B-274944.2: Feb 25, 1997

A firm protested a Navy contract award for ship-handling simulation services, contending that the Navy improperly: (1) eliminated its bid from the competitive range without discussions based on an unreasonable technical evaluation; and (2) destroyed individual evaluators' notes and worksheets. GAO held that the Navy: (1) unreasonably determined that the protester's technical proposal was unaccepta...

B-274944.2: Feb 25, 1997

Is not reasonable where: (1) the deficiencies cited are minor in relation to the scope of work and the revisions necessary to correct them. (2) excluded offeror's price is [deleted] million lower than sole remaining offeror's. Dynalantic contends that it was improperly excluded from the competitive range without discussions based on an unreasonable technical evaluation. BACKGROUND The RFP was issu...