Issues Affecting Shutdown or Continued Production of the Elk Hills Naval Petroleum Reserve
EMD-82-14: Published: Oct 26, 1981. Publicly Released: Nov 5, 1981.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
GAO examined the consequences of the continued production or shutdown of the Elk Hills, California, Naval Petroleum Reserve considering the impacts on national security, the local economy, and the budget.
Elk Hills, if used for reserve purposes, could help meet vital national security needs and supplement the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). If production continues at the current maximum efficiency rate, Elk Hills will decline quickly as an in-place reserve. Only a full or partial shut-in or allocation to the SPR would maintain the integrity of the reserve concept. Compared to a partial shut-in, a full shut-in would cut day-to-day maintenance costs, but would increase startup costs and delay full production in an emergency. Present law authorizes production only at the maximum efficiency rate or at a level sufficient to preserve ultimate reservoir recoverability. The Administration's present plans to allocate the Government's share of Elk Hills production to Department of Defense (DOD) requirements could result in the consumption of most Elk Hills oil in peacetime, nonemergency situations. The Administration's plans do not include a set-aside for small refiners and any degree of shut-in of Elk Hills would cost the Government substantial revenues. There are at least four options: near-total shut-in; partial shut-in; full or near-full production with DOD allocation and no small refiner set-aside; and full or near-full production with continued 100,000 barrel per day SPR exchange, and DOD emergency access, along with remaining Federal production available for small refiner allocation. No one option completely satisfies all concerns. The legal ramifications of some of the alternatives would have to be considered because some would require modification of existing legislation.
Dec 10, 2020
-
Uranium Management:
Actions to Mitigate Risks to Domestic Supply Chain Could Be Better Planned and CoordinatedGAO-21-28: Published: Dec 10, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 10, 2020.
Dec 8, 2020
-
Offshore Wind Energy:
Planned Projects May Lead to Construction of New Vessels in the U.S., but Industry Has Made Few Decisions amid UncertaintiesGAO-21-153: Published: Dec 8, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 8, 2020.
Nov 19, 2020
-
Nuclear Waste Disposal:
Better Planning Needed to Avoid Potential Disruptions at Waste Isolation Pilot PlantGAO-21-48: Published: Nov 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2020.
Oct 29, 2020
-
Nuclear Safety:
DOE and the Safety Board Should Collaborate to Develop a Written Agreement to Enhance OversightGAO-21-141: Published: Oct 29, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 29, 2020.
Oct 15, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Plans to Modernize Critical Depleted Uranium Capabilities and Improve Program ManagementGAO-21-16: Published: Oct 15, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 15, 2020.
Jul 24, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
Action Needed to Address the W80-4 Warhead Program's Schedule ConstraintsGAO-20-409: Published: Jul 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jul 24, 2020.
Jun 24, 2020
-
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Analyzing Cost Savings Program Could Result in Wider Use and Additional Contractor EfficienciesGAO-20-451: Published: Jun 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 24, 2020.
Jun 9, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Needs to Incorporate Additional Management Controls Over Its Microelectronics ActivitiesGAO-20-357: Published: Jun 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 9, 2020.
May 13, 2020
-
Environmental Liabilities:
DOE Needs to Better Plan for Post-Cleanup Challenges Facing SitesGAO-20-373: Published: May 13, 2020. Publicly Released: May 13, 2020.
May 12, 2020
-
Hanford Waste Treatment Plant:
DOE Is Pursuing Pretreatment Alternatives, but Its Strategy Is Unclear While Costs Continue to RiseGAO-20-363: Published: May 12, 2020. Publicly Released: May 12, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here