Guidance Needed on Use of Natural Gas Price Escalator Clauses
EMD-80-53: Published: Jul 25, 1980. Publicly Released: Jul 25, 1980.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
Price escalator clauses permit producers to raise the initial price of natural gas over a period of time or to raise the price when some outside event occurs. In December 1978, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued interim regulations implementing the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978. FERC stated that establishing maximum lawful prices under the act would not trigger any indefinite price escalator clauses in existing interstate or intrastate contracts. However, in March 1979, FERC stated that it would not prevent price escalator clauses from operating to obtain the maximum lawful prices under the act. The FERC initial decision, as well as its reversal, has created controversy over the treatment of price escalator clauses.
The examination of the act and its legislative history by GAO disclosed that neither FERC nor Congress clearly addressed whether price escalator clauses in existing interstate contracts can be used to obtain the maximum prices under the law. In a report to Congress, FERC stated that producers could charge the maximum lawful prices if the language in their contracts so permitted. However, no explanation was given as to what type of language in the contracts would constitute contractual authority. Similarly, the act contained no reference to price escalator clauses in existing intrastate contracts other than to discuss how they would be handled after 1984. Further, GAO found that FERC failed to assess the economic impact of the escalator clauses on natural gas consumers. The controversy over the usage of escalator clauses has led to price increases ranging from a few cents to over $2 per million British thermal units above prices charged prior to the passage of the act.
Dec 10, 2020
-
Uranium Management:
Actions to Mitigate Risks to Domestic Supply Chain Could Be Better Planned and CoordinatedGAO-21-28: Published: Dec 10, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 10, 2020.
Dec 8, 2020
-
Offshore Wind Energy:
Planned Projects May Lead to Construction of New Vessels in the U.S., but Industry Has Made Few Decisions amid UncertaintiesGAO-21-153: Published: Dec 8, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 8, 2020.
Nov 19, 2020
-
Nuclear Waste Disposal:
Better Planning Needed to Avoid Potential Disruptions at Waste Isolation Pilot PlantGAO-21-48: Published: Nov 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2020.
Oct 29, 2020
-
Nuclear Safety:
DOE and the Safety Board Should Collaborate to Develop a Written Agreement to Enhance OversightGAO-21-141: Published: Oct 29, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 29, 2020.
Oct 15, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Plans to Modernize Critical Depleted Uranium Capabilities and Improve Program ManagementGAO-21-16: Published: Oct 15, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 15, 2020.
Jul 24, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
Action Needed to Address the W80-4 Warhead Program's Schedule ConstraintsGAO-20-409: Published: Jul 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jul 24, 2020.
Jun 24, 2020
-
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Analyzing Cost Savings Program Could Result in Wider Use and Additional Contractor EfficienciesGAO-20-451: Published: Jun 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 24, 2020.
Jun 9, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Needs to Incorporate Additional Management Controls Over Its Microelectronics ActivitiesGAO-20-357: Published: Jun 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 9, 2020.
May 13, 2020
-
Environmental Liabilities:
DOE Needs to Better Plan for Post-Cleanup Challenges Facing SitesGAO-20-373: Published: May 13, 2020. Publicly Released: May 13, 2020.
May 12, 2020
-
Hanford Waste Treatment Plant:
DOE Is Pursuing Pretreatment Alternatives, but Its Strategy Is Unclear While Costs Continue to RiseGAO-20-363: Published: May 12, 2020. Publicly Released: May 12, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here