B-284123.3: Apr 27, 2000

The agency's determination that the awardee's proposal met a requirement limiting allowable ship motions to 7 feet was unreasonable. Where prior to completing the evaluation the agency's evaluators were apprised of significant countervailing evidence that should have given them reason to doubt whether the proposal complied with that requirement. That is. Maritime contends that Violet's facility ca...

B-284123.3: Apr 27, 2000

A firm protested a Navy contract award for layberth services, contending that the awardee's facility could not meet the solicitation's requirements and that the Navy unreasonably determined that this was acceptable. GAO held that the awardee's proposal contained insufficient information and did not meet solicitation requirements and that the Navy's determination was unreasonable. Accordingly, the...