A firm protested an Air Force contract award for base custodial services, contending that Air Force (1) improperly assessed its past and present performance by polling its references telephonically, rather than having them complete written questionnaires, (2) failed to contact all of its references, and (3) wrongly transcribed the telephonic responses of commercial references identified by its sub...

Protester's challenge to the agency's assessment of past and present performance is denied where the record shows that the agency evaluation was reasonable. That offerors were treated equally. Protester's assertion that the agency wrongly transcribed the telephonic responses of commercial references identified by the protester's subcontractor is denied where the commercial references apparently de...