https://www.gao.gov/products/403735

B-274944.2: Feb 25, 1997

Is not reasonable where: (1) the deficiencies cited are minor in relation to the scope of work and the revisions necessary to correct them. (2) excluded offeror's price is [deleted] million lower than sole remaining offeror's. Dynalantic contends that it was improperly excluded from the competitive range without discussions based on an unreasonable technical evaluation. BACKGROUND The RFP was issu...

https://www.gao.gov/products/158306

B-274944.2: Feb 25, 1997

A firm protested a Navy contract award for ship-handling simulation services, contending that the Navy improperly: (1) eliminated its bid from the competitive range without discussions based on an unreasonable technical evaluation; and (2) destroyed individual evaluators' notes and worksheets. GAO held that the Navy: (1) unreasonably determined that the protester's technical proposal was unaccepta...