Preliminary Analysis of Military Compensation Systems in the United States and Five Other Countries
FPCD-81-21: Published: Dec 31, 1980. Publicly Released: Dec 31, 1980.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
A preliminary analysis was undertaken by GAO of the military compensation systems of the United States and five other countries. Specifically, GAO reviewed the contrasts and similarities among the systems and identified foreign pay policies or practices which offered the potential for use by the United States in countering All-Volunteer Force manpower problems.
In its review, GAO found that the military compensation system of the United States differs from the compensation systems of other countries in the manner in which it undertakes to satisfy personal living requirements with goods, services, and facilities, and in the way it compensates according to marital and dependency status. Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States maintain their armed forces on a volunteer basis. The three foreign countries, however, have discarded pay and allowances structures similar to those of the U.S. system in favor of a taxable salary system. In Australia and the United Kingdom, the taxable salary system also includes an "X factor" paid to servicemen to compensate for the disadvantages and rigors of military life. Additionally, it was determined that U.S. pay rates, particularly when expressed in terms of purchasing power, are well below those of other volunteer force countries. Finally, the following concepts were identified which appear to offer promise for use in U.S. efforts to overcome current manpower problems: (1) the application of an "X factor" to the military pay system; (2) the linkage of the military pay system to the civilian economy; (3) the creation of a taxable salary system as the U.S. military compensation system; (4) the employment of differential pay rates as inducements for longer term enlistments; and (5) the application of special and premium pays to attract and retain military personnel to specific duties and occupations.
Oct 30, 2020
Retirement Security:
Other Countries' Experiences with Caregiver PoliciesGAO-20-623: Published: Sep 30, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 30, 2020.
Sep 24, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
Older Women Report Facing a Financially Uncertain FutureGAO-20-718T: Published: Sep 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 24, 2020.
Aug 28, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
DOL Could Better Inform Divorcing Parties About Dividing SavingsGAO-20-541: Published: Jul 31, 2020. Publicly Released: Aug 28, 2020.
Aug 13, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
Older Women Report Facing a Financially Uncertain FutureGAO-20-435: Published: Jul 14, 2020. Publicly Released: Aug 13, 2020.
Jun 16, 2020
-
Retirement Security:
BLS Should Explore Ways to Improve the Accuracy, Timeliness, and Relevance of Its Cost-of-Living MeasurementsGAO-20-422: Published: Jun 16, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 16, 2020.
Feb 27, 2020
-
Private Pensions:
IRS and DOL Should Strengthen Oversight of Executive Retirement PlansGAO-20-70: Published: Jan 28, 2020. Publicly Released: Feb 27, 2020.
Jan 9, 2020
-
Social Security Disability:
Action Needed to Help Agency Staff Understand and Follow Policies Related to Prescription Opioid MisuseGAO-20-120: Published: Jan 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Jan 9, 2020.
Dec 18, 2019
-
Capitol Police:
Potential Effects of Raising the Mandatory Retirement AgeGAO-20-137R: Published: Dec 18, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 18, 2019. -
Millennial Generation:
Information on the Economic Status of Millennial Households Compared to Previous GenerationsGAO-20-194: Published: Dec 13, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 18, 2019.
Oct 21, 2019
-
Military Pensions:
Servicemembers Need Better Information to Support Retirement Savings DecisionsGAO-19-631: Published: Sep 19, 2019. Publicly Released: Oct 21, 2019.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here
Explore our Key Issues on Retirement Security
Explore our other Key Issues here
