematically collect information about the type of conditional activity included in each project. USAID concurred with our recommendation and stated its intention to establish such a mechanism and to collect information about the type of conditional activity in each project through the Food for Peace Management Information System (FFPMIS). In March 2018, USAID provided GAO with updated FFPMIS data illustrating detailed information on the use of conditional food aid for Title II development and emergency projects for fiscal year 2016, including award amounts, number of beneficiaries reached, and associated metric tonnage. Based on this information, we are closing this recommendation as implemented.

    Recommendation: To strengthen USAID's ability to monitor Title II conditional food aid and evaluate food-for-assets activities' impact on reducing food insecurity, the USAID Administrator should establish a mechanism to readily identify all Title II projects that include conditional food aid activities and systematically collect information about the type of conditional activity included in each project.

    Agency Affected: United States Agency for International Development

  2. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: In September 2015 (GAO-15-732), GAO reported that USAID could not systematically measure the performance of food-for-assets activities across all Title II development projects and therefore could not determine the effectiveness of food-for-assets activities in achieving short-term or longer term development goals. GAO recommended that the USAID Administrator systematically assess the effectiveness of food-for-assets activities in development projects in achieving project goals and objectives. USAID concurred with our recommendation and noted it agreed that it should assess the effectiveness of food-for-assets activities in development projects in achieving project goals and objectives. USAID added that it had undertaken relevant reviews of the effectiveness and sustainability of Title II development projects and that it was considering expanding evaluations of completed Title II development projects to assess sustainability of results over time. In December 2018, USAID clarified that internal guidance serves as a tool for USAID's Office of Food for Peace to monitor assets created under food-for-assets activities in development projects, including the conditions under which they were built, benefits, measures of resilience, and progress of implementation. USAID provided GAO with this guidance in September 2018. By using this guidance during its monitoring activities, USAID will likely be able to more directly and systematically assess the effectiveness of food-for-assets activities. Based on this information, we are closing this recommendation as implemented.

    Recommendation: To strengthen USAID's ability to monitor Title II conditional food aid and evaluate food-for-assets activities' impact on reducing food insecurity, the USAID Administrator should systematically assess the effectiveness of food-for-assets activities in development projects in achieving project goals and objectives.

    Agency Affected: United States Agency for International Development

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Nov 21, 2019

Nov 7, 2019

Oct 28, 2019

Oct 3, 2019

Oct 2, 2019

Sep 26, 2019

Sep 24, 2019

Sep 10, 2019

Sep 9, 2019

Looking for more? Browse all our products here