[Protest of Army Contract Award for Airfield Operation and Maintenance]

B-266050: Jan 23, 1996

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

A firm protested an Army contract award for airfield operation and maintenance, contending that the Army: (1) unreasonably determined that the awardee's bid was technically superior to the protester's bid; and (2) improperly based the award on technical merit without regard to price. GAO held that the Army: (1) reasonably determined that the awardee's bid was technically superior to the protester's bid, since the awardee rated higher than the protester on three of five technical evaluation factors; and (2) properly determined that technical merit was more important than price. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Mar 2, 2021

Mar 1, 2021

Feb 26, 2021

Feb 25, 2021

Feb 24, 2021

Looking for more? Browse all our products here