Internal Revenue Service:
Challenges Remain in Combating Abusive Tax Schemes
GAO-04-50: Published: Nov 19, 2003. Publicly Released: Dec 19, 2003.
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Text:
Abusive tax avoidance schemes could threaten our tax system's integrity and fairness if honest taxpayers believe that significant numbers of individuals are not paying their fair share of taxes. Abusive schemes encompass such distortions of the tax system as falsely describing the law (saying, for example, that the income tax is unconstitutional), misrepresenting facts (for instance, promoting the deduction of personal expenses as business expenses), or using trusts or offshore bank accounts to hide income. As agreed, this report focuses on three objectives. They are to (1) describe the nature and scope of abusive tax avoidance schemes as determined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), (2) describe IRS's strategy to combat these schemes and the performance goals and measures IRS uses to track its major effort related to them, and (3) describe how IRS determined the amount and source of staff resources to be devoted to these schemes in the IRS operating division most directly affected.
Abusive schemes vary in nature, and new ones continually emerge, making it very difficult to measure their extent. IRS has been gathering information to better define the scope of abusive schemes. In addition to 131,000 participants linked to abusive schemes between October 1, 2001, and mid- August 2003, IRS officials estimated that several hundred thousand others likely are engaged in abusive schemes. However, IRS documented this estimate only when GAO asked. Documentation can help policymakers judge the appropriateness of IRS resources and strategy in combating the high-priority abusive scheme problem. IRS's broad-based strategy for addressing abusive schemes included: (1) targeting promoters to head off the proliferation of abusive schemes and to identify taxpayers taking advantage of them; (2) offering inducements to taxpayers to come forth and disclose their use of questionable offshore tax practices; and (3) using performance indicators to measure outputs and intending to continue down the path it has started and develop long-term process and results-oriented performance goals and measures linked to those goals. The lack of these latter elements impedes gauging IRS's progress in combating abusive schemes. Using a systematic agencywide decision-making process, IRS planned to shift significant resources to support its strategy, but the level of resources likely to be used in fiscal year 2003 was less than expected due to overly optimistic workload forecasts caused by inexperience with the types of cases involved. Future resource usage remains to be seen, given uncertainty about how much abusive scheme work IRS will have and how long it will take to close cases. IRS's understanding of how many staff will be needed to address the problem over what period will continue to evolve as IRS gains a better understanding of the problem's scope.
Recommendation for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: In our November 2003 report on abusive tax avoidance schemes, we found that IRS had data on 131,000 participants linked to abusive schemes and estimated several hundred thousand others likely were engaged in abusive schemes, but lacked documentation on the basis for the estimate. We recommended IRS document the support underlying future estimates of the size of the abusive scheme problem. IRS began a project after agreeing in its comment letter to GAO that it needed to document the basis for the underlying estimates of the abusive scheme problem, and that it would establish a methodology for doing so. In June 2006, IRS issued a report forecasting the potential population of promoters and participants in abusive tax avoidance transactions and documenting its methodology. As of January 2007, IRS officials said the Service has no further plans to update the study. Documentation can help policymakers judge the appropriateness of IRS resources and strategy in combating the high-priority abusive scheme problem.
Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should document the support underlying future IRS estimates of the size of the abusive scheme problem when IRS prepares the estimates.
Agency Affected: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service