Challenges to the Transportation, Sale, and Use of Intermediate Ethanol Blends
GAO-11-513: Published: Jun 3, 2011. Publicly Released: Jul 8, 2011.
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Text:
U.S. transportation relies largely on oil for fuel. Biofuels can be an alternative to oil and are produced from renewable sources, like corn. In 2005, Congress created the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), which requires transportation fuel to contain 36 billion gallons of biofuels by 2022. The most common U.S. biofuel is ethanol, typically produced from corn in the Midwest, transported by rail, and blended with gasoline as E10 (10 percent ethanol). Use of intermediate blends, such as E15 (15 percent ethanol), would increase the amount of ethanol used in transportation fuel to meet the RFS. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently allowed E15 for use with certain automobiles. GAO was asked to examine (1) challenges, if any, to transporting additional ethanol to meet the RFS, (2) challenges, if any, to selling intermediate blends, and (3) studies on the effects of intermediate blends in automobiles and nonroad engines. GAO examined government, industry, and academic reports; interviewed Department of Energy (DOE), EPA, and other government and industry officials; and visited research centers.
According to government and industry officials, the nation's existing rail, truck, and barge infrastructure should be able to transport an additional 2.4 billion gallons of ethanol to wholesale markets by 2015--enough to meet RFS requirements. Later in the decade, however, a number of challenges and costs are projected for transporting additional volumes of ethanol to wholesale markets to meet peak RFS requirements. According to EPA estimates, if an additional 9.4 billion gallons of ethanol are consumed domestically by 2022, several billion dollars would be needed to upgrade rail, truck, and barge infrastructure to transport ethanol to wholesale markets. GAO identified three key challenges to the retail sale of intermediate blends: (1) Compatibility. Federally sponsored research indicates that intermediate blends may degrade or damage some materials used in existing underground storage tank (UST) systems and dispensing equipment, potentially causing leaks. However, important gaps exist in current research efforts--none of the planned or ongoing studies on UST systems will test actual components and equipment, such as valves and tanks. While EPA officials have stated that additional research will be needed to more fully understand the effects of intermediate blends on UST systems, no such research is currently planned. (2) Cost. Due to concerns over compatibility, new storage and dispensing equipment may be needed to sell intermediate blends at retail outlets. The cost of installing a single-tank UST system compatible with intermediate blends is more than $100,000. In addition, the cost of installing a single compatible fuel dispenser is over $20,000. (3) Liability. Since EPA has only allowed E15 for use in model year 2001 and newer automobiles, many fuel retailers are concerned about potential liability issues if consumers misfuel their older automobiles or nonroad engines with E15. Among other things, EPA has issued a proposed rule on labeling to mitigate misfueling. DOE, EPA, and a nonfederal organization have provided about $51 million in funding for ten studies on the effects of intermediate blends on automobiles and nonroad engines--such as weed trimmers, generators, marine engines, and snowmobiles--including effects on performance, emissions, and durability. Of these studies, five will not be completed until later in 2011. Results from a completed study indicate that such blends reduce a vehicle's fuel economy (i.e., fewer miles per gallon) and may cause older automobiles to experience higher emissions of some pollutants and higher catalyst temperatures. Results from another completed study indicate that such blends may cause some nonroad engines to run at higher temperatures and experience unintentional clutch engagement, which could pose safety hazards. GAO recommends, among other things, that EPA determine what additional research is needed on the effects of intermediate blends on UST systems. EPA agreed with the recommendation after GAO revised it to clarify EPA's planned approach.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: Based on information provided by OSHA officials in November 2013 and September 2014, the recommendation is no longer valid because circumstances have changed. OSHA officials cited three examples for the change in circumstances. First, to address this recommendation, OSHA reached out to numerous stakeholders, including the National Association of State Fire Marshals and the International Association of Fire Chiefs, both of whose members have enforcement responsibilities for service station safety at the State level. They found that OSHA's safety requirements for fuel-dispensing equipment and higher ethanol fuel blends were well understood. Second, OSHA officials found that the issue of using dispensing equipment unlisted for ethanol blends is decreasing as appropriately listed equipment is being introduced to replace legacy equipment through traditional maintenance programs. Third, OSHA officials found that EPA's ongoing postponement of higher ethanol consumption requirements has reduced the pressure on service stations to upgrade or replace their equipment. According to OSHA officials, OSHA currently has no plans for any special emphasis enforcement programs or new guidance for service stations, but will continue to monitor the situation.
Recommendation: To reduce uncertainty about the applicability of federal safety regulations, the Secretary of Labor should direct the Assistant Secretary for Occupational Safety and Health to issue guidance clarifying how OSHA's safety regulations on fuel-dispensing equipment should be applied to fuel retailers selling intermediate ethanol blends.
Agency Affected: Department of Labor
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: In August 2013, EPA officials provided information on their efforts to plan and conduct additional research related to intermediate ethanol blends. EPA activities included (1) issuing two reports in 2012 detailing test results of automatic tank gauging equipment used in various ethanol blends; (2) communicating EPA findings of the impact of microbes associated with ethanol fuels on UST system equipment in 2012; and (3)working with Oak Ridge National Laboratory to better understand the impact intermediate ethanol blends would have on legacy UST equipment, which resulted in a July 2012 report. EPA officials also stated that they currently have work underway on (1) determining the impact of ethanol on other release detection equipment, and (2) a forensic-style analysis of releases that are caused by ethanol. These activities are responsive to GAO's recommendation.
Recommendation: To reduce uncertainty about the potential environmental impacts of storing intermediate ethanol blends at retail fueling locations, the Administrator of EPA should determine what additional research, such as research on the suitability of specific UST components, is necessary to facilitate a transition to intermediate ethanol blends, and work with other federal agencies to develop a plan to undertake such research.
Agency Affected: Environmental Protection Agency