[Protest of Navy Contract Award for Central Processor Units and Right-to-Use Licenses]

B-272336,B-272336.2: Sep 27, 1996

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested a Navy contract award for central processor units and right-to-use licenses, contending that the: (1) Navy improperly opened discussions with the awardee after initially making award to the protester; (2) awardee's alternate proposal on which the award was based was unacceptable; and (3) Navy should have held discussions with all competitive range bidders and requested best-and-final (BAFO) offers from all bidders. GAO held that the: (1) Navy held post-award discussions with the awardee to provide it an opportunity to modify its bid and clarify information for determining its alternate bid's acceptability; (2) Navy should have held discussions with all the competitive range bidders and requested BAFO; and (3) protester was prejudiced by the Navy's actions, since the award outcome might have been different if the protester had a chance to modify its bid. Accordingly, the protest was sustained, and GAO recommended that the Navy: (1) hold discussions with the protester and the awardee and request BAFO; (2) terminate the awardee's contract if the protester offers the lowest price and make award to the protester; and (3) reimburse the protester for its protest costs.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

Mar 12, 2018

Mar 9, 2018

Mar 7, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here