B-278319,B-278319.2:
Jan 15, 1998
A firm protested an Army contract award for helmets with communication systems, contending that the: (1) method that the Army used to evaluate sound attenuation was not consistent with the purchase description and was unreasonable; (2) Army unreasonably evaluated the experience of the awardee's headset subcontractor, and placed too much significance on price in the downselection decision; and (3)...