Foreign Investment in U.S. Agricultural Land--How It Shapes Up
CED-79-114: Published: Jul 30, 1979. Publicly Released: Jul 30, 1979.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
An analysis was made of agricultural land purchases from January 1977 through June 1978 in 148 counties in 10 States: Arkansas, California, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington.
Of the 3 million acres purchased, it was found that 248,146 acres, or about 8 percent, were bought in 55 counties by 173 foreign purchasers from at least 30 countries. Most of the foreign purchasers were from the Netherlands Antilles, Belgium, West Germany, France, and Switzerland. The activity appeared to be concentrated in certain counties; nine counties, each having foreign purchases totaling more than 5,000 acres, accounted for 163,257 acres of the 248,146 acres of foreign purchases. These counties were Jefferson (Arkansas); Fresno, Kern, and San Joaquin (California); Hall (Georgia); Rosebud and Yellowstone (Montana); Bowie (Texas); and Kittitas (Washington). Foreign investors who buy U.S. real property have U.S. tax advantages involving primarily capital gains that are not available to U.S. citizens who may wish to invest in that same property. Foreign investment bears watching, GAO believes, and it would be beneficial to eliminate the tax advantage to foreign investors. GAO found that most foreign-bought land was bought by Western Europeans for investment security and capital preservation and appreciation; most has continued in its same use; and some property improvements have been made. Nonlocal U.S. and foreign businesses bought 24 percent of the land in the counties reviewed; GAO believed that this fact indicates that the Department of Agriculture should be concerned about erosion of the U.S. family farm structure.
Dec 9, 2020
International Trade:
Observations On Whether Women's Rights and Economic Interests Are Protected or Promoted by U.S. Trade Preference ProgramsGAO-21-190: Published: Dec 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 9, 2020.
Dec 2, 2020
-
Foreign Assistance:
USAID Should Analyze Data on the Timeliness of ExpendituresGAO-21-51: Published: Dec 2, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 2, 2020.
Nov 19, 2020
-
Global Food Security:
Information on Spending and Types of Assistance Provided by the United States and Other DonorsGAO-21-47R: Published: Nov 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2020.
Nov 9, 2020
-
Human Trafficking:
Agencies Have Taken Steps to Strengthen International Anti-trafficking ProjectsGAO-21-53: Published: Nov 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 9, 2020. -
Rule of Law Assistance:
State and USAID Could Improve Monitoring EffortsGAO-21-14: Published: Nov 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 9, 2020.
Oct 27, 2020
-
Forced Labor Imports:
DHS Increased Resources and Enforcement Efforts, but Needs to Improve Workforce Planning and MonitoringGAO-21-106: Published: Oct 27, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 27, 2020.
Oct 2, 2020
-
Combating Wildlife Trafficking:
Agencies Work to Address Human Rights Abuse Allegations in Overseas Conservation ProgramsGAO-21-139R: Published: Oct 2, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 2, 2020.
Sep 22, 2020
-
Cyber Diplomacy:
State Has Not Involved Relevant Federal Agencies in the Development of Its Plan to Establish the Cyberspace Security and Emerging Technologies BureauGAO-20-607R: Published: Sep 22, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 22, 2020.
Sep 15, 2020
-
Steel and Aluminum Tariffs:
Commerce Should Improve Its Exclusion Request Process and Economic Impact ReviewsGAO-20-517: Published: Sep 15, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 15, 2020.
Sep 14, 2020
-
Conflict Minerals:
Actions Needed to Assess Progress Addressing Armed Groups' Exploitation of MineralsGAO-20-595: Published: Sep 14, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 14, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here
Explore our Key Issues on International Affairs
Explore our other Key Issues here
