Nuclear Construction Times for the Second and Subsequent Plants at a Multi-Plant Site Are Overstated
EMD-80-01: Published: Oct 10, 1979. Publicly Released: Oct 10, 1979.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
Many cost analyses project further increases in the cost of nuclear powerplants, based in part on lengthening construction times. It is important that government data accurately reflect the current actual construction times and trends in order to provide a correct basis for these analyses.
The "Construction Status Report" (NUREG), the official document on the status of nuclear construction, indicates a continued lengthening of nuclear construction times beyond the 102 months averaged in 1978. A GAO analysis of nuclear powerplant construction progress over the past 24 months indicates that the rate of nuclear plant construction, instead of slowing, has stabilized. The precise extent of this overstatement of constuction time is difficult to determine. NUREG measures construction duration from a point called mobilization, which occurs prior to site preparation and commencement of structural construction, to fuel load date. At sites with more than one plant, the start of mobilization and site preparation is usually the same for all plants, even though the plants are not scheduled to reach their fuel load dates simultaneously. The construction is deliberately staggered, but the NUREG format does not take this into account in estimating construction time. Thus the apparent lengthening observed in nuclear powerplant construction durations estimated by NUREG is much larger than is actually the case. GAO adjusted the NUREG estimate of construction duration through 1978 by correcting for overstatement for multiple plants; the GAO trend indicates lower construction times and a stabilization in construction at around 90 months.
Dec 10, 2020
-
Uranium Management:
Actions to Mitigate Risks to Domestic Supply Chain Could Be Better Planned and CoordinatedGAO-21-28: Published: Dec 10, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 10, 2020.
Dec 8, 2020
-
Offshore Wind Energy:
Planned Projects May Lead to Construction of New Vessels in the U.S., but Industry Has Made Few Decisions amid UncertaintiesGAO-21-153: Published: Dec 8, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 8, 2020.
Nov 19, 2020
-
Nuclear Waste Disposal:
Better Planning Needed to Avoid Potential Disruptions at Waste Isolation Pilot PlantGAO-21-48: Published: Nov 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2020.
Oct 29, 2020
-
Nuclear Safety:
DOE and the Safety Board Should Collaborate to Develop a Written Agreement to Enhance OversightGAO-21-141: Published: Oct 29, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 29, 2020.
Oct 15, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Plans to Modernize Critical Depleted Uranium Capabilities and Improve Program ManagementGAO-21-16: Published: Oct 15, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 15, 2020.
Jul 24, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
Action Needed to Address the W80-4 Warhead Program's Schedule ConstraintsGAO-20-409: Published: Jul 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jul 24, 2020.
Jun 24, 2020
-
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Analyzing Cost Savings Program Could Result in Wider Use and Additional Contractor EfficienciesGAO-20-451: Published: Jun 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 24, 2020.
Jun 9, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Needs to Incorporate Additional Management Controls Over Its Microelectronics ActivitiesGAO-20-357: Published: Jun 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 9, 2020.
May 13, 2020
-
Environmental Liabilities:
DOE Needs to Better Plan for Post-Cleanup Challenges Facing SitesGAO-20-373: Published: May 13, 2020. Publicly Released: May 13, 2020.
May 12, 2020
-
Hanford Waste Treatment Plant:
DOE Is Pursuing Pretreatment Alternatives, but Its Strategy Is Unclear While Costs Continue to RiseGAO-20-363: Published: May 12, 2020. Publicly Released: May 12, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here