B-283259,B-283259.3:
Oct 28, 1999
A firm protested an Army contract award for wastewater treatment services, contending that the: (1) Army unreasonably evaluated the proposals; (2) Army failed to conduct adequate discussions with it; and (3) awardee made misrepresentations in its proposal. GAO held that the: (1) Army evaluated the proposals in accordance with the solicitation's requirements; (2) Army held adequate discussions with...