[Protests of Navy Contract Award for Ship Control System Upgrades]

B-279662.2,B-279662.3,B-279662.4: Aug 31, 1998

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested a Naval Sea Systems Command contract award for integrated ship control system upgrades, contending that the: (1) Navy's interpretation and implementation of the source selection plan stated in the solicitation violated the requirement that price be evaluated for every source selection; and (2) Navy treated the bidders unequally by allowing the awardee to submit a proposal that far exceeded the stated page limitation. GAO held that the: (1) Navy's source selection decision in which price was considered only as an eligibility factor was improper because it failed to consider price as a significant evaluation factor; and (2) Navy conducted competition on an unequal basis, since the awardee's initial proposal was substantially in excess of the page limitation stated in the solicitation, and the Navy evaluated that proposal for award without specifically advising and providing the other bidders an opportunity to submit proposals without a page limitation. Accordingly, the protests were sustained, and GAO recommended that the Navy: (1) amend the solicitation to reflect its actual needs, including with regard to the page limitation and the intended evaluation scheme; (2) reopen negotiations with bidders and request a new round of best and final offers; (3) terminate the awardee's contract and make award to another bidder, if otherwise appropriate; and (4) reimburse the protester for its protest costs.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here