Reassignment of Senior Military Officers Can Be Managed Better

FPCD-78-28: Published: Mar 21, 1978. Publicly Released: Mar 21, 1978.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

The effect of senior military officers' assignment policies and practices were reviewed with an emphasis on: the cost and extent of senior officer reassignment, reasons for reassignments, the services' assignment policies, and control which may be needed to manage turbulence.

The military made 1.6 permanent change of station moves at a cost of $1.6 billion in fiscal year 1977. Senior officers accounted for 1 percent of all moves and 4 percent of all costs. Worldwide staffing requirements, career development, training, promotions, and retirements are the principal reasons for reassignments. There are no criteria to define how often senior officers should be reassigned to provide continuity, accountability of decisions, good performance, and unit readiness. The thrust in recent years has been to achieve stability by reducing permanent change of station costs. While costs should be a factor, a more rational reassignment policy for senior officers should also consider the effects of frequent reassignments on other elements of personnel policy. The total effect of turbulence, a term used for refer to shortened tours and their effect on the permanent change of station budget, has not been measured. Since senior officers are only a small part of the total military personnel, reducing senior officer movement will not greatly reduce the permanent change of station appropriation.

Sep 16, 2020

Jun 29, 2020

Jun 25, 2020

Jun 1, 2020

Apr 7, 2020

Mar 4, 2020

Feb 6, 2020

Jan 27, 2020

Dec 18, 2019

Nov 18, 2019

Looking for more? Browse all our products here