Need for Improvements in the Evaluation System for Unsolicited Nuclear Fusion Research Proposals
EMD-78-63: Published: Apr 26, 1978. Publicly Released: Apr 26, 1978.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
The system the Department of Energy (DOE) uses for assessing unsolicited proposals in the fusion area needs to be improved to ensure that all potential approaches to fusion power are objectively and consistently evaluated. DOE Division of Magnetic Fusion Energy (MFE), now the Office of Fusion Energy, uses varying procedures for reviewing unsolicited proposals. Proposals are sent to the national laboratories and other experts in the area for review or are reviewed by a panel of scientists selected for their competence in the area under consideration. MFE procedures for evaluating the unsolicited proposal from the Fusion Energy Corporation (FEC) were reviewed. Following review by a technically qualified panel, MFE declined to fund the FEC proposals for fusion research based on the lack of promise of the proposed concept and on MFE program priorities. Questions about the issues of similarity and identicalness between devices raised some queries about the effectiveness of the MFE evaluation system. Since the emphasis must be on formal and systematic evaluation procedures to ensure that reasonable and scientifically sound evaluations have been performed, the development of such procedures should consider the need for: (1) a determination that potential panelists do not have direct financial interests in proposals under review; (2) explicit provision for the expression of minority views in panel reports; and (3) an independent appeal process and administrative review outside the technical program. The Secretary of Energy should direct MFE to develop and issue standard review procedures and require that a determination be made of the adequacy of such procedures.
Dec 10, 2020
-
Uranium Management:
Actions to Mitigate Risks to Domestic Supply Chain Could Be Better Planned and CoordinatedGAO-21-28: Published: Dec 10, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 10, 2020.
Dec 8, 2020
-
Offshore Wind Energy:
Planned Projects May Lead to Construction of New Vessels in the U.S., but Industry Has Made Few Decisions amid UncertaintiesGAO-21-153: Published: Dec 8, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 8, 2020.
Nov 19, 2020
-
Nuclear Waste Disposal:
Better Planning Needed to Avoid Potential Disruptions at Waste Isolation Pilot PlantGAO-21-48: Published: Nov 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2020.
Oct 29, 2020
-
Nuclear Safety:
DOE and the Safety Board Should Collaborate to Develop a Written Agreement to Enhance OversightGAO-21-141: Published: Oct 29, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 29, 2020.
Oct 15, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Plans to Modernize Critical Depleted Uranium Capabilities and Improve Program ManagementGAO-21-16: Published: Oct 15, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 15, 2020.
Jul 24, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
Action Needed to Address the W80-4 Warhead Program's Schedule ConstraintsGAO-20-409: Published: Jul 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jul 24, 2020.
Jun 24, 2020
-
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Analyzing Cost Savings Program Could Result in Wider Use and Additional Contractor EfficienciesGAO-20-451: Published: Jun 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 24, 2020.
Jun 9, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Needs to Incorporate Additional Management Controls Over Its Microelectronics ActivitiesGAO-20-357: Published: Jun 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 9, 2020.
May 13, 2020
-
Environmental Liabilities:
DOE Needs to Better Plan for Post-Cleanup Challenges Facing SitesGAO-20-373: Published: May 13, 2020. Publicly Released: May 13, 2020.
May 12, 2020
-
Hanford Waste Treatment Plant:
DOE Is Pursuing Pretreatment Alternatives, but Its Strategy Is Unclear While Costs Continue to RiseGAO-20-363: Published: May 12, 2020. Publicly Released: May 12, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here